<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Enterprise GDB Data in Pro - GCS/PCS in ArcGIS Pro Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/enterprise-gdb-data-in-pro-gcs-pcs/m-p/1031980#M38044</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Right now our company is working with static shapefiles, using NAD83 State Plane or UTM projections depending on the location of the data (US, Canada or Mexico).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'd like to put all related information, e.g. wind turbine locations across all our projects, into a feature class within an enterprise GDB so there's a single source to maintain and to enable serving through ArcGIS Enterprise. The analysts would then use these FCs instead of shapefiles for their day-to-day work in Pro. The GDB data would be in WGS84, the APRX would be in a local state plane or UTM projection.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If we do continue on this path, how much potential error is introduced when working with data in GCS WGS84 in a Pro map with a State Plane projection? I know Pro projects on-the-fly so things line up visually but there's some distortion, correct?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2021 16:26:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>BrendanSoulé</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-03-02T16:26:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Enterprise GDB Data in Pro - GCS/PCS</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/enterprise-gdb-data-in-pro-gcs-pcs/m-p/1031980#M38044</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Right now our company is working with static shapefiles, using NAD83 State Plane or UTM projections depending on the location of the data (US, Canada or Mexico).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'd like to put all related information, e.g. wind turbine locations across all our projects, into a feature class within an enterprise GDB so there's a single source to maintain and to enable serving through ArcGIS Enterprise. The analysts would then use these FCs instead of shapefiles for their day-to-day work in Pro. The GDB data would be in WGS84, the APRX would be in a local state plane or UTM projection.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If we do continue on this path, how much potential error is introduced when working with data in GCS WGS84 in a Pro map with a State Plane projection? I know Pro projects on-the-fly so things line up visually but there's some distortion, correct?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2021 16:26:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/enterprise-gdb-data-in-pro-gcs-pcs/m-p/1031980#M38044</guid>
      <dc:creator>BrendanSoulé</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-02T16:26:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Enterprise GDB Data in Pro - GCS/PCS</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/enterprise-gdb-data-in-pro-gcs-pcs/m-p/1032075#M38052</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I would suggest switching to Web Mercator WKID 3857 for your entire enterprise GIS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Everything in one projection and it will work better when sending it online.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2021 19:01:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/enterprise-gdb-data-in-pro-gcs-pcs/m-p/1032075#M38052</guid>
      <dc:creator>RobertBorchert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-02T19:01:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

