<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Truncated Spatial Results from Cell Statistics tool using SUM statistic. in ArcGIS Pro Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/truncated-spatial-results-from-cell-statistics/m-p/1012402#M35447</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Cell size, raster extent and snap raster should all be specified.&amp;nbsp; Every tool has an Environments tab... most often it is missed and it is the most important one.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="cell_statistics.png" style="width: 370px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/2893i257C75B272E832F9/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="cell_statistics.png" alt="cell_statistics.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2020 03:59:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DanPatterson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-12-28T03:59:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Truncated Spatial Results from Cell Statistics tool using SUM statistic.</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/truncated-spatial-results-from-cell-statistics/m-p/1012400#M35446</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;BACKGROUND:&amp;nbsp; I have 12 rasters, each of which I have reclassified (using RECLASSIFY tool).&amp;nbsp; That is, each pixel of each raster has a value of&amp;nbsp; 0 or 1 depending on the presence or absence of a particular value in each raster layer.&amp;nbsp; Then I use Cell Statistics to sum all 12 rasters.&amp;nbsp; This provides me with an output raster with the summed values, which is then a classification map.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PROBLEM:&amp;nbsp; I found that the output was truncated spatially.&amp;nbsp; That is, instead of showing the entire region (in this case Asia), it is showing a rectangular subset.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;I went back and looked at each individual raster and redid some of them to ensure they were all in the right format.&amp;nbsp; But no luck.&amp;nbsp; Then I tried doing a pairwise Cell Statistic run with only two raster layers at a time and some other types of tests.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are just a few layers when added will create this truncated result.&amp;nbsp; So there must be something to do with extent of the layer which doesn't cause a display problem when displayed alone.&amp;nbsp; These are all projected in Mercator Sphere.&amp;nbsp; If it is the 'extent' where would this have been defined and can I change it?&amp;nbsp; Any other suggestions?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2020 03:28:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/truncated-spatial-results-from-cell-statistics/m-p/1012400#M35446</guid>
      <dc:creator>LaurieKurilla1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-28T03:28:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Truncated Spatial Results from Cell Statistics tool using SUM statistic.</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/truncated-spatial-results-from-cell-statistics/m-p/1012402#M35447</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Cell size, raster extent and snap raster should all be specified.&amp;nbsp; Every tool has an Environments tab... most often it is missed and it is the most important one.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="cell_statistics.png" style="width: 370px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/2893i257C75B272E832F9/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="cell_statistics.png" alt="cell_statistics.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2020 03:59:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/truncated-spatial-results-from-cell-statistics/m-p/1012402#M35447</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-28T03:59:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Truncated Spatial Results from Cell Statistics tool using SUM statistic.</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/truncated-spatial-results-from-cell-statistics/m-p/1012571#M35492</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Brilliant!&amp;nbsp; I have poked around in Parameters and Environments tabs a couple of times over the past months but never took the time to really investigate their meaning and importance.&amp;nbsp; I bow to you Dan Patterson!&amp;nbsp; Within 15 minutes I was able to achieve what I could not after about 50 hours of frustration.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you, thank you, thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Laurie&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2020 22:13:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/truncated-spatial-results-from-cell-statistics/m-p/1012571#M35492</guid>
      <dc:creator>LaurieKurilla1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-28T22:13:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

