<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Attribute Rules in a versioned GDB with rec/post Python scripts? in ArcGIS Pro Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/attribute-rules-in-a-versioned-gdb-with-rec-post/m-p/37408#M1503</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your explanation of the impact of using Attribute Rules in Pro is excellent as it highlights the difficulty of migrating data editing workflows from ArcMap to Pro.&amp;nbsp; A re-design of Attribute Rules to not make the data unusable in Pro would be very helpful.&amp;nbsp; This same type of behavior was also built into the design of annotation which makes that type of data difficult to migrate (Posts on geonet about this).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2019 19:57:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MichaelVolz</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-07-02T19:57:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Attribute Rules in a versioned GDB with rec/post Python scripts?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/attribute-rules-in-a-versioned-gdb-with-rec-post/m-p/37406#M1501</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;ArcGIS Server v 10.5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ArcPro v 2.3.3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;many of our GDBs in server are versioned and most or all of them have scripts that run nightly/weekly to rec/post edits (written in Python v 2.7) and pass data to a 3rd party viewer for parcels, etc&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we can perform basic parcel maintenance in Pro, but the functionality really comes around when we combine editing in Pro with &lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/t5/tag/AttributeRules/tg-p"&gt;#AttributeRules&lt;/A&gt; to streamline/QC the data as we work&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the problem is that applying attribute rules in Pro effectively removes the feature class from the Enterprise GDB (Unless you're accessing it via Pro v 2.1 or later) - that means the scheduled scripts we rely on for Rec/Post and data transfer don't work on feature classes with &lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/t5/tag/AttributeRules/tg-p"&gt;#AttributeRules&lt;/A&gt; applied in Pro&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;my first thought is to simply duplicate the FC in Enterprise, apply the Att Rules to the new FC, and proceed with edits there. Then I can rig up a drop/replace script to pass the data from the new FC to the original FC (the one utilized by our scheduled tasks for data transfer and Rec/Post)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So my question: can anyone suggest a better solution? could I rewrite the Rec/Post and data transfer scripts in a different version of Python that might actually work with Pro and Attribute Assistant?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'll be testing this idea, but I thought I'd ask here in case there's a better way&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2019 15:01:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/attribute-rules-in-a-versioned-gdb-with-rec-post/m-p/37406#M1501</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-14T15:01:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Attribute Rules in a versioned GDB with rec/post Python scripts?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/attribute-rules-in-a-versioned-gdb-with-rec-post/m-p/37407#M1502</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;update on our journey:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In addition to whatever feature class that has an attribute rule applied being essentially disabled in ArcMap (or prior versions of Pro), any feature dataset that contains a feature with attribute rules is locked to editing as well:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a polygon FC called (for example) Par_Edit that lives in a feature dataset called Parcel_Editing. I created a duplicate of this FC (Par_Edit_doop) and applied a calculation attribute rule for testing purposes. Att rules worked fine with Par_Edit_doop sitting directly on the enterprise GDB but when I imported the FC into the Parcel_Editing Feature Dataset (the original home of the Parcel FC), I had to rename the FC (Par_Edit_doop2) and the Att rule was lost.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was able to recreate the Attribute Rule on Par_Edit_doop2 but was unable to complete any manual attribute edits on the FC due to schema locks so I decided to revert to ArcMap workflows to complete the simple edit&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In ArcMap, in an .mxd using the original parcel FC, Par_Edit was flagged as un-editable unable to be edited?) and remained that way until I deleted Par_Edit_doop2 from the feature dataset&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;so it appears that attribute rules&amp;nbsp;applied to&amp;nbsp;features in a feature dataset not only affect the FC the rules are applied to - the other features in the feature dataset are rendered unusable in ArcMap as well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2019 19:49:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/attribute-rules-in-a-versioned-gdb-with-rec-post/m-p/37407#M1502</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-02T19:49:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Attribute Rules in a versioned GDB with rec/post Python scripts?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/attribute-rules-in-a-versioned-gdb-with-rec-post/m-p/37408#M1503</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your explanation of the impact of using Attribute Rules in Pro is excellent as it highlights the difficulty of migrating data editing workflows from ArcMap to Pro.&amp;nbsp; A re-design of Attribute Rules to not make the data unusable in Pro would be very helpful.&amp;nbsp; This same type of behavior was also built into the design of annotation which makes that type of data difficult to migrate (Posts on geonet about this).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2019 19:57:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/attribute-rules-in-a-versioned-gdb-with-rec-post/m-p/37408#M1503</guid>
      <dc:creator>MichaelVolz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-02T19:57:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

