<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Fixing uncessary abbreviations on dynamic labels in ArcGIS Pro Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/fixing-uncessary-abbreviations-on-dynamic-labels/m-p/1675947#M101034</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;My guess as to why Cyn shows up is because at that scale, the labelling engine is picking out a line segment from your canyon lines, so that it sees it as a smaller feature. Maybe try merging the line segments for each canyon into one. Just a guess!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 19:33:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ZenMasterZeke</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-01-05T19:33:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Fixing uncessary abbreviations on dynamic labels</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/fixing-uncessary-abbreviations-on-dynamic-labels/m-p/1675934#M101032</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm labeling some linear geographic features (canyons, etc.) and am having struggles with the abbreviation strategies in my dynamic labels. I created a field with abbreviated versions of my feature names and set Abbreviate to draw from that field. Abbreviate is the only fitting strategy I'm using for these features - if the full name can't fit, use the abbreviated one, and if that can't fit either, leave the label off.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, when I turned abbreviations on, the label engine was way too liberal about using it. It abbreviated the labels on all but the longest lines for no discernible reason.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Label with &amp;quot;street&amp;quot; placement" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/146300iA5A226813D8DA4D0/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="abbreviated.png" alt="Label with &amp;quot;street&amp;quot; placement" /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-caption" onclick="event.preventDefault();"&gt;Label with "street" placement&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm currently using Street placement, because I want the ability to control the spread of both words and letters. If I use the default settings of any other placement style, "Canyon" in the example above is spelled out fully.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Label without &amp;quot;street&amp;quot; placement" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/146299i9EAD00CFACB41F47/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="not abbreviated.png" alt="Label without &amp;quot;street&amp;quot; placement" /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-caption" onclick="event.preventDefault();"&gt;Label without "street" placement&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My desired spreading is 500% for words and 200% for letters, but even with 0% "end of street clearance" and no potential conflicts with other labels or features, the labels like to abbreviate when they don't need to. Is this a bug or is there some functionality I'm not understanding?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To troubleshoot, I used the Main Canyon feature above at a single scale and tried every potential combination of word and letter spreading to look for a pattern. If there was an option to spread by a percentage, I tested 1%, 500%, and 1000%. In the end I didn't see anything obvious. Here's what my results were, if it means anything more to you:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Use default word spacing, Use default letter spacing&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Result: "Canyon".&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Use default word spacing, Spread letters up to a fixed limit&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Result: "Canyon".&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Use default word spacing, Spread letters to fill feature&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Result: "Canyon".&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Spread words to fill feature, Spread letters to fill feature&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Result: "Cyn".&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Spread words to fill feature, Spread letters up to a fixed limit &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Result: Varied. 1% letter spread is "Canyon," 500% is "Cyn," 1000% is "Canyon".&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Spread words to fill feature, Use default letter spacing&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Result: "Canyon".&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Spread words up to a fixed limit, Use default letter spacing&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Result: "Canyon".&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Spread words up to a fixed limit, Spread letters up to a fixed limit&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Result: Varied. All spread combination produced "Cyn" unless both were set to 1000%, then it was "Canyon".&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Spread words up to a fixed limit&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Spread letters to fill feature&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Result: Varied. 1% and 500% word spread are "Cyn," 1000% is "Canyon".&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 18:36:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/fixing-uncessary-abbreviations-on-dynamic-labels/m-p/1675934#M101032</guid>
      <dc:creator>Crinoid</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-05T18:36:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fixing uncessary abbreviations on dynamic labels</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/fixing-uncessary-abbreviations-on-dynamic-labels/m-p/1675947#M101034</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;My guess as to why Cyn shows up is because at that scale, the labelling engine is picking out a line segment from your canyon lines, so that it sees it as a smaller feature. Maybe try merging the line segments for each canyon into one. Just a guess!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 19:33:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/fixing-uncessary-abbreviations-on-dynamic-labels/m-p/1675947#M101034</guid>
      <dc:creator>ZenMasterZeke</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-05T19:33:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fixing uncessary abbreviations on dynamic labels</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/fixing-uncessary-abbreviations-on-dynamic-labels/m-p/1679684#M101397</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This was it! If I use Smooth Line to make the line a nicer curve (which was the eventual plan anyway), the label generates like you'd expect it to. Weird but ok! Thanks for the help.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2026 20:05:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/fixing-uncessary-abbreviations-on-dynamic-labels/m-p/1679684#M101397</guid>
      <dc:creator>Crinoid</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-23T20:05:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

