<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Geologic Surfaces (Raster Grids) with Discontinuities in ArcGIS Pro Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/geologic-surfaces-raster-grids-with/idi-p/970343</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Please try harder to recognize that geologic surfaces have discontinuities.&amp;nbsp; They are not just a solid, continuous, rectangular grid.&amp;nbsp; There are often linear discontinuities (faults), exclusive holes (fault gaps, salt penetration), and inclusive edges (pinch-outs, erosion, or end of interpretation).&amp;nbsp; And these features need to be displayed as nice smooth features, not stair-steps, zig-zags, scallops, or other unappealing and non-geologic shapes.&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Value&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&amp;nbsp; many geoscientists refuse to accept or embrace ArcGIS because of these shortcomings.&amp;nbsp; Some of it is purely the aesthetic appeal of the resulting maps, and some is more significant deficiencies in modeling and making calculations on the geologic surfaces.&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;The&amp;nbsp;Petroleum User Group (&lt;STRONG&gt;PUG)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;has been pushing this subject for years, as shortcomings in the ability to adequately process and display these features are a significant barrier to increased usage in our industry.&amp;nbsp; Progress has been made, but there is still more needed.&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Recognizing progress, we are glad to see:&lt;BR /&gt;1. Spline with Barriers:&amp;nbsp; this interpolation tool solves the issue of faults, but the python implementation has some flaws (shift due to rotation) and performs quite poorly in comparison to other interpolation tools.&lt;BR /&gt;2. Contour with Barriers:&amp;nbsp; this was a good step forward, but fell short as the Polygon option was never implemented.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Following are the next priorities, which are each documented separately with additional details.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;1. Blank Grid&lt;/STRONG&gt;/Raster inside Exclusive Polygons:&amp;nbsp; this seems like it should be extremely easy, please just do it.&amp;nbsp; Reference: &lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/ideas/7299" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://community.esri.com/ideas/7299&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;2. Color Fill&lt;/STRONG&gt; Contour Polygons:&amp;nbsp; finish implementation in Contour with Barriers.&amp;nbsp; Reference:&amp;nbsp; &lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/ideas/1387" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://community.esri.com/ideas/1387&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;3. Spline with Barriers&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&amp;nbsp; resolve shortcomings in the implementation mentioned above.&amp;nbsp; Reference: &lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/ideas/7309" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://community.esri.com/ideas/7309&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Note&lt;/STRONG&gt;: this is a strategic request, consolidating several issues from the Petroleum User Group: &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://www.pugonline.org/index.php?q=the-list/ascending" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://www.pugonline.org/index.php?q=the-list/ascending&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For additional information, contact&amp;nbsp; &lt;A href="mailto:Rich@Priemere.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;Rich@Priemere.com&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;!--  content transformation source ID: 087E00000004b0G  --&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2022 23:36:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RichPriem</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-03-02T23:36:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Geologic Surfaces (Raster Grids) with Discontinuities</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/geologic-surfaces-raster-grids-with/idi-p/970343</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Please try harder to recognize that geologic surfaces have discontinuities.&amp;nbsp; They are not just a solid, continuous, rectangular grid.&amp;nbsp; There are often linear discontinuities (faults), exclusive holes (fault gaps, salt penetration), and inclusive edges (pinch-outs, erosion, or end of interpretation).&amp;nbsp; And these features need to be displayed as nice smooth features, not stair-steps, zig-zags, scallops, or other unappealing and non-geologic shapes.&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Value&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&amp;nbsp; many geoscientists refuse to accept or embrace ArcGIS because of these shortcomings.&amp;nbsp; Some of it is purely the aesthetic appeal of the resulting maps, and some is more significant deficiencies in modeling and making calculations on the geologic surfaces.&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;The&amp;nbsp;Petroleum User Group (&lt;STRONG&gt;PUG)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;has been pushing this subject for years, as shortcomings in the ability to adequately process and display these features are a significant barrier to increased usage in our industry.&amp;nbsp; Progress has been made, but there is still more needed.&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Recognizing progress, we are glad to see:&lt;BR /&gt;1. Spline with Barriers:&amp;nbsp; this interpolation tool solves the issue of faults, but the python implementation has some flaws (shift due to rotation) and performs quite poorly in comparison to other interpolation tools.&lt;BR /&gt;2. Contour with Barriers:&amp;nbsp; this was a good step forward, but fell short as the Polygon option was never implemented.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Following are the next priorities, which are each documented separately with additional details.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;1. Blank Grid&lt;/STRONG&gt;/Raster inside Exclusive Polygons:&amp;nbsp; this seems like it should be extremely easy, please just do it.&amp;nbsp; Reference: &lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/ideas/7299" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://community.esri.com/ideas/7299&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;2. Color Fill&lt;/STRONG&gt; Contour Polygons:&amp;nbsp; finish implementation in Contour with Barriers.&amp;nbsp; Reference:&amp;nbsp; &lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/ideas/1387" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://community.esri.com/ideas/1387&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;3. Spline with Barriers&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&amp;nbsp; resolve shortcomings in the implementation mentioned above.&amp;nbsp; Reference: &lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/ideas/7309" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://community.esri.com/ideas/7309&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Note&lt;/STRONG&gt;: this is a strategic request, consolidating several issues from the Petroleum User Group: &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://www.pugonline.org/index.php?q=the-list/ascending" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://www.pugonline.org/index.php?q=the-list/ascending&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For additional information, contact&amp;nbsp; &lt;A href="mailto:Rich@Priemere.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;Rich@Priemere.com&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;!--  content transformation source ID: 087E00000004b0G  --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2022 23:36:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/geologic-surfaces-raster-grids-with/idi-p/970343</guid>
      <dc:creator>RichPriem</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-02T23:36:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Geologic Surfaces (Raster Grids) with Discontinuities</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/geologic-surfaces-raster-grids-with/idc-p/970344#M9095</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;Forgot to mention that Maplex labeling of contours was another great step forward on this subject!

&lt;!-- content transformation source ID: 00aE00000029UDt --&gt;

&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 12:44:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/geologic-surfaces-raster-grids-with/idc-p/970344#M9095</guid>
      <dc:creator>RichPriem</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-01T12:44:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Geologic Surfaces (Raster Grids) with Discontinuities</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/geologic-surfaces-raster-grids-with/idc-p/970345#M9096</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;The ideas links above with the "visual.force.com" address should work if you are already logged into the ideas site (which uses SalesForce VisualForce), but the more generic links are below.&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Geologic Surfaces (Raster Grids) with Discontinuities&amp;nbsp; (this idea)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/ideas/7310" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.esri.com/ideas/7310&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Blank Grid/Raster inside Exclusive Polygons&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/ideas/7299" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.esri.com/ideas/7299&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Contour Polygons&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/ideas/1387" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.esri.com/ideas/1387&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Spline with Barriers Deficiencies&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/ideas/7309" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.esri.com/ideas/7309&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;

&lt;!-- content transformation source ID: 00aE00000029X1E --&gt;

&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2021 08:08:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/geologic-surfaces-raster-grids-with/idc-p/970345#M9096</guid>
      <dc:creator>WillyLynch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-22T08:08:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Geologic Surfaces (Raster Grids) with Discontinuities</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/geologic-surfaces-raster-grids-with/idc-p/970346#M9097</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;I thought we solved this problem?&amp;nbsp; You can grid with faults now.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;"And these features need to be displayed as nice smooth features, not stair-steps, zig-zags, scallops, or other unappealing and non-geologic shapes"&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;You can solve this with geodatabase representations if you want it to look something other than the actual geometry.&amp;nbsp; You can also generalize the feature.

&lt;!-- content transformation source ID: 00aE00000029Xlk --&gt;

&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:10:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/geologic-surfaces-raster-grids-with/idc-p/970346#M9097</guid>
      <dc:creator>JosephWallis1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-03T13:10:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Geologic Surfaces (Raster Grids) with Discontinuities</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/geologic-surfaces-raster-grids-with/idc-p/970347#M9098</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;
	From Esri: We still need addtional information on this requirement.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;	ArcGIS Ideas Moderator&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;!-- content transformation source ID: 00aE0000002zXS7 --&gt;

&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 21:53:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/geologic-surfaces-raster-grids-with/idc-p/970347#M9098</guid>
      <dc:creator>MichaelHogan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-14T21:53:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Geologic Surfaces (Raster Grids) with Discontinuities</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/geologic-surfaces-raster-grids-with/idc-p/970348#M9099</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;mhogan:&amp;nbsp; thanks for reply.&amp;nbsp; Could you pose some specific questions to clarify, or put me (&lt;A href="mailto:Rich@Priemere.com" target="_blank"&gt;Rich@Priemere.com&lt;/A&gt;) in contact with a person to discuss in more detail?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;inteller: no, visual problems must be resolved at the source. It is not possible to fix with GDB representations, generalizing features, or any other post processing.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;inteller: yes, can grid with faults, but still issues with this process, as documented in separate item for Spline with Barriers.

&lt;!-- content transformation source ID: 00aE000000304vT --&gt;

&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 14:07:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/geologic-surfaces-raster-grids-with/idc-p/970348#M9099</guid>
      <dc:creator>RichPriem</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-08T14:07:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Geologic Surfaces (Raster Grids) with Discontinuities</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/geologic-surfaces-raster-grids-with/idc-p/970349#M9100</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV id="cke_pastebin" style="width: 1px; height: 1px;"&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;SPAN style=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;Pug Idea List 2014:&amp;nbsp; Kteve Kopp, ESRI Lead&lt;/SPAN&gt;Pug Idea List 2014:&amp;nbsp; Steve Kopp, ESRI Lead
&lt;TABLE border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="width: 308pt;" width="411"&gt;&lt;COLGROUP&gt;&lt;COL style="width: 308pt;" width="411" /&gt;&lt;/COLGROUP&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR height="38" style="height: 29.1pt;"&gt;&lt;TD colspan="1" rowspan="1" class="xl67" height="38" style="width: 308pt; height: 29.1pt; background-color: transparent;" width="411"&gt;
				&lt;FONT face="Calibri"&gt;3 issues with this one. Blank grid values was addressed by a sample last year on the resource center.&lt;SPAN style=""&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;FONT class="font5"&gt;&lt;FONT color="#4f81bd"&gt;Comment from Rich: It should be part of the standard tool kt, and bundled with other things. People may not be able to find it.&lt;SPAN style=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;FONT size="3"&gt;Color Fill: Was documented, but the implementation didn't handle NULL values very well.&lt;SPAN style=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;Also need to be able to handle barriers.&lt;SPAN style=""&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size="3"&gt;Spline with Barriers: Script had some bugs in it, and have to pass the data in a certain way.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;SPAN style=""&gt;&lt;FONT size="3"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;

&lt;!-- content transformation source ID: 00aE0000006EsLO --&gt;

&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 14:34:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/geologic-surfaces-raster-grids-with/idc-p/970349#M9100</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-11T14:34:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

