<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Combine issue with least-cost path in ArcGIS Pro Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/combine-issue-with-least-cost-path/m-p/286169#M12478</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, thank you! That's exactly the answer and it does the trick.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I can ask a follow-up question, is the result displayed in the image on account of the averaging of the numbers? The red line is the original polyline I drew. The faint line to the left is the least-cost path resulting only from the DEM (is there a way to make these more visible without touching them up in the layout view later?) The green is the new least-cost path from the DEM + road. It more or less follows the road's contours. I had expected it to follow it more precisely, given that it's an upland region and rather far from the other result. Is this just a result of the program averaging out some numbers?&lt;IMG alt="" class="image-1 jive-image j-img-original" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/448484_threelines.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2019 04:27:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AureliusDokeianos</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-05-25T04:27:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Combine issue with least-cost path</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/combine-issue-with-least-cost-path/m-p/286167#M12476</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;My apologies in advance for what is likely a rather ignorant question, but I could not find any answers online to my issue. I'm entirely self-taught with ArcGIS Pro 2.3 and have been using it to create some least-cost paths for my dissertation in history. I've been using&lt;A href="http://tinitaly.pi.ingv.it/"&gt; a DEM&lt;/A&gt; up until now for my paths, there being a lack of satellite surface data for seventh-century Italy. I want to add in some Roman roads to see how this would affect the paths. So I made the road in my study area in a polyline, which I then converted to a raster. I then took my DEM and calculated the slope, like I always would when doing a least-cost path, and then I reclassified the slope, with the lowest values having the least slope. Next, I reclassified the road polyline, giving the whole thing a value of 1. Then I ran the combine tool, and what I got is the line in the image. It combined them just fine, but somewhere along the way it removed the rest of the slope raster! I tried weighted overlay, but that did not change anything. What did I do wrong? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2019 22:03:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/combine-issue-with-least-cost-path/m-p/286167#M12476</guid>
      <dc:creator>AureliusDokeianos</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-24T22:03:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Combine issue with least-cost path</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/combine-issue-with-least-cost-path/m-p/286168#M12477</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your non-road areas are NoData I suspect, which won't combine with anything.&amp;nbsp; You need to make your 'road' raster 0 (non-road) and 1 (road)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2019 23:31:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/combine-issue-with-least-cost-path/m-p/286168#M12477</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-24T23:31:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Combine issue with least-cost path</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/combine-issue-with-least-cost-path/m-p/286169#M12478</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, thank you! That's exactly the answer and it does the trick.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I can ask a follow-up question, is the result displayed in the image on account of the averaging of the numbers? The red line is the original polyline I drew. The faint line to the left is the least-cost path resulting only from the DEM (is there a way to make these more visible without touching them up in the layout view later?) The green is the new least-cost path from the DEM + road. It more or less follows the road's contours. I had expected it to follow it more precisely, given that it's an upland region and rather far from the other result. Is this just a result of the program averaging out some numbers?&lt;IMG alt="" class="image-1 jive-image j-img-original" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/448484_threelines.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2019 04:27:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/combine-issue-with-least-cost-path/m-p/286169#M12478</guid>
      <dc:creator>AureliusDokeianos</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-25T04:27:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Combine issue with least-cost path</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/combine-issue-with-least-cost-path/m-p/286170#M12479</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I Use ArcGIS Pro Lucas&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/tool-reference/spatial-analyst/cost-path-as-polyline.htm" title="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/tool-reference/spatial-analyst/cost-path-as-polyline.htm"&gt;Cost Path as Polyline—Help | ArcGIS Desktop&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your cell size for the path on the left is due to the smaller cell size making the path look thin and spotty.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you want to 'see' it, then you need a polyline so you can symbolize appropriately, or you will have to emulate a thicker route for visualization purposes only.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/tool-reference/spatial-analyst/expand.htm" title="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/tool-reference/spatial-analyst/expand.htm"&gt;Expand—Help | ArcGIS Desktop&lt;/A&gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;will do this (try a factor of 2 first, then 3.&amp;nbsp; Again, this is for visualization purposes.... the original costpath will be for the analytical side&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2019 07:43:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/combine-issue-with-least-cost-path/m-p/286170#M12479</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-25T07:43:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Combine issue with least-cost path</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/combine-issue-with-least-cost-path/m-p/1037806#M38676</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Dan,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I seem to have lost the ability to submit a separate question to the forum, so I'm just going to reply to this thread, since it is along the lines of what I'm trying to do.&amp;nbsp; I need to calculate a least cost path from a set of points to a set of polylines (each point should have one resulting LCP to whichever line is best).&amp;nbsp; I also would like the cost analysis to take both directions into consideration.&amp;nbsp; I've read through the various help pages, and honestly it was difficult for me to interpret, so I apologize if it is explained somewhere but I missed it.&amp;nbsp; I've looked at LCP, cost path as polyline, distance accumulation... none of them seem to be meant for point to polyline.&amp;nbsp; Any help would be much appreciated.&amp;nbsp; &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2021 20:22:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/combine-issue-with-least-cost-path/m-p/1037806#M38676</guid>
      <dc:creator>AmyNewsam</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-17T20:22:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

