<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea LAS Datasets to show actual data coverage not just tile area in ArcGIS Pro Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/las-datasets-to-show-actual-data-coverage-not-just/idi-p/934715</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's&amp;nbsp; too hard to see the actual LAS point data coverage extent. A LAS Dataset shows only the tile footprint area until you zoom in so that only a few tiles are within the view frame. One consequence of this is that it's very easy to omit areas or think you have coverage when you don't.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV style="direction: ltr;"&gt;&lt;TABLE border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="direction: ltr; border-collapse: collapse; border: 1pt solid #A3A3A3;"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD style="vertical-align: top; width: 3.809in; padding: 4pt 4pt 4pt 4pt; border: 1pt solid #A3A3A3;"&gt;&lt;P lang="en-US" style="margin: 0in; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;LASD says we have coverage in red and purple areas&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD style="vertical-align: top; width: 3.7423in; padding: 4pt 4pt 4pt 4pt; border: 1pt solid #A3A3A3;"&gt;&lt;P lang="en-US" style="margin: 0in; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;However actual LAS point coverage is incomplete&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD style="vertical-align: top; width: 3.809in; padding: 4pt 4pt 4pt 4pt; border: 1pt solid #A3A3A3;"&gt;&lt;IMG __jive_id="500413" alt="LAS Dataset representation of coverage area" class="jive-emoji image-1 jive-image j-img-original" src="/legacyfs/online/500413_2020-07-15 11_14_44-Locale-contours - Marsh Lake - ArcGIS Pro.png" /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD style="vertical-align: top; width: 3.7291in; padding: 4pt 4pt 4pt 4pt; border: 1pt solid #A3A3A3;"&gt;&lt;IMG __jive_id="500441" alt="actual extent of LAS data points" class="jive-emoji jive-image image-2 j-img-original" src="/legacyfs/online/500441_2020-07-15 11_16_03-Clipboard.png" /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P lang="en-US"&gt;We ordered data to cover areas left out of the original purchase. When accepting the order we thought it was complete because the LASD showed it that way. It was only weeks later when trying to actually use it that we discovered there'd been a mistake in the Area of Interest. It would have been trivial to clear up that mistake with vendor at moment of delivery. However with the passage of time it is now a whole new purchase exercise.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P lang="en-US"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P lang="en-US"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Work around:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;For all LASD run&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Point Statics as Raster&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;. For performance use a cell size an order of magnitude larger than the average point density (10m works well for our data).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P lang="en-US"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P lang="en-US"&gt;It would still be better to have a built in LASD option though. Relying on side-car rasters means care and attention is needed to ensure the raster stays in sync with the LASD contents. It could be rolled into&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Create LAS Dataset&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;and&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Add Files to LASD&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;as part of the generating statistics stage, following the model used for generating and consuming overviews for rasters.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P lang="en-US"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P lang="en-US"&gt;Fig: LASD tile boundaries overlain on a point-stats raster. We&amp;nbsp;quickly and effortlessly identify the data gaps without any extra work. No endless rounds of zooming closer and panning and refreshes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P lang="en-US"&gt;&lt;IMG __jive_id="500491" class="image-1 jive-image" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/500534_pastedImage_1.png" style="border: 0px; margin: 2px 20px 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2020 22:05:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MattWilkie1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-07-15T22:05:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>LAS Datasets to show actual data coverage not just tile area</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/las-datasets-to-show-actual-data-coverage-not-just/idi-p/934715</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's&amp;nbsp; too hard to see the actual LAS point data coverage extent. A LAS Dataset shows only the tile footprint area until you zoom in so that only a few tiles are within the view frame. One consequence of this is that it's very easy to omit areas or think you have coverage when you don't.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV style="direction: ltr;"&gt;&lt;TABLE border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="direction: ltr; border-collapse: collapse; border: 1pt solid #A3A3A3;"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD style="vertical-align: top; width: 3.809in; padding: 4pt 4pt 4pt 4pt; border: 1pt solid #A3A3A3;"&gt;&lt;P lang="en-US" style="margin: 0in; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;LASD says we have coverage in red and purple areas&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD style="vertical-align: top; width: 3.7423in; padding: 4pt 4pt 4pt 4pt; border: 1pt solid #A3A3A3;"&gt;&lt;P lang="en-US" style="margin: 0in; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11.0pt; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;However actual LAS point coverage is incomplete&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD style="vertical-align: top; width: 3.809in; padding: 4pt 4pt 4pt 4pt; border: 1pt solid #A3A3A3;"&gt;&lt;IMG __jive_id="500413" alt="LAS Dataset representation of coverage area" class="jive-emoji image-1 jive-image j-img-original" src="/legacyfs/online/500413_2020-07-15 11_14_44-Locale-contours - Marsh Lake - ArcGIS Pro.png" /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD style="vertical-align: top; width: 3.7291in; padding: 4pt 4pt 4pt 4pt; border: 1pt solid #A3A3A3;"&gt;&lt;IMG __jive_id="500441" alt="actual extent of LAS data points" class="jive-emoji jive-image image-2 j-img-original" src="/legacyfs/online/500441_2020-07-15 11_16_03-Clipboard.png" /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P lang="en-US"&gt;We ordered data to cover areas left out of the original purchase. When accepting the order we thought it was complete because the LASD showed it that way. It was only weeks later when trying to actually use it that we discovered there'd been a mistake in the Area of Interest. It would have been trivial to clear up that mistake with vendor at moment of delivery. However with the passage of time it is now a whole new purchase exercise.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P lang="en-US"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P lang="en-US"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Work around:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;For all LASD run&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Point Statics as Raster&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;. For performance use a cell size an order of magnitude larger than the average point density (10m works well for our data).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P lang="en-US"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P lang="en-US"&gt;It would still be better to have a built in LASD option though. Relying on side-car rasters means care and attention is needed to ensure the raster stays in sync with the LASD contents. It could be rolled into&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Create LAS Dataset&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;and&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Add Files to LASD&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;as part of the generating statistics stage, following the model used for generating and consuming overviews for rasters.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P lang="en-US"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P lang="en-US"&gt;Fig: LASD tile boundaries overlain on a point-stats raster. We&amp;nbsp;quickly and effortlessly identify the data gaps without any extra work. No endless rounds of zooming closer and panning and refreshes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P lang="en-US"&gt;&lt;IMG __jive_id="500491" class="image-1 jive-image" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/500534_pastedImage_1.png" style="border: 0px; margin: 2px 20px 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2020 22:05:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/las-datasets-to-show-actual-data-coverage-not-just/idi-p/934715</guid>
      <dc:creator>MattWilkie1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-07-15T22:05:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LAS Datasets to show actual data coverage not just tile area</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/las-datasets-to-show-actual-data-coverage-not-just/idc-p/1527478#M31774</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We now have LAS dataset pyramids for display. Once you build a pyramid you no longer need to zoom in a lot in order for the points to show up.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2024 21:27:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/las-datasets-to-show-actual-data-coverage-not-just/idc-p/1527478#M31774</guid>
      <dc:creator>Clayton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-26T21:27:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LAS Datasets to show actual data coverage not just tile area - Status changed to: Implemented</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/las-datasets-to-show-actual-data-coverage-not-just/idc-p/1557058#M32771</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Since we now have LAS dataset pyramids the data will show up without having to zoom in very much. Consequently, considering this implemented.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2024 23:11:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/las-datasets-to-show-actual-data-coverage-not-just/idc-p/1557058#M32771</guid>
      <dc:creator>ClaytonCrawford</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-08T23:11:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

