<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Geocoding Results Spatially Off in ArcGIS Pro Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/geocoding-results-spatially-off/m-p/470729#M20716</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is just odd that it should line up with an existing feature, but it does not.&amp;nbsp; Nothing to lose sleep over, so I am moving on.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2019 19:39:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DavidBuehler</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-12-03T19:39:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Geocoding Results Spatially Off</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/geocoding-results-spatially-off/m-p/470727#M20714</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I created a locator in Pro using the "Create Address Locator" geoprocessing tool.&amp;nbsp; It was a "US Address - Single House Subaddress". Then I ran the "Geocode Addresses" geogprocessing tool against a table of addresses, using the preferred location type of address location, and checked the categories.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What I am seeing is the geocoder has matched all of addresses in the table with almost 100% certainty.&amp;nbsp; However spatially the results are off from the actual point.&amp;nbsp; The results are any where from .3' to a foot and half off.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have checked the data from the source and the map are in the same projection.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am a loss.&amp;nbsp; Should they not line up exactly?&lt;IMG alt="" class="jive-emoji image-1 jive-image j-img-original" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/474800_geocode.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2019 15:29:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/geocoding-results-spatially-off/m-p/470727#M20714</guid>
      <dc:creator>DavidBuehler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-27T15:29:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Geocoding Results Spatially Off</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/geocoding-results-spatially-off/m-p/470728#M20715</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM style="background-color: #ffffff; "&gt;The results are any where from .3' to a foot and half off.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;Given the season, my first thought is you have a lot to be thankful for...&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;I guess in theory they should be, but that level of precision would be more than good enough for me...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2019 15:51:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/geocoding-results-spatially-off/m-p/470728#M20715</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoeBorgione</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-27T15:51:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Geocoding Results Spatially Off</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/geocoding-results-spatially-off/m-p/470729#M20716</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is just odd that it should line up with an existing feature, but it does not.&amp;nbsp; Nothing to lose sleep over, so I am moving on.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2019 19:39:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/geocoding-results-spatially-off/m-p/470729#M20716</guid>
      <dc:creator>DavidBuehler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-03T19:39:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Geocoding Results Spatially Off</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/geocoding-results-spatially-off/m-p/1408977#M81771</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;David:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This happens with our locators as well. Did you ever find an explanation?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2024 14:15:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/geocoding-results-spatially-off/m-p/1408977#M81771</guid>
      <dc:creator>ChipBrownHBG</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-12T14:15:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Geocoding Results Spatially Off</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/geocoding-results-spatially-off/m-p/1497775#M84976</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi. Having similar issue.&amp;nbsp; Using the Pro 3.3 modelbuilder Geocode Addresses tool, I get results that are off by up to 100 ft or more.&amp;nbsp; If I use the ArcGIS Pro 3.3 Locate tool, the first result is correct, but geocoding using the same locator and addresses gives a different result.&amp;nbsp; Unfortunaly this case doesn't allow my results to be good enough.&amp;nbsp; Has anyone found a solution?&amp;nbsp; Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2024 17:51:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/geocoding-results-spatially-off/m-p/1497775#M84976</guid>
      <dc:creator>MariaGiarrusso</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-06-26T17:51:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Geocoding Results Spatially Off</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/geocoding-results-spatially-off/m-p/1506700#M85705</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No.&amp;nbsp; No one ever responded to my question. Still very curious about it though.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 15:41:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/geocoding-results-spatially-off/m-p/1506700#M85705</guid>
      <dc:creator>ChipBrownHBG</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-18T15:41:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Geocoding Results Spatially Off</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/geocoding-results-spatially-off/m-p/1506713#M85707</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I opened a case w/ ESRI (#03661884).&amp;nbsp; I was able to change the settings of the locator to get the desired results. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Here are some notes from my case. Hopefully this is helpful for you too.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Original issue:&amp;nbsp; The geocoded points do not fall over the reference data and has an offset ranging from 0.5 feet to 1.5 feet to in ArcGIS Pro.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Created a new locator using the "Create Locator tool" with the following parameters:&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Country or Region: United States&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Primary Table(s): E911Address_Points_Current_Cranston; Role: Point Address&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Field Mapping: House Number: Address_Number; Street Name: Street_Name; Suffix Type: Street_Type_Suffix; Full Street Name: Full_StreetName; State: State&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Optional parameters: Precision Type- Local Extra High.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;The default precision type "Global High" has a&amp;nbsp;precision of approximately 0.5 meter, which is consistent globally. Hence, we were getting an offset in the Geocoded result.&amp;nbsp; Instead use &amp;nbsp;Precision Type- Local Extra High.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Match with no Zones = 'Yes' and comprehensive zone matching = ‘No’ in the Geocoding options&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Geocoded the "LocatorTest_E911PtsTable" with the newly created Point Locator, and the output feature layer did not have any offset and was lying on top of the original points.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 16:02:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/geocoding-results-spatially-off/m-p/1506713#M85707</guid>
      <dc:creator>MariaGiarrusso</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-18T16:02:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

