<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Is there a better work around to get legend patch shapes other than square and rectangle? in ArcGIS Pro Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/is-there-a-better-work-around-to-get-legend-patch/m-p/615724#M27353</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I couldn't agree more.&amp;nbsp; The lack of this feature restricts good cartography.&amp;nbsp; When it is important, at least I can import the patches as graphics.&amp;nbsp; Thanks for the reply.&amp;nbsp; Nice to know someone else is having the same issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 15:52:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-09-27T15:52:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is there a better work around to get legend patch shapes other than square and rectangle?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/is-there-a-better-work-around-to-get-legend-patch/m-p/615722#M27351</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;At present, I am creating ArcPro legend patches in ArcMap then converting them to graphics for import into Pro.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2017 23:18:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/is-there-a-better-work-around-to-get-legend-patch/m-p/615722#M27351</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-26T23:18:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is there a better work around to get legend patch shapes other than square and rectangle?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/is-there-a-better-work-around-to-get-legend-patch/m-p/615723#M27352</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;At ArcGIS Pro 2.0, ArcMap patches other than rectangle, zig-zag and other default patch styles are not supported.&amp;nbsp; I attempted to import a *.mxd with other patch styles and they did not import with the *.mxd.&amp;nbsp; I'm hopeful the next release of ArcGIS Pro supports non-default patch styles.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 15:46:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/is-there-a-better-work-around-to-get-legend-patch/m-p/615723#M27352</guid>
      <dc:creator>Robert_LeClair</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-27T15:46:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is there a better work around to get legend patch shapes other than square and rectangle?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/is-there-a-better-work-around-to-get-legend-patch/m-p/615724#M27353</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I couldn't agree more.&amp;nbsp; The lack of this feature restricts good cartography.&amp;nbsp; When it is important, at least I can import the patches as graphics.&amp;nbsp; Thanks for the reply.&amp;nbsp; Nice to know someone else is having the same issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 15:52:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/is-there-a-better-work-around-to-get-legend-patch/m-p/615724#M27353</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-27T15:52:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

