<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: postgresql schema name limits in ArcGIS Pro Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/postgresql-schema-name-limits/m-p/271836#M11874</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I do not think there is a limitation on the schema name;&amp;nbsp;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/help/data/geodatabases/manage-sql-server/enterprise-geodatabase-limits.htm" title="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/help/data/geodatabases/manage-sql-server/enterprise-geodatabase-limits.htm"&gt;Enterprise geodatabase size and name limits—Manage geodatabases in SQL Server | Documentation&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would guess that the ArcGIS Pro UI is making the table name available based on the UI size.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would contact technical support and have an analyst take a look.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/group/1680"&gt;Geodatabase&lt;/A&gt;‌&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2020 12:08:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>George_Thompson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-07-13T12:08:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>postgresql schema name limits</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/postgresql-schema-name-limits/m-p/271835#M11873</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there any limitation for name of schema allowed to be used?&amp;nbsp; I have PostGIS database, and when I make schema name be extremely short (less than 8?)&amp;nbsp; i can see it from ArcGISPro'd catalogue.&amp;nbsp; But longer schema name appears to hide contents in the schema.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2020 03:42:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/postgresql-schema-name-limits/m-p/271835#M11873</guid>
      <dc:creator>yosukekimura</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-07-11T03:42:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: postgresql schema name limits</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/postgresql-schema-name-limits/m-p/271836#M11874</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I do not think there is a limitation on the schema name;&amp;nbsp;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/help/data/geodatabases/manage-sql-server/enterprise-geodatabase-limits.htm" title="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/help/data/geodatabases/manage-sql-server/enterprise-geodatabase-limits.htm"&gt;Enterprise geodatabase size and name limits—Manage geodatabases in SQL Server | Documentation&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would guess that the ArcGIS Pro UI is making the table name available based on the UI size.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would contact technical support and have an analyst take a look.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/group/1680"&gt;Geodatabase&lt;/A&gt;‌&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2020 12:08:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/postgresql-schema-name-limits/m-p/271836#M11874</guid>
      <dc:creator>George_Thompson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-07-13T12:08:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

