<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Grouping tiled lable in the database in ArcGIS Pro Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/grouping-tiled-lable-in-the-database/idi-p/1202884</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;When geoprocessing tiled annotation, the result can be automatically display on the content like grouped by scale :&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="group.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/48640iC0C07D4C7790332A/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="group.png" alt="group.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;A step further could be to do the same grouping in the database itself, maybe by generating Feature datasets for each scale and naming them with this scale, to make maintainability easier. &amp;nbsp;If something gets wrong or we lost this grouping is pain in a ask to select each layer to get them back on a map or deleting them if no more use of it.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2022 15:18:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MarcelSt-Germain</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-08-15T15:18:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Grouping tiled lable in the database</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/grouping-tiled-lable-in-the-database/idi-p/1202884</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;When geoprocessing tiled annotation, the result can be automatically display on the content like grouped by scale :&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="group.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/48640iC0C07D4C7790332A/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="group.png" alt="group.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;A step further could be to do the same grouping in the database itself, maybe by generating Feature datasets for each scale and naming them with this scale, to make maintainability easier. &amp;nbsp;If something gets wrong or we lost this grouping is pain in a ask to select each layer to get them back on a map or deleting them if no more use of it.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2022 15:18:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/grouping-tiled-lable-in-the-database/idi-p/1202884</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarcelSt-Germain</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-15T15:18:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Grouping tiled lable in the database - Status changed to: Closed</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/grouping-tiled-lable-in-the-database/idc-p/1203476#M20870</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have no plans to do this at this time. Feature datasets aren't folders, they have editing and dataset schema locking ramifications that we'd prefer not to push users into for just organization.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2022 20:01:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/grouping-tiled-lable-in-the-database/idc-p/1203476#M20870</guid>
      <dc:creator>CraigWilliams</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-16T20:01:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Grouping tiled lable in the database</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/grouping-tiled-lable-in-the-database/idc-p/1203722#M20885</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1178"&gt;@CraigWilliams&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That's unfortunate, it could save time when an annotation database contain thousand of entries for futur retrieving.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2022 14:11:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/grouping-tiled-lable-in-the-database/idc-p/1203722#M20885</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarcelSt-Germain</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-17T14:11:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

