<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea PLS-CADD in ArcGIS Pro Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/pls-cadd/idi-p/938558</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Interoperability with PLS-CADD files is a must!!!!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;!--  content transformation source ID: 087300000008DIO  --&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2024 20:02:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>BobBernard</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-05-02T20:02:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PLS-CADD</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/pls-cadd/idi-p/938558</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Interoperability with PLS-CADD files is a must!!!!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;!--  content transformation source ID: 087300000008DIO  --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2024 20:02:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/pls-cadd/idi-p/938558</guid>
      <dc:creator>BobBernard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-02T20:02:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PLS-CADD</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/pls-cadd/idc-p/938559#M4850</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, I aggree. This make&amp;nbsp;sense because the&amp;nbsp;vast majority of utilities are using PLS-CADD software for design of Power lines!&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;!-- content transformation source ID: 00a30000009erEr --&gt;

&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 15:48:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/pls-cadd/idc-p/938559#M4850</guid>
      <dc:creator>DaliborKladar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-25T15:48:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PLS-CADD</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/pls-cadd/idc-p/938560#M4851</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;This would be huge,

&lt;!-- content transformation source ID: 00a3000000BdQOz --&gt;

&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 19:12:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/pls-cadd/idc-p/938560#M4851</guid>
      <dc:creator>JohnThompson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-08-30T19:12:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PLS-CADD - Status changed to: Closed</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/pls-cadd/idc-p/1317880#M25942</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;PLS-CADD exports to DXF and pole spotting list such as MS Excel or other tables which can already be loaded in ArcGIS Pro.&amp;nbsp; If further interoperability is needed, FME by Safe Software could be a viable option.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2023 15:19:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/pls-cadd/idc-p/1317880#M25942</guid>
      <dc:creator>RemiMyers</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-08-11T15:19:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

