<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Split ArcGIS Pro into &amp;quot;Mapping&amp;quot; Vs &amp;quot;Analysis&amp;quot; in ArcGIS Pro Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/split-arcgis-pro-into-quot-mapping-quot-vs-quot/idi-p/1645214</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I saw someone else (Jeremy H.) suggest this on LinkedIn, and came here to upvote it, but I don't see it, so I'm reposting it! This is not my idea, but I cannot agree with his point more.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;His post read:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"please split ArcGIS Pro into two apps—one for analysis and one for mapping. Right now it’s trying to be everything at once, and it ends up feeling heavy. Analysts want a fast, stripped-down space for crunching data. Mappers want a clean, stable place to design without all the extra clutter. Two focused tools would be lighter, easier to learn, and way less frustrating than one overloaded platform.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Creating a side app stripped down for faster mapping would make production go faster, create less frustration, and prevent software updates from inadvertently interfering with the day to day."&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This is such a good idea. Often, when I want to make maps, Pro tries to hard to optimize geoprocessing tools, and when I'm trying to use geoprocessing tools, Pro wants to optimize visualizations and spends a lot of time spinning the wheel to update all my windows. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If there was a version of Pro for geoprocessing that was more dumbed down like Desktop, and a more visualization geared version - this would save a lot of headache for a lot of users!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many analysts want a less visually aesthetic software for just doing analysis that ran faster! I know several people who use QGIS or Desktop to avoid the spinning wheel of death in Pro.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/410783"&gt;@JeremyHuey&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;(I hope this is the correct Jeremy Huey?)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 15:20:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SarahMorrison</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-08-25T15:20:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Split ArcGIS Pro into "Mapping" Vs "Analysis"</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/split-arcgis-pro-into-quot-mapping-quot-vs-quot/idi-p/1645214</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I saw someone else (Jeremy H.) suggest this on LinkedIn, and came here to upvote it, but I don't see it, so I'm reposting it! This is not my idea, but I cannot agree with his point more.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;His post read:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"please split ArcGIS Pro into two apps—one for analysis and one for mapping. Right now it’s trying to be everything at once, and it ends up feeling heavy. Analysts want a fast, stripped-down space for crunching data. Mappers want a clean, stable place to design without all the extra clutter. Two focused tools would be lighter, easier to learn, and way less frustrating than one overloaded platform.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Creating a side app stripped down for faster mapping would make production go faster, create less frustration, and prevent software updates from inadvertently interfering with the day to day."&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This is such a good idea. Often, when I want to make maps, Pro tries to hard to optimize geoprocessing tools, and when I'm trying to use geoprocessing tools, Pro wants to optimize visualizations and spends a lot of time spinning the wheel to update all my windows. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If there was a version of Pro for geoprocessing that was more dumbed down like Desktop, and a more visualization geared version - this would save a lot of headache for a lot of users!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many analysts want a less visually aesthetic software for just doing analysis that ran faster! I know several people who use QGIS or Desktop to avoid the spinning wheel of death in Pro.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/410783"&gt;@JeremyHuey&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;(I hope this is the correct Jeremy Huey?)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 15:20:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/split-arcgis-pro-into-quot-mapping-quot-vs-quot/idi-p/1645214</guid>
      <dc:creator>SarahMorrison</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-25T15:20:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Split ArcGIS Pro into "Mapping" Vs "Analysis"</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/split-arcgis-pro-into-quot-mapping-quot-vs-quot/idc-p/1645218#M35970</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is me, and boy did my LinkedIn post go a bit more viral than I intended. I think when new bugs are fixed and updates are pushed, brand new issues arise. I just want to be able to spit out maps fast and effectively and think an a la carte platform that is wholly streamlined for this purpose would be nice.&amp;nbsp; Don't get me wrong, I use ESRI products and love them, teach with them, use them everyday... however, most of the work on a daily basis, for most GIS users, is still the creation of maps/graphics/simple calculations.&amp;nbsp; I just want my bread and butter to go smoother, and right now a lot of the simple copy paste, and basic mapping features seem to get bogged down at every corner.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bests and thanks for the support,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 15:35:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/split-arcgis-pro-into-quot-mapping-quot-vs-quot/idc-p/1645218#M35970</guid>
      <dc:creator>JeremyHuey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-25T15:35:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Split ArcGIS Pro into "Mapping" Vs "Analysis"</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/split-arcgis-pro-into-quot-mapping-quot-vs-quot/idc-p/1645301#M35993</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/169233"&gt;@SarahMorrison&lt;/a&gt;,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/410783"&gt;@JeremyHuey&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Interesting thought.&amp;nbsp; What are some specific examples of where Pro optimizes mapping/geoprocessing over another.&amp;nbsp; Are you referring only to speed issues or is there more to it?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;With Arcpy and ArcGIS for Python APIs, heavy lifting in geoprocessing or mapping can be done without even opening ArcGIS Pro GUI.&amp;nbsp; This might be closer to a pattern you desire currently out-of-the-box.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Tyler&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 19:20:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/split-arcgis-pro-into-quot-mapping-quot-vs-quot/idc-p/1645301#M35993</guid>
      <dc:creator>TylerT</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-25T19:20:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Split ArcGIS Pro into "Mapping" Vs "Analysis"</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/split-arcgis-pro-into-quot-mapping-quot-vs-quot/idc-p/1645428#M36007</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Upvoted&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/169233"&gt;@SarahMorrison&lt;/a&gt;,&amp;nbsp; but I also asked&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/410783"&gt;@JeremyHuey&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; in LinkedIn if he meant three separate apps as so many of us have been asking for standalone Catalog app for a decade.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":old_man:"&gt;👴&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I wonder if the Analysis component could be in Catalog. I used to use Catalog to run models and things outside of a map session for the reasons mentioned by Sarah.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 01:34:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/split-arcgis-pro-into-quot-mapping-quot-vs-quot/idc-p/1645428#M36007</guid>
      <dc:creator>RTPL_AU</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-26T01:34:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Split ArcGIS Pro into "Mapping" Vs "Analysis"</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/split-arcgis-pro-into-quot-mapping-quot-vs-quot/idc-p/1645601#M36014</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Folks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have been doing environmental consulting for 20 years.&amp;nbsp; Everyday I create anywhere from 5-20 graphics for multiple clients across different reports.&amp;nbsp; Some of them are more heavy lift operations with raster analysis, interpolations, drone imagery, etc.&amp;nbsp; MOST, of the stuff I do is show data collected in the field on a map layout.&amp;nbsp; This should be quick! Unfortunately, every few updates something happens where there is a hang up.&amp;nbsp; Currently in 3.5.2 when you copy ANYTHING... a layer, a text from one layout to another, and try to paste, the program hangs.&amp;nbsp; This is not my computer, I have checked with other analysts and they have the same issue.&amp;nbsp; I also teach at two junior colleges and run into this there.&amp;nbsp; It won't always happen, it happens intermittently, and it is a time killer. (Usually not on a fresh document, and usually not right at startup, almost always once you get a few maps/layouts deep).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is beside the point.&amp;nbsp; The point isn't if this one glitch can get fixed, it comes down to production level mapping needing a more streamlined environment, stripped down and away from all the clutter.&amp;nbsp; Even if this one is fixed, another thing will pop up (it has before and will again).&amp;nbsp; I just want to be able to slam out maps and think having a simple layout app away from all the other updates will fix this.&amp;nbsp; When you are pushing 8 pages of updates to one app, something is bound interfere with simple map production. For now, I started doing layouts in QGIS, it runs much faster.&amp;nbsp; No, I'm not anti ESRI, my office is filled with years of UC swag. I have been at this a long time and am a bit tired of all the bells and whistles when it prevents me from being a fast graphic producer; as I have been able to be in the past.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One streamlined, side app, dedicated to layouts, away from all the variable updates.&amp;nbsp; Stripped down for efficiency, please.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 14:16:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/split-arcgis-pro-into-quot-mapping-quot-vs-quot/idc-p/1645601#M36014</guid>
      <dc:creator>JeremyHuey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-26T14:16:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Split ArcGIS Pro into "Mapping" Vs "Analysis"</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/split-arcgis-pro-into-quot-mapping-quot-vs-quot/idc-p/1645627#M36015</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/277140"&gt;@RTPL_AU&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;A standalone catalog application like Desktop had would be helpful. I often open a dummy pro project with no layouts and no maps and complete catalog tasks. Having the catalog window in Pro is extremely helpful, especially for things like re-pathing broken links. I certainly wouldn't want it removed from a layout version for this reason. I work in a cloud based server environment, and while it's sometimes possible to pull things down and work locally, I cant avoid working on the server most of the time.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 14:35:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/split-arcgis-pro-into-quot-mapping-quot-vs-quot/idc-p/1645627#M36015</guid>
      <dc:creator>SarahMorrison</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-26T14:35:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

