<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Best Practice for Multiple Users and Single-Use License in ArcGIS Pro Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/best-practice-for-multiple-users-and-single-use/m-p/1120965#M48414</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Is this ArcMap? Sounds to me like a good time to migrate to Pro so you can assign extension licenses more flexibly from named users!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2021 20:19:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>curtvprice</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-11-29T20:19:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Best Practice for Multiple Users and Single-Use License</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/best-practice-for-multiple-users-and-single-use/m-p/1120773#M48385</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;My organization is considering converting our concurrent-use licenses to single-use licenses.&amp;nbsp; However, we're not sure how we will deal with our desktop extensions (i.e. spatial analyst).&amp;nbsp; The decision is being made to free-up more ArcGIS Online users, as we will get 3 single-use licenses for each concurrent license.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone have ideas for how to approach this?&amp;nbsp; Two we have are 1) keep a few concurrent desktop licenses and keep the extensions as concurrent licenses; 2) stand-up a shared workstation that has the single-use desktop and extension licenses.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for any insights!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;--- Patrick&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2021 19:59:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/best-practice-for-multiple-users-and-single-use/m-p/1120773#M48385</guid>
      <dc:creator>PatrickMcKinney99</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-11-29T19:59:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best Practice for Multiple Users and Single-Use License</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/best-practice-for-multiple-users-and-single-use/m-p/1120794#M48388</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Why are you moving away from Concurrent-Use to Single-Use licensing?&amp;nbsp; Knowing that might help inform people's feedback.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2021 15:16:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/best-practice-for-multiple-users-and-single-use/m-p/1120794#M48388</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoshuaBixby</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-11-29T15:16:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best Practice for Multiple Users and Single-Use License</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/best-practice-for-multiple-users-and-single-use/m-p/1120962#M48413</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The decision is being made to free-up more ArcGIS Online users, as we will get 3 single-use licenses for each concurrent license.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2021 19:59:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/best-practice-for-multiple-users-and-single-use/m-p/1120962#M48413</guid>
      <dc:creator>PatrickMcKinney99</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-11-29T19:59:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best Practice for Multiple Users and Single-Use License</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/best-practice-for-multiple-users-and-single-use/m-p/1120965#M48414</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is this ArcMap? Sounds to me like a good time to migrate to Pro so you can assign extension licenses more flexibly from named users!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2021 20:19:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/best-practice-for-multiple-users-and-single-use/m-p/1120965#M48414</guid>
      <dc:creator>curtvprice</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-11-29T20:19:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best Practice for Multiple Users and Single-Use License</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/best-practice-for-multiple-users-and-single-use/m-p/1121421#M48478</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We will providing our users with both ArcMap and ArcPro early next year.&amp;nbsp; Do you have links to any docs related to assigning extra licenses you referenced?&amp;nbsp; I haven't heard about that, and it may solve our problem. Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2021 20:19:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/best-practice-for-multiple-users-and-single-use/m-p/1121421#M48478</guid>
      <dc:creator>PatrickMcKinney99</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-11-30T20:19:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best Practice for Multiple Users and Single-Use License</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/best-practice-for-multiple-users-and-single-use/m-p/1124076#M48841</link>
      <description>ArcPro licenses are best assigned from named users unless you want to share a limited number of extension licenses among users, if that is the case I recommend sticking with concurrent for your Pro licenses. I don’t know anything about the extra licenses you are talking about&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2021 23:14:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/best-practice-for-multiple-users-and-single-use/m-p/1124076#M48841</guid>
      <dc:creator>curtvprice</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-08T23:14:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

