<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Extrude Between should allow using rasters and not just TINs in ArcGIS Pro Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/extrude-between-should-allow-using-rasters-and-not/idi-p/1590622</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The Extrude Between tool is very useful for 3D modeling, but is is very limited by only allowing the use of TINs for the upper and lower surfaces.&amp;nbsp; The&amp;nbsp;Extrude Between tool should allow using rasters and not just TINs. For complex surfaces like subsurface geological formations with with a lot detail and local relief, It is hard to get the exported TIN to have enough resolution compared to the original detailed rasters of those surfaces&amp;nbsp;. The resultant multipatch from the&amp;nbsp;Extrude Between tool does not reflect the level of detail that is in the original formation top and bottom raster surfaces.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="MI_BASIN_3D_ANIMATED_GIF.gif" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/126644iFA953369D5846B09/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="MI_BASIN_3D_ANIMATED_GIF.gif" alt="MI_BASIN_3D_ANIMATED_GIF.gif" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 13:03:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JohnEsch2</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-02-28T13:03:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Extrude Between should allow using rasters and not just TINs</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/extrude-between-should-allow-using-rasters-and-not/idi-p/1590622</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The Extrude Between tool is very useful for 3D modeling, but is is very limited by only allowing the use of TINs for the upper and lower surfaces.&amp;nbsp; The&amp;nbsp;Extrude Between tool should allow using rasters and not just TINs. For complex surfaces like subsurface geological formations with with a lot detail and local relief, It is hard to get the exported TIN to have enough resolution compared to the original detailed rasters of those surfaces&amp;nbsp;. The resultant multipatch from the&amp;nbsp;Extrude Between tool does not reflect the level of detail that is in the original formation top and bottom raster surfaces.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="MI_BASIN_3D_ANIMATED_GIF.gif" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/126644iFA953369D5846B09/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="MI_BASIN_3D_ANIMATED_GIF.gif" alt="MI_BASIN_3D_ANIMATED_GIF.gif" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 13:03:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/extrude-between-should-allow-using-rasters-and-not/idi-p/1590622</guid>
      <dc:creator>JohnEsch2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-28T13:03:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

