<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic object-based image classfication in ArcGIS Pro Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/object-based-image-classfication/m-p/585346#M25805</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just test some capabilities associated with ‘object-based image classification’ in 10.3 and Pro, including “Segmentation and Classification” with “Generalization” tools. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From our experience, when working on mid-accuracy (around 10-m in accuracy) landuse and built-up feature extraction (roads, buildings) from pan-sharpened (1.5-m) SPOT 6 and NON-pan sharpened (1.5-m) Pleiades /GeoEye, the workflow with those tools are very effective and reproducible, in operation. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Of course, with pan-sharpened (0.5-m) Pleiades /GeoEye, the accuracy and efficiency are still not comparable to ERDAS Objective. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Generally speaking, those latest tools by 10.3 and Pro 1.0 offer the great improvements on this direction…&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot, raster team…&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2015 07:23:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>larryzhang</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-03-29T07:23:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>object-based image classfication</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/object-based-image-classfication/m-p/585346#M25805</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just test some capabilities associated with ‘object-based image classification’ in 10.3 and Pro, including “Segmentation and Classification” with “Generalization” tools. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From our experience, when working on mid-accuracy (around 10-m in accuracy) landuse and built-up feature extraction (roads, buildings) from pan-sharpened (1.5-m) SPOT 6 and NON-pan sharpened (1.5-m) Pleiades /GeoEye, the workflow with those tools are very effective and reproducible, in operation. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Of course, with pan-sharpened (0.5-m) Pleiades /GeoEye, the accuracy and efficiency are still not comparable to ERDAS Objective. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Generally speaking, those latest tools by 10.3 and Pro 1.0 offer the great improvements on this direction…&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot, raster team…&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2015 07:23:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/object-based-image-classfication/m-p/585346#M25805</guid>
      <dc:creator>larryzhang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-29T07:23:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

