<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Bring back shape field visible fix when publishing services in ArcGIS Pro Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/bring-back-shape-field-visible-fix-when-publishing/idi-p/1404566</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Please bring the fix to the shape field not being visible when publishing a service that you had in ArcMap to Pro. Now we only have Select Layer in TOC and then have to open each table, then open field view to turn the shape field on, then save and close the field view. That is a lot of unnecessary steps for something that would have taken a second to fix in ArcMap.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Someone must have a python script to do it but this is a clear oversight when they were building Pro.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="MelanieWawryk_0-1712064610399.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/99742i4A93B23C922ED5D6/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="MelanieWawryk_0-1712064610399.png" alt="MelanieWawryk_0-1712064610399.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2024 13:38:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MelanieWawryk</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-04-02T13:38:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Bring back shape field visible fix when publishing services</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/bring-back-shape-field-visible-fix-when-publishing/idi-p/1404566</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Please bring the fix to the shape field not being visible when publishing a service that you had in ArcMap to Pro. Now we only have Select Layer in TOC and then have to open each table, then open field view to turn the shape field on, then save and close the field view. That is a lot of unnecessary steps for something that would have taken a second to fix in ArcMap.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Someone must have a python script to do it but this is a clear oversight when they were building Pro.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="MelanieWawryk_0-1712064610399.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/99742i4A93B23C922ED5D6/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="MelanieWawryk_0-1712064610399.png" alt="MelanieWawryk_0-1712064610399.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2024 13:38:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/bring-back-shape-field-visible-fix-when-publishing/idi-p/1404566</guid>
      <dc:creator>MelanieWawryk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-02T13:38:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bring back shape field visible fix when publishing services</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/bring-back-shape-field-visible-fix-when-publishing/idc-p/1563090#M33044</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/12688"&gt;@MelanieWawryk&lt;/a&gt;, I cannot upload an attachment here but this post may help you.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/toggle-shape-field-visibility/m-p/1563088#M90633" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/toggle-shape-field-visibility/m-p/1563088#M90633&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2024 18:07:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/bring-back-shape-field-visible-fix-when-publishing/idc-p/1563090#M33044</guid>
      <dc:creator>Brian_McLeer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-27T18:07:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bring back shape field visible fix when publishing services - Status changed to: Under Consideration</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/bring-back-shape-field-visible-fix-when-publishing/idc-p/1582492#M33686</link>
      <description />
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2025 22:58:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/bring-back-shape-field-visible-fix-when-publishing/idc-p/1582492#M33686</guid>
      <dc:creator>JonahLay</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-05T22:58:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bring back shape field visible fix when publishing services - Status changed to: In Product Plan</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/bring-back-shape-field-visible-fix-when-publishing/idc-p/1582822#M33698</link>
      <description />
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2025 19:51:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/bring-back-shape-field-visible-fix-when-publishing/idc-p/1582822#M33698</guid>
      <dc:creator>JonahLay</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-06T19:51:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bring back shape field visible fix when publishing services - Status changed to: Implemented</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/bring-back-shape-field-visible-fix-when-publishing/idc-p/1598761#M34244</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In Pro 3.5, there is an analyzer solution "Open Fields View" available when you right-click on the analyzer in the sharing pane.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 20:37:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/bring-back-shape-field-visible-fix-when-publishing/idc-p/1598761#M34244</guid>
      <dc:creator>SusanTran</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-24T20:37:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

