<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Allow sub-groups within License Manager for concurrent licenses in ArcGIS Pro Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/allow-sub-groups-within-license-manager-for/idi-p/964056</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The abbility to have multiple groups/pools of license on the same license server would be very beneficial.&amp;nbsp; Each group could be assigned licenses from any level (Basic, Standard, Advances) and extensions.&amp;nbsp; Users can then be assigned to the license groups via Active Directory OU's/groups,&amp;nbsp;or direct naming each user account.&amp;nbsp; Any license should be able to be in one to many license groups, as with users.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Situation:&lt;BR /&gt;We have a main pool of licenses, but there are several departments that want to ensure their users can access a license through the day.&amp;nbsp; Single Use is too restrictive, and the Concurrent Use model would be perfect for the departments needs.&amp;nbsp; It would be a nightmare to get the IT department to give us another license server, nor would it make much sense to have two different license managers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;!--  content transformation source ID: 087E00000005EZ7  --&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 23:39:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>EricKopras</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-07-23T23:39:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Allow sub-groups within License Manager for concurrent licenses</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/allow-sub-groups-within-license-manager-for/idi-p/964056</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The abbility to have multiple groups/pools of license on the same license server would be very beneficial.&amp;nbsp; Each group could be assigned licenses from any level (Basic, Standard, Advances) and extensions.&amp;nbsp; Users can then be assigned to the license groups via Active Directory OU's/groups,&amp;nbsp;or direct naming each user account.&amp;nbsp; Any license should be able to be in one to many license groups, as with users.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Situation:&lt;BR /&gt;We have a main pool of licenses, but there are several departments that want to ensure their users can access a license through the day.&amp;nbsp; Single Use is too restrictive, and the Concurrent Use model would be perfect for the departments needs.&amp;nbsp; It would be a nightmare to get the IT department to give us another license server, nor would it make much sense to have two different license managers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;!--  content transformation source ID: 087E00000005EZ7  --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 23:39:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/allow-sub-groups-within-license-manager-for/idi-p/964056</guid>
      <dc:creator>EricKopras</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-23T23:39:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

