<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Zonal Statistics as Table Including Partial Pixels in ArcGIS Pro Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/zonal-statistics-as-table-including-partial-pixels/idi-p/1349613</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;BLUF: In Zonal Statistics as table (and regular ZS, too) Provide the option to include weight partial pixel weights.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Following the documentation on zonal statistics found on the &lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/tool-reference/spatial-analyst/how-zonal-statistics-works.htm" target="_self"&gt;Documentation page&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;there must be an overlap from both the zone&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;and&lt;/EM&gt; the center point of the raster from which the statistics are being drawn.&amp;nbsp; It would be super, if the statistics could include the portion of partial pixel coverage.&amp;nbsp; This would be particularly beneficial when calculating variables with comparatively large pixels, like Night time lights.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Basically, we have people turning to Google Earth Engine because they feel they are getting more accurate spatial statistics because they can use the weighted feature.&amp;nbsp; If ESRI could explore the &lt;A href="https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/guides/reducers_reduce_region" target="_self"&gt;GEE reducer documentation&lt;/A&gt; and add similar weighted and unweighted options in ArcPro.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2023 12:54:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>WalkerKB</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-11-15T12:54:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Zonal Statistics as Table Including Partial Pixels</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/zonal-statistics-as-table-including-partial-pixels/idi-p/1349613</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;BLUF: In Zonal Statistics as table (and regular ZS, too) Provide the option to include weight partial pixel weights.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Following the documentation on zonal statistics found on the &lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/tool-reference/spatial-analyst/how-zonal-statistics-works.htm" target="_self"&gt;Documentation page&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;there must be an overlap from both the zone&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;and&lt;/EM&gt; the center point of the raster from which the statistics are being drawn.&amp;nbsp; It would be super, if the statistics could include the portion of partial pixel coverage.&amp;nbsp; This would be particularly beneficial when calculating variables with comparatively large pixels, like Night time lights.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Basically, we have people turning to Google Earth Engine because they feel they are getting more accurate spatial statistics because they can use the weighted feature.&amp;nbsp; If ESRI could explore the &lt;A href="https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/guides/reducers_reduce_region" target="_self"&gt;GEE reducer documentation&lt;/A&gt; and add similar weighted and unweighted options in ArcPro.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2023 12:54:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/zonal-statistics-as-table-including-partial-pixels/idi-p/1349613</guid>
      <dc:creator>WalkerKB</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-15T12:54:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

