topic Different results when manually applying raster functions vs. using a raster function template on same raster dataset in ArcGIS Pro Questions https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/different-results-when-manually-applying-raster/m-p/53908#M2249 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Why would I be getting a different value range when I run the same file through a series of raster functions manually compared to the same functions that I saved in a template?&nbsp; In my 1st attachment, the lower gray scale layer was put through Apparent Reflectance, Tasseled Cap, then had Band 3 extracted from the TC result all in an RFT.&nbsp; The three layers above that show the results of doing it manually. I've run other rasters through the same processes and gotten the same type of problem.&nbsp; I don't see a pattern in the differences, the lows and highs are varied: on one raster it was 7 off on the high, but on another it was 9 off; on the same two, one was 16 off on the low and the other 79 off on the low.&nbsp; Hopefully this is making sense.&nbsp; Any ideas?</P><P>Cheryl</P></BODY></HTML> Tue, 16 Apr 2019 21:02:17 GMT CherylCollins 2019-04-16T21:02:17Z Different results when manually applying raster functions vs. using a raster function template on same raster dataset https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/different-results-when-manually-applying-raster/m-p/53908#M2249 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Why would I be getting a different value range when I run the same file through a series of raster functions manually compared to the same functions that I saved in a template?&nbsp; In my 1st attachment, the lower gray scale layer was put through Apparent Reflectance, Tasseled Cap, then had Band 3 extracted from the TC result all in an RFT.&nbsp; The three layers above that show the results of doing it manually. I've run other rasters through the same processes and gotten the same type of problem.&nbsp; I don't see a pattern in the differences, the lows and highs are varied: on one raster it was 7 off on the high, but on another it was 9 off; on the same two, one was 16 off on the low and the other 79 off on the low.&nbsp; Hopefully this is making sense.&nbsp; Any ideas?</P><P>Cheryl</P></BODY></HTML> Tue, 16 Apr 2019 21:02:17 GMT https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/different-results-when-manually-applying-raster/m-p/53908#M2249 CherylCollins 2019-04-16T21:02:17Z