<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea ArcGIS Pro - more Intuitive Default Legend Labels in ArcGIS Pro Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-more-intuitive-default-legend-labels/idi-p/971418</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;When I am creating a map in ArcGIS Pro, many times the default legend labels are not intuitive. In the picture below, you can see the labels default to &amp;lt;= 5 and &amp;lt;=10, which can cause confusion, because technically 3 would fit in the &amp;lt;= 10 category when in reality it would always be in the &amp;lt;=5 category.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/396481_pastedImage_3.png" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A more intuitive approach would be like I've shown, having the default set to the range of values included. And in the last slot it could say "or greater" or "or higher," although I understand if that's not a common enough need.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It seems to me like there's no reason to have the default set to what it currently is, since I've always learned that good map making should always consider the reader first. I hope this change will be implemented in a future release.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2020 23:42:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>deleted-user-sYHsW3p_gN5o</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-12-16T23:42:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ArcGIS Pro - more Intuitive Default Legend Labels</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-more-intuitive-default-legend-labels/idi-p/971418</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;When I am creating a map in ArcGIS Pro, many times the default legend labels are not intuitive. In the picture below, you can see the labels default to &amp;lt;= 5 and &amp;lt;=10, which can cause confusion, because technically 3 would fit in the &amp;lt;= 10 category when in reality it would always be in the &amp;lt;=5 category.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/396481_pastedImage_3.png" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A more intuitive approach would be like I've shown, having the default set to the range of values included. And in the last slot it could say "or greater" or "or higher," although I understand if that's not a common enough need.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It seems to me like there's no reason to have the default set to what it currently is, since I've always learned that good map making should always consider the reader first. I hope this change will be implemented in a future release.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2020 23:42:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-more-intuitive-default-legend-labels/idi-p/971418</guid>
      <dc:creator>deleted-user-sYHsW3p_gN5o</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-16T23:42:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcGIS Pro - more Intuitive Default Legend Labels</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-more-intuitive-default-legend-labels/idc-p/971419#M9309</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, thank you.&amp;nbsp;I came here to make a similar post to this. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I spend a considerable amount of time manually making this change to my maps.&amp;nbsp; As you say, the default method of showing &amp;lt;= x, is not intuitive at all.&amp;nbsp; I want my readers to focus on the nuances of the map, and not trying to figure out the legend.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Policy makers generally do not want to spend a ton of time analyzing a map, and every second they are trying to figure out the legend, that is a couple of seconds they could have been critically thinking about the content.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:07:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-more-intuitive-default-legend-labels/idc-p/971419#M9309</guid>
      <dc:creator>CharlesGartside1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-16T13:07:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcGIS Pro - more Intuitive Default Legend Labels</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-more-intuitive-default-legend-labels/idc-p/971420#M9310</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Exactly, when read, &amp;lt;=7 looks like "This category contains every value that is less than or equal to 7." But it there are lower values, that's never the case.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 15:11:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-more-intuitive-default-legend-labels/idc-p/971420#M9310</guid>
      <dc:creator>deleted-user-sYHsW3p_gN5o</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-16T15:11:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcGIS Pro - more Intuitive Default Legend Labels</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-more-intuitive-default-legend-labels/idc-p/971421#M9311</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Some discussion about this can be found &lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://community.esri.com/thread/200495-legend-range-instead-of-less-than-equals-to"&gt;here&lt;/A&gt;, they are "thinking about it"....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2019 17:17:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-more-intuitive-default-legend-labels/idc-p/971421#M9311</guid>
      <dc:creator>DuncanHornby</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-15T17:17:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcGIS Pro - more Intuitive Default Legend Labels</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-more-intuitive-default-legend-labels/idc-p/971422#M9312</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for posting that - and to posting this idea to that thread as well!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2019 19:37:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-more-intuitive-default-legend-labels/idc-p/971422#M9312</guid>
      <dc:creator>deleted-user-sYHsW3p_gN5o</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-15T19:37:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcGIS Pro - more Intuitive Default Legend Labels</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-more-intuitive-default-legend-labels/idc-p/971423#M9313</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I'm understanding correctly, what you're suggesting for ArcGIS Pro as "intuitive" ranges, is actually the method used for labeling classes in ArcGIS Desktop. ArcGIS Pro should never have used those technically incorrect "&amp;lt;=" labels in the first place.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2019 20:42:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-more-intuitive-default-legend-labels/idc-p/971423#M9313</guid>
      <dc:creator>ehallisey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-15T20:42:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcGIS Pro - more Intuitive Default Legend Labels</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-more-intuitive-default-legend-labels/idc-p/971424#M9314</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Same problem - work around go into ArcMap bring your data in create the new "intuitive" ranges - save as a layer file and open Pro bring in the layer file saved from ArcMap. But Pro??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 18:53:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-more-intuitive-default-legend-labels/idc-p/971424#M9314</guid>
      <dc:creator>JasonGillow1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T18:53:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcGIS Pro - more Intuitive Default Legend Labels</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-more-intuitive-default-legend-labels/idc-p/971425#M9315</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have this exact frustration, the default in Pro is a huge waste of time for me. I want the intuitive way back. I have Pro 2.2.4. Has this been addressed in this release ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2019 15:45:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-more-intuitive-default-legend-labels/idc-p/971425#M9315</guid>
      <dc:creator>IsabelCorcos</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-14T15:45:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcGIS Pro - more Intuitive Default Legend Labels</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-more-intuitive-default-legend-labels/idc-p/971426#M9316</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nope not in 2.3 either&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2019 12:45:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-more-intuitive-default-legend-labels/idc-p/971426#M9316</guid>
      <dc:creator>JasonGillow1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-17T12:45:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcGIS Pro - more Intuitive Default Legend Labels</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-more-intuitive-default-legend-labels/idc-p/971427#M9317</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, the &amp;lt;= approach is HIGHLY unorthodox and misleading. It is not supported in the cartographic literature or in practice.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And... would it kill ESRI to call the graduated color map by its true name? It's a CHOROPLETH!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2019 17:55:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-more-intuitive-default-legend-labels/idc-p/971427#M9317</guid>
      <dc:creator>HughHoward</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-03T17:55:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcGIS Pro - more Intuitive Default Legend Labels</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-more-intuitive-default-legend-labels/idc-p/971428#M9318</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have 2.4 now and it's still not fixed. Does anyone know of a&amp;nbsp;script or model that could do this? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2019 16:07:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-more-intuitive-default-legend-labels/idc-p/971428#M9318</guid>
      <dc:creator>IsabelCorcos</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-19T16:07:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcGIS Pro - more Intuitive Default Legend Labels</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-more-intuitive-default-legend-labels/idc-p/971429#M9319</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any word yet on if this will ever be implemented? Just upgraded to 2.5 and it is still not an option.&amp;nbsp; Just had yet another client ask for ranges (e.g. 0-100) instead of "≤" (e.g.&amp;nbsp;≤100) for legends. It is very frustrating to keep having to make these legend fixes manually.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2020 22:15:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-more-intuitive-default-legend-labels/idc-p/971429#M9319</guid>
      <dc:creator>MollyBarth</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-12T22:15:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcGIS Pro - more Intuitive Default Legend Labels</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-more-intuitive-default-legend-labels/idc-p/971430#M9320</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the latest (frustrating) update. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2020 22:21:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-more-intuitive-default-legend-labels/idc-p/971430#M9320</guid>
      <dc:creator>IsabelCorcos</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-12T22:21:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcGIS Pro - more Intuitive Default Legend Labels</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-more-intuitive-default-legend-labels/idc-p/971431#M9321</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I keep having clients ask for it as that is what they received when I used ArcMap.&amp;nbsp; Hopefully enough people will ask for this, it can be added to a new release.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2020 21:47:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-more-intuitive-default-legend-labels/idc-p/971431#M9321</guid>
      <dc:creator>WendyThomas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-07-15T21:47:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcGIS Pro - more Intuitive Default Legend Labels</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-more-intuitive-default-legend-labels/idc-p/971432#M9322</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This really makes me missed Arc Map because the simple things like what we speaking about now becomes time consuming and tedious work. I don't know understand why a&amp;nbsp;range&amp;nbsp;for values is not set as the default. This is ridiculous.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2020 19:19:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-more-intuitive-default-legend-labels/idc-p/971432#M9322</guid>
      <dc:creator>Christopheraime</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-07-20T19:19:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcGIS Pro - more Intuitive Default Legend Labels</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-more-intuitive-default-legend-labels/idc-p/971433#M9323</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;A million times yes! It's terrible design for a LEGEND, of all things. The most important thing on a map.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2020 21:51:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-more-intuitive-default-legend-labels/idc-p/971433#M9323</guid>
      <dc:creator>IsabelCorcos</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-23T21:51:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcGIS Pro - more Intuitive Default Legend Labels - Status changed to: Implemented</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-more-intuitive-default-legend-labels/idc-p/1010434#M14606</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Implemented in ArcGIS Pro 2.7!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;See&amp;nbsp;&lt;LI-MESSAGE title="Ideas in ArcGIS Pro 2.7: Something to Celebrate" uid="1009452" url="https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-ideas-blog/ideas-in-arcgis-pro-2-7-something-to-celebrate/m-p/1009452#U1009452" discussion_style_icon_css="lia-mention-container-editor-message lia-img-icon-blog-thread lia-fa-icon lia-fa-blog lia-fa-thread lia-fa"&gt;&lt;/LI-MESSAGE&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also check out &lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/get-started/whats-new-in-arcgis-pro.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;what's new in ArcGIS Pro 2.7&lt;/A&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2020 23:40:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-more-intuitive-default-legend-labels/idc-p/1010434#M14606</guid>
      <dc:creator>KoryKramer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-16T23:40:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcGIS Pro - more Intuitive Default Legend Labels</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-more-intuitive-default-legend-labels/idc-p/1059299#M15981</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/129401"&gt;@KoryKramer&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;I really can't see how this is intuitive. Try labeling a legend where the values diverge around zero! The negative values are a mess and not only look awful, it is far less intuitive than the old way.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please at least give us the option to choose either labeling style. I thought the ≤ labels were a brilliant design change.&amp;nbsp;Is there any way I can reset this to the old format?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I now have to edit the legend labels manually in my template maps. For a job that used to take me 1-2 hours to output 10 maps, now takes an entire day or more.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Josh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="JoshLeyshon_0-1621397290684.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/13596i36B433F9A65AC196/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="JoshLeyshon_0-1621397290684.png" alt="JoshLeyshon_0-1621397290684.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2021 04:23:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-more-intuitive-default-legend-labels/idc-p/1059299#M15981</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoshLeyshon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-19T04:23:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcGIS Pro - more Intuitive Default Legend Labels</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-more-intuitive-default-legend-labels/idc-p/1059367#M15983</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/117220"&gt;@JoshLeyshon&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We didn't declare this intuitive; that is how the idea was posted.&amp;nbsp; The way that symbol classes were labeled in ArcGIS Pro was different than how it had been done in ArcMap, and there was enough feedback through this idea that it caused us to change it to match how it was done in ArcMap.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I understand your comment, but to make this actionable, please submit your idea to "&lt;SPAN&gt;give us the option to choose either labeling style. I thought the ≤ labels were a brilliant design change."&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thank you&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2021 12:20:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-more-intuitive-default-legend-labels/idc-p/1059367#M15983</guid>
      <dc:creator>KoryKramer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-19T12:20:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

