<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Branch version dirty area returns on reconcile. in ArcGIS Pro Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/branch-version-dirty-area-returns-on-reconcile/m-p/1079213#M43339</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Someone else I discussed this with wondered if the act of posting edits was itself a kind of edit, from the perspective of the topology. A bit over my head, but I can sort of see the logic there.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2021 14:54:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jcarlson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-15T14:54:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Branch version dirty area returns on reconcile.</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/branch-version-dirty-area-returns-on-reconcile/m-p/1079199#M43335</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, I am new to branch versioning and I have created a topology in my data.&amp;nbsp; In my test data/feature service, I have a fully validated topology in the Default version (no dirty areas).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In a child version, I made spatial edits that resulted in a dirty area.&amp;nbsp; I validated the dirty area and saved.&amp;nbsp; If I reconcile this version with Default, the dirty area returns.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I validate the dirty area again and save, no other edits made.&amp;nbsp; And then I reconcile with Default again and the dirty area is back.&amp;nbsp; There have been no other versions posted to Default during this time.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't recall this occurring in traditional versioning so is this expected in branch versioned editing?&amp;nbsp; Or did I missing something when creating this?&amp;nbsp; I think we are on enterprise 10.8.1 and I created the data using Pro 2.7.2... but have since upgraded to Pro 2.8.0 and this continues to occur if I retest those steps above.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2021 14:18:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/branch-version-dirty-area-returns-on-reconcile/m-p/1079199#M43335</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steve_Salas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-15T14:18:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Branch version dirty area returns on reconcile.</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/branch-version-dirty-area-returns-on-reconcile/m-p/1079201#M43336</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We see the same behavior. We're still not sure &lt;EM&gt;why&lt;/EM&gt; it's happening, but we work around this by simply doing all of the validating on the Default version.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2021 14:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/branch-version-dirty-area-returns-on-reconcile/m-p/1079201#M43336</guid>
      <dc:creator>jcarlson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-15T14:27:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Branch version dirty area returns on reconcile.</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/branch-version-dirty-area-returns-on-reconcile/m-p/1079210#M43337</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/363906"&gt;@jcarlson&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;- interesting indeed!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2021 14:50:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/branch-version-dirty-area-returns-on-reconcile/m-p/1079210#M43337</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steve_Salas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-15T14:50:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Branch version dirty area returns on reconcile.</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/branch-version-dirty-area-returns-on-reconcile/m-p/1079213#M43339</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Someone else I discussed this with wondered if the act of posting edits was itself a kind of edit, from the perspective of the topology. A bit over my head, but I can sort of see the logic there.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2021 14:54:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/branch-version-dirty-area-returns-on-reconcile/m-p/1079213#M43339</guid>
      <dc:creator>jcarlson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-15T14:54:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Branch version dirty area returns on reconcile.</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/branch-version-dirty-area-returns-on-reconcile/m-p/1102941#M46126</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This looks like known behavior: See: &lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/help/data/topologies/dirty-areas-created-as-a-result-of-the-reconcile-process.htm" target="_blank"&gt;https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/help/data/topologies/dirty-areas-created-as-a-result-of-the-reconcile-process.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the step by step examples in the related page are very helpful: &lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/help/data/topologies/error-features-and-versioned-feature-classes.htm" target="_blank"&gt;https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/help/data/topologies/error-features-and-versioned-feature-classes.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was able to partially code out the situation by checking for dirty areas after making any changes and validating on default, and checking again&amp;nbsp; ... messy and never super reliable. That was with ArcMap&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2021 01:47:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/branch-version-dirty-area-returns-on-reconcile/m-p/1102941#M46126</guid>
      <dc:creator>StefanDieters1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-29T01:47:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

