<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Fix up PDF generation in Pro in ArcGIS Pro Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/fix-up-pdf-generation-in-pro/idi-p/1566599</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Due to the various 'improvements' in the export process Pro is prone to creating artefacts or noise in PDFs.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;There are other Ideas related to the lines Pro create when transparency is applied to a raster basemap.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;This Idea extends that to be more general as it is currently wasting my time in many more ways.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Example:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Logo in ArcMap mxd exported to PDF. (yes - the image is low res but good enough at the size used in the map.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="RTPL_AU_0-1733808338230.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/121265iDA5099FEDF51FA74/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="RTPL_AU_0-1733808338230.png" alt="RTPL_AU_0-1733808338230.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;To achieve a fancy new layer symbol style I imported the MXD into Pro, tweaked the layers as needed and exported to PDF with decent quality settings. The layers tweaked are unrelated to the logo.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is what Pro comes up with with export set to 0 compression:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="RTPL_AU_1-1733808460141.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/121266iE96086172AA1218B/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="RTPL_AU_1-1733808460141.png" alt="RTPL_AU_1-1733808460141.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="RTPL_AU_2-1733808715355.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/121267iB48F37E97F627A07/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="RTPL_AU_2-1733808715355.png" alt="RTPL_AU_2-1733808715355.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I've been trying various combinations but suspect I'll have to go through redoing a logo (that no-one is going to pay me for because it was fine before!!!)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I've now wasted a fair bit of time (yes - typing this included in the wasted metrics) to try to get this right and a quick job has just turned into a 'there goes the afternoon'.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I don't really care why this is - I care that Esri has made it my problem again.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/129401"&gt;@KoryKramer&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Please put someone on staff that has experience in both Map &amp;amp; Pro that can go through these type of things and give paying customers a product that makes them more efficient, not less. If you read this please publish a list of already known bugs in 3.4 - I haven't got the time now to upgrade &amp;amp; find them and prefer the devil I know - but still know it's the devil.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 19:05:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RTPL_AU</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-12-12T19:05:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Fix up PDF generation in Pro</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/fix-up-pdf-generation-in-pro/idi-p/1566599</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Due to the various 'improvements' in the export process Pro is prone to creating artefacts or noise in PDFs.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;There are other Ideas related to the lines Pro create when transparency is applied to a raster basemap.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;This Idea extends that to be more general as it is currently wasting my time in many more ways.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Example:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Logo in ArcMap mxd exported to PDF. (yes - the image is low res but good enough at the size used in the map.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="RTPL_AU_0-1733808338230.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/121265iDA5099FEDF51FA74/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="RTPL_AU_0-1733808338230.png" alt="RTPL_AU_0-1733808338230.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;To achieve a fancy new layer symbol style I imported the MXD into Pro, tweaked the layers as needed and exported to PDF with decent quality settings. The layers tweaked are unrelated to the logo.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is what Pro comes up with with export set to 0 compression:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="RTPL_AU_1-1733808460141.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/121266iE96086172AA1218B/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="RTPL_AU_1-1733808460141.png" alt="RTPL_AU_1-1733808460141.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="RTPL_AU_2-1733808715355.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/121267iB48F37E97F627A07/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="RTPL_AU_2-1733808715355.png" alt="RTPL_AU_2-1733808715355.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I've been trying various combinations but suspect I'll have to go through redoing a logo (that no-one is going to pay me for because it was fine before!!!)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I've now wasted a fair bit of time (yes - typing this included in the wasted metrics) to try to get this right and a quick job has just turned into a 'there goes the afternoon'.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I don't really care why this is - I care that Esri has made it my problem again.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/129401"&gt;@KoryKramer&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Please put someone on staff that has experience in both Map &amp;amp; Pro that can go through these type of things and give paying customers a product that makes them more efficient, not less. If you read this please publish a list of already known bugs in 3.4 - I haven't got the time now to upgrade &amp;amp; find them and prefer the devil I know - but still know it's the devil.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 19:05:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/fix-up-pdf-generation-in-pro/idi-p/1566599</guid>
      <dc:creator>RTPL_AU</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-12T19:05:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fix up PDF generation in Pro - Status changed to: Closed</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/fix-up-pdf-generation-in-pro/idc-p/1702911#M38378</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Original submitter did not provide a repro case, and we have been unable to reproduce the pictured artifact in current versions of ArcGIS Pro.&amp;nbsp; Also the "thin lines" artifact mentioned has been mitigated with the "&lt;STRONG&gt;Export raster content as a single tile&lt;/STRONG&gt;" option as of 3.5.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://doc.esri.com/en/arcgis-pro/latest/help/sharing/overview/pdf-export.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://doc.esri.com/en/arcgis-pro/latest/help/sharing/overview/pdf-export.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If the pictured artifact is reproducible in current versions of ArcGIS Pro (e.g. 3.7) please submit it as a bug with repro steps to Esri Support so that it can be properly assigned to a developer&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 18:58:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/fix-up-pdf-generation-in-pro/idc-p/1702911#M38378</guid>
      <dc:creator>JeremyWright</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-19T18:58:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

