<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Ability to add prefix to annotation feature class and choose custom name in ArcGIS Pro Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/ability-to-add-prefix-to-annotation-feature-class/idi-p/1429005</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;When converting labels to annotations in Pro you cannot change the name of the annotation feature class (AFC) nor can you add a prefix to the default name.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Please add the ability to create a custom feature class name as well as the ability to set a prefix to the default name.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="RTPL_AU_0-1715324135681.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/103710iDF7F61169E93DBFF/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="RTPL_AU_0-1715324135681.png" alt="RTPL_AU_0-1715324135681.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We prefix all our AFCs with 'anno_'&amp;nbsp; so that they are grouped together in the GDB.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;If there are many AFCs created from the same layer name (same layer added multiple times) then you have to use a custom suffix for each one and then go back to the GDB and rename them to something sensible.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A workflow now has to be discarded because Pro cannot do what ArcMap does.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Further to this - remove the requirement to add a new contents group layer for every annotation layer that is created. Is there a good reason that Pro cannot use an AFC that is not in a group layer in Contents?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2024 14:11:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RTPL_AU</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-05-10T14:11:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Ability to add prefix to annotation feature class and choose custom name</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/ability-to-add-prefix-to-annotation-feature-class/idi-p/1429005</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;When converting labels to annotations in Pro you cannot change the name of the annotation feature class (AFC) nor can you add a prefix to the default name.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Please add the ability to create a custom feature class name as well as the ability to set a prefix to the default name.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="RTPL_AU_0-1715324135681.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/103710iDF7F61169E93DBFF/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="RTPL_AU_0-1715324135681.png" alt="RTPL_AU_0-1715324135681.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We prefix all our AFCs with 'anno_'&amp;nbsp; so that they are grouped together in the GDB.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;If there are many AFCs created from the same layer name (same layer added multiple times) then you have to use a custom suffix for each one and then go back to the GDB and rename them to something sensible.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A workflow now has to be discarded because Pro cannot do what ArcMap does.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Further to this - remove the requirement to add a new contents group layer for every annotation layer that is created. Is there a good reason that Pro cannot use an AFC that is not in a group layer in Contents?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2024 14:11:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/ability-to-add-prefix-to-annotation-feature-class/idi-p/1429005</guid>
      <dc:creator>RTPL_AU</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-10T14:11:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ability to add prefix to annotation feature class and choose custom name</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/ability-to-add-prefix-to-annotation-feature-class/idc-p/1500131#M30891</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/129401"&gt;@KoryKramer&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; Please tell me what the rationale and process you had in mind was for the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Not allowing us to rename annotation layers in the "Convert Labels to Annotation"&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Placing resulting annotations in a group layer&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;These are steps I now have to go through every single time to get the required data names / map structure (rename in gdb and remove from group).&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;It is a non-trivial change from ArcMap so I assume there has to be some clear reason why; and if you can tell me it may help me do things better.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My process:&amp;nbsp; &lt;U&gt;Prefix&lt;/U&gt; all annotation with 'anno_' so that they are all together at the top of a gdb in catalog view. Then they may also be named to set the doc version, reason, style used, etc. We may have the same dataset labelled/anno'd multiple times for different documents or document versions.&lt;BR /&gt;I may place all final annotations in a group layer (e.g. to turn them off easily to see what labels remain) but usually they are each just a single map layer on their own.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2024 01:06:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/ability-to-add-prefix-to-annotation-feature-class/idc-p/1500131#M30891</guid>
      <dc:creator>RTPL_AU</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-02T01:06:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ability to add prefix to annotation feature class and choose custom name</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/ability-to-add-prefix-to-annotation-feature-class/idc-p/1528481#M31829</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Agree with this. This is effectively an ArcMap equivalency issue and as such should be addressed.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 07:42:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/ability-to-add-prefix-to-annotation-feature-class/idc-p/1528481#M31829</guid>
      <dc:creator>RichardHowe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-28T07:42:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ability to add prefix to annotation feature class and choose custom name</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/ability-to-add-prefix-to-annotation-feature-class/idc-p/1533265#M31953</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I've been looking for this! Agree with everything AND would be nice if we could append directly as well via the same dialog like we could in ArcMap. I don't want a million temp FCs just to turn it into one.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 13:03:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/ability-to-add-prefix-to-annotation-feature-class/idc-p/1533265#M31953</guid>
      <dc:creator>BrookeAumann</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-30T13:03:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Add option to add prefix or suffix to annotation layer name when converting labels</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/ability-to-add-prefix-to-annotation-feature-class/idc-p/1667748#M36759</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We use a process that has all annotation layer names start with an 'anno_' prefix.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This was easy to add/do in ArcMap but Pro only allows suffixes, so now we have to convert labels to an annotation feature class then rename them. Every Time.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please add the option to define a prefix or suffix, and while you're in there, add a checkbox to choose if Pro should create an output layer or not.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I never use the Output Layer as I may have other groups etc already set up so this adds yet another inefficiency for me.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 06:04:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/ability-to-add-prefix-to-annotation-feature-class/idc-p/1667748#M36759</guid>
      <dc:creator>RTPL_AU</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-11-21T06:04:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

