<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea 3D benchmark tool in ArcGIS Pro Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/3d-benchmark-tool/idi-p/922822</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Create a benchmark tool for evaluating 3D performance of ArcScene and ArcGlobe and enable users to publish their configuration and benchmark results. Results should be in both frames per second and 3D features/objects per second.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Standard ESRI provided/generated data set would be used in benchmark.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 00:56:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ZorkoSostaric</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-05-16T00:56:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>3D benchmark tool</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/3d-benchmark-tool/idi-p/922822</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Create a benchmark tool for evaluating 3D performance of ArcScene and ArcGlobe and enable users to publish their configuration and benchmark results. Results should be in both frames per second and 3D features/objects per second.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Standard ESRI provided/generated data set would be used in benchmark.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 00:56:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/3d-benchmark-tool/idi-p/922822</guid>
      <dc:creator>ZorkoSostaric</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-16T00:56:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 3D benchmark tool - Status changed to: Closed</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/3d-benchmark-tool/idc-p/1065330#M16153</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I ran across this idea and thought I'd mention that we recently did this for ArcGIS Pro:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.esri.com/arcgis-blog/products/arcgis-pro/announcements/announcing-the-arcgis-pro-performance-assessment-tool-pat/" target="_blank"&gt;Announcing the ArcGIS Pro Performance Assessment Tool (PAT)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2021 22:14:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/3d-benchmark-tool/idc-p/1065330#M16153</guid>
      <dc:creator>KoryKramer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-04T22:14:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 3D benchmark tool - Status changed to: Implemented</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/3d-benchmark-tool/idc-p/1473368#M30219</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Implemented by means of the&lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/get-started/pro-performance-tool-overview.htm" target="_self"&gt; ArcGIS Pro Performance Assessment Tool&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 00:56:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/3d-benchmark-tool/idc-p/1473368#M30219</guid>
      <dc:creator>CraigWilliams</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-16T00:56:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

