<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Use best fit when converting line segments in ArcGIS Pro Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/use-best-fit-when-converting-line-segments/idi-p/957164</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;Currently, when you convert a segment to a bezier curve or circular arc, ArcMap sets the control points to create a big, conspicuous curve. &amp;nbsp;This interrupts the workflow because it requires the user to adjust the control points to a more meaningful shape, and leaves the user vulnerable to accidently creating self-intersecting geometry that takes extra time to repair or undo. &amp;nbsp;It would be better to change this behavior (or at least provide an option) so that it affects the segment&amp;nbsp;&lt;I&gt;type&lt;/I&gt;&amp;nbsp;but not the&amp;nbsp;&lt;I&gt;shape&lt;/I&gt;, instead setting the control points to match or best approximate the original segment. &amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As an example, I have been converting some complex features, that consist of mixed straight sections and "curved" sections (approximated by many straight segments), into features with true curves. &amp;nbsp;Short of manually editing each section that needs adjustment, I have two main procedures to use:
&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;For features with mostly curves, I "Generalize" to remove nearly colinear points, then "Smooth" to produce the bezier segments, and finally revert the rest back to straight segments. &amp;nbsp;Some of the&amp;nbsp;curved segments now&amp;nbsp;still have extra bulges (mostly at corners) that need to be adjusted.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;For features that are mostly straight segments, I again "Generalize", then manually convert the sections that need to be curved into beziers. &amp;nbsp;Each segment must be changed to bezier, severely distorting the shape, then manually adjusted to match the original shape and produce a continuous curve.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;SPAN style=""&gt;A possible exception/extension to always "best fitting" the shape could be when converting a segment to bezier that lies between two other beziers; in this case it may be desirable to also try to produce a continuous curve at the endpoints.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;(I think this idea is similar to&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://c.na9.visual.force.com/apex/ideaView?id=087E00000004Pj0IAE" target="_blank"&gt;https://c.na9.visual.force.com/apex/ideaView?id=087E00000004Pj0IAE&lt;/A&gt;, but I'd specifically like to see the behavior of the editor change rather than have a new tool.)

&lt;!-- content transformation source ID: 087E0000000kB0T --&gt;

&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2015 20:24:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>BrandonNelson1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-12-18T20:24:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Use best fit when converting line segments</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/use-best-fit-when-converting-line-segments/idi-p/957164</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;Currently, when you convert a segment to a bezier curve or circular arc, ArcMap sets the control points to create a big, conspicuous curve. &amp;nbsp;This interrupts the workflow because it requires the user to adjust the control points to a more meaningful shape, and leaves the user vulnerable to accidently creating self-intersecting geometry that takes extra time to repair or undo. &amp;nbsp;It would be better to change this behavior (or at least provide an option) so that it affects the segment&amp;nbsp;&lt;I&gt;type&lt;/I&gt;&amp;nbsp;but not the&amp;nbsp;&lt;I&gt;shape&lt;/I&gt;, instead setting the control points to match or best approximate the original segment. &amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As an example, I have been converting some complex features, that consist of mixed straight sections and "curved" sections (approximated by many straight segments), into features with true curves. &amp;nbsp;Short of manually editing each section that needs adjustment, I have two main procedures to use:
&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;For features with mostly curves, I "Generalize" to remove nearly colinear points, then "Smooth" to produce the bezier segments, and finally revert the rest back to straight segments. &amp;nbsp;Some of the&amp;nbsp;curved segments now&amp;nbsp;still have extra bulges (mostly at corners) that need to be adjusted.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;For features that are mostly straight segments, I again "Generalize", then manually convert the sections that need to be curved into beziers. &amp;nbsp;Each segment must be changed to bezier, severely distorting the shape, then manually adjusted to match the original shape and produce a continuous curve.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;SPAN style=""&gt;A possible exception/extension to always "best fitting" the shape could be when converting a segment to bezier that lies between two other beziers; in this case it may be desirable to also try to produce a continuous curve at the endpoints.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;(I think this idea is similar to&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://c.na9.visual.force.com/apex/ideaView?id=087E00000004Pj0IAE" target="_blank"&gt;https://c.na9.visual.force.com/apex/ideaView?id=087E00000004Pj0IAE&lt;/A&gt;, but I'd specifically like to see the behavior of the editor change rather than have a new tool.)

&lt;!-- content transformation source ID: 087E0000000kB0T --&gt;

&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2015 20:24:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/use-best-fit-when-converting-line-segments/idi-p/957164</guid>
      <dc:creator>BrandonNelson1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-12-18T20:24:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

