<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: export to PNG/raster is jaggier than desired in ArcGIS Pro Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/export-to-png-raster-is-jaggier-than-desired/m-p/118899#M4893</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;i was curious, so i tried different DPI with same map loaded. (and same 8 bit palette/PNG format). &amp;nbsp; it works well up to 800 DPI, but if i put in DPI 1000 or higher, the output becomes messed up - blurry and jaggy both, like above exported image. &amp;nbsp;so there is some kind of issue with the exporter that if given very high DPI it gets confused. &amp;nbsp;i was figuring higher DPI would always be the same or better, but not so. &amp;nbsp;the file size is not even that big&amp;nbsp;at 800 DPI and the res is good enough for what i'm doing. &amp;nbsp;i guess if someone really wanted super res there would be a problem (with the raster export). &amp;nbsp;but for now i'm all set. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks very much for your help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;j&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 21:41:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JohnGreene1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-11-04T21:41:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>export to PNG/raster is jaggier than desired</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/export-to-png-raster-is-jaggier-than-desired/m-p/118895#M4889</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;i'm a new arcgisPro user.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i am trying to export a world borders map to raster format. &amp;nbsp;i used high image quality and high pixel resolution, but even so, the resulting raster image is pretty jaggy. &amp;nbsp;i'm using the 'light gray canvas' image of the world as the basemap. &amp;nbsp;i hope to export the borders shown there to raster. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;can anyone walk me through how to export and preserve pretty good resolution when exporting to raster? &amp;nbsp;i'm fine to have a giant output file - it can be 5000x10000 pixels (for the whole world). &amp;nbsp;something around 2000x4000 would have enough res&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2016 23:24:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/export-to-png-raster-is-jaggier-than-desired/m-p/118895#M4889</guid>
      <dc:creator>JohnGreene1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-03T23:24:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: export to PNG/raster is jaggier than desired</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/export-to-png-raster-is-jaggier-than-desired/m-p/118896#M4890</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Try changing the page setup to a larger page...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="http://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/help/layouts/page-setup.htm" title="http://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/help/layouts/page-setup.htm"&gt;Page setup—Layouts | ArcGIS for Desktop&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 02:29:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/export-to-png-raster-is-jaggier-than-desired/m-p/118896#M4890</guid>
      <dc:creator>JayantaPoddar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-04T02:29:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: export to PNG/raster is jaggier than desired</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/export-to-png-raster-is-jaggier-than-desired/m-p/118897#M4891</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks for the suggestion, jayanta. &amp;nbsp;i tried it, but the results didn't improve much. &amp;nbsp;here are some screenshots to illustrate the problem. &amp;nbsp;i wonder if i am just not using the tools right. &amp;nbsp;i added a D size layout (very big paper). &amp;nbsp;i added the map (light gray canvas) to the layout. &amp;nbsp;i exported using ping and 1000 DPI. &amp;nbsp;that should give something like 24,000 pixels in height since D size is 24". &amp;nbsp;i used 8 bit gray scale output. &amp;nbsp;the file is very big (16MB), but the png image is not good. &amp;nbsp;here are screenshots of the png export (first image here) and the screen i see in arcgispro map view (2nd image). &amp;nbsp;. &amp;nbsp;&lt;IMG alt="png export of map" class="image-2 jive-image j-img-original" src="/legacyfs/online/257292_png export of map.PNG" /&gt;&lt;IMG alt="screen shot of arcgis map in arcgis app" class="image-1 jive-image j-img-original" src="/legacyfs/online/257291_arcgis map screenshot.PNG" style="width: 620px; height: 575px;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the export seems to blur the image a lot, even though i choose high DPI. &amp;nbsp;the png file is 16MB, so the problem is not a lack of pixels. i tried various other output formats - bmp, jpg - but had similar results (both are a bit worse than png). &amp;nbsp;it seems like i must not have the export set up right, but there are only a few things to pick. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i tried with very high (3000) DPI and E size layout and still got poor results. &amp;nbsp;the output png file was 190MB &lt;IMG src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/emoticons/alert.png" /&gt; but still the image is pretty blurry.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i'd appreciate any suggestions you have&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;j&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 06:53:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/export-to-png-raster-is-jaggier-than-desired/m-p/118897#M4891</guid>
      <dc:creator>JohnGreene1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-04T06:53:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: export to PNG/raster is jaggier than desired</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/export-to-png-raster-is-jaggier-than-desired/m-p/118898#M4892</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;i kept trying things. &amp;nbsp;i loaded a different borders dataset. &amp;nbsp;it looked very similar, but had a different name. &amp;nbsp;this one is called 'world borders'. &amp;nbsp;anyway, then i tried exporting it from arcmap as png, with 400 DPI, about 6.8k x 3.6k, and '8 bit palette' as the format. &amp;nbsp;i get a pretty good-looking png file from this. &amp;nbsp;it is only 240kB. &amp;nbsp;i'm pretty happy with this one, so i think i'll call this issue done. &amp;nbsp;i don't know why i was getting such different results with other formats (or datasets).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 21:23:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/export-to-png-raster-is-jaggier-than-desired/m-p/118898#M4892</guid>
      <dc:creator>JohnGreene1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-04T21:23:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: export to PNG/raster is jaggier than desired</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/export-to-png-raster-is-jaggier-than-desired/m-p/118899#M4893</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;i was curious, so i tried different DPI with same map loaded. (and same 8 bit palette/PNG format). &amp;nbsp; it works well up to 800 DPI, but if i put in DPI 1000 or higher, the output becomes messed up - blurry and jaggy both, like above exported image. &amp;nbsp;so there is some kind of issue with the exporter that if given very high DPI it gets confused. &amp;nbsp;i was figuring higher DPI would always be the same or better, but not so. &amp;nbsp;the file size is not even that big&amp;nbsp;at 800 DPI and the res is good enough for what i'm doing. &amp;nbsp;i guess if someone really wanted super res there would be a problem (with the raster export). &amp;nbsp;but for now i'm all set. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks very much for your help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;j&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 21:41:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/export-to-png-raster-is-jaggier-than-desired/m-p/118899#M4893</guid>
      <dc:creator>JohnGreene1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-04T21:41:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: export to PNG/raster is jaggier than desired</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/export-to-png-raster-is-jaggier-than-desired/m-p/118900#M4894</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you want world boundaries, then exporting a raster is NOT the way to get them.&amp;nbsp; You should be able to find a shapefile or feature class (with the borders as lines or polygons) in a variety of places, including ArcGIS Online, Esri Data and Maps, etc., the ArcGIS Pro tutorial data, etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2016 21:48:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/export-to-png-raster-is-jaggier-than-desired/m-p/118900#M4894</guid>
      <dc:creator>MaribethPrice</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-10T21:48:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: export to PNG/raster is jaggier than desired</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/export-to-png-raster-is-jaggier-than-desired/m-p/118901#M4895</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm having this exact same problem. ArcGIS Pro 2.2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Exported images look terrible and blurry compared to how they look in data view.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2018 17:18:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/export-to-png-raster-is-jaggier-than-desired/m-p/118901#M4895</guid>
      <dc:creator>TheodoreF</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-16T17:18:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: export to PNG/raster is jaggier than desired</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/export-to-png-raster-is-jaggier-than-desired/m-p/118902#M4896</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any solutions to the original problem? without resorting to using ArcMap.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My Pro exports are very blurry (apart from map elements). No matter what DPI I set it to.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2018 17:21:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/export-to-png-raster-is-jaggier-than-desired/m-p/118902#M4896</guid>
      <dc:creator>TheodoreF</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-16T17:21:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: export to PNG/raster is jaggier than desired</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/export-to-png-raster-is-jaggier-than-desired/m-p/118903#M4897</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can't replicate the problem; my 400 dpi jpeg test layout using the grey basemap looks okay.&amp;nbsp; I am using 2.1.1 currently; maybe it is a new issue with 2.2?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2018 18:37:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/export-to-png-raster-is-jaggier-than-desired/m-p/118903#M4897</guid>
      <dc:creator>MaribethPrice</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-16T18:37:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: export to PNG/raster is jaggier than desired</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/export-to-png-raster-is-jaggier-than-desired/m-p/118904#M4898</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Compare that export with how it looks in Data view though. Maybe that's not the best basemap to use for this case, but I've always seen blurry Layout view/exported basemaps in Pro.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2018 15:40:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/export-to-png-raster-is-jaggier-than-desired/m-p/118904#M4898</guid>
      <dc:creator>TheodoreF</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-24T15:40:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: export to PNG/raster is jaggier than desired</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/export-to-png-raster-is-jaggier-than-desired/m-p/118905#M4899</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pro 2.2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Layout view, 1:4000, A4 page. Horrible map rendering... All other elements (ie. Legend, text boxes) look fine!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG __jive_id="415086" class="j-img-floatstart image-1 jive-image" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/415086_pastedImage_1.png" style="float: left;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Data view, 1:4000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG __jive_id="415087" class="j-img-floatstart image-2 jive-image" height="544" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/415087_pastedImage_3.png" style="float: left;" width="389" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Data view, 1:1500&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG __jive_id="415097" class="image-3 j-img-floatstart jive-image" height="548" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/415097_pastedImage_5.png" style="float: left;" width="401" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ideally I'd like the quality in the last image to be retained no matter how zoomed in I am.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2018 13:36:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/export-to-png-raster-is-jaggier-than-desired/m-p/118905#M4899</guid>
      <dc:creator>TheodoreF</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-25T13:36:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

