<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Darcy Flow residuals show squares when using UTM in ArcGIS Pro Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/darcy-flow-residuals-show-squares-when-using-utm/m-p/1022750#M36782</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm just starting out using the Darcy Flow Analysis tool in the Spatial Analyst toolbox. I was just testing it with some data sets that should be reasonable for my study area. The first time I ran it, I got a smooth looking raster with some high residuals.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Dacry Flow WGS84.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/5159i2EEA8C9B6B4C01DA/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Dacry Flow WGS84.png" alt="Dacry Flow WGS84.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I realized that my potentiometric surface was in the WGS84 coordinate system while the rest of my data was in UTM15N. I re-projected my potentiometric surface to UTM15N and ran the Darcy Flow analysis again. This time the residuals show lots of square edges.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Darcy flow UTM.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/5160i31625627BC16188E/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Darcy flow UTM.png" alt="Darcy flow UTM.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It seems very odd that matching the coordinate systems would make the results look worse.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm not sure if there is an issue with using UTM or if there is a problem with the input data sets that only shows up when I match the coordinate systems. Or if there is something else going on.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any ideas??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Diana&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2021 20:59:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Diana_Di_Leonardo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-02-02T20:59:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Darcy Flow residuals show squares when using UTM</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/darcy-flow-residuals-show-squares-when-using-utm/m-p/1022750#M36782</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm just starting out using the Darcy Flow Analysis tool in the Spatial Analyst toolbox. I was just testing it with some data sets that should be reasonable for my study area. The first time I ran it, I got a smooth looking raster with some high residuals.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Dacry Flow WGS84.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/5159i2EEA8C9B6B4C01DA/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Dacry Flow WGS84.png" alt="Dacry Flow WGS84.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I realized that my potentiometric surface was in the WGS84 coordinate system while the rest of my data was in UTM15N. I re-projected my potentiometric surface to UTM15N and ran the Darcy Flow analysis again. This time the residuals show lots of square edges.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Darcy flow UTM.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/5160i31625627BC16188E/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Darcy flow UTM.png" alt="Darcy flow UTM.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It seems very odd that matching the coordinate systems would make the results look worse.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm not sure if there is an issue with using UTM or if there is a problem with the input data sets that only shows up when I match the coordinate systems. Or if there is something else going on.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any ideas??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Diana&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2021 20:59:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/darcy-flow-residuals-show-squares-when-using-utm/m-p/1022750#M36782</guid>
      <dc:creator>Diana_Di_Leonardo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-02T20:59:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Darcy Flow residuals show squares when using UTM</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/darcy-flow-residuals-show-squares-when-using-utm/m-p/1023275#M36883</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Best practice is for all raster datasets to be in a projected coordinate system for any geoprocessing tools.&amp;nbsp; One thing you can do is click the raster layer in the Contents pane and go to the Raster Layer-Appearance contextual tab at the top.&amp;nbsp; In the rendering group, change the Resampling Type and change the resampling type to Bilinear.&amp;nbsp; Does it change the appearance for the better or worse?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2021 02:51:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/darcy-flow-residuals-show-squares-when-using-utm/m-p/1023275#M36883</guid>
      <dc:creator>Robert_LeClair</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-04T02:51:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Darcy Flow residuals show squares when using UTM</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/darcy-flow-residuals-show-squares-when-using-utm/m-p/1024403#M37039</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It still has that checkerboard pattern. Changing the rendering helps a little. The edges seem less sharp, but it is still very boxy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Diana_Di_Leonardo_0-1612799834186.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/5493iD45E3802630317B1/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Diana_Di_Leonardo_0-1612799834186.png" alt="Diana_Di_Leonardo_0-1612799834186.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2021 15:57:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/darcy-flow-residuals-show-squares-when-using-utm/m-p/1024403#M37039</guid>
      <dc:creator>Diana_Di_Leonardo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-08T15:57:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

