<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea ArcGIS Pro could maintain layer field order and alias when sharing web layer with time zone specified in ArcGIS Pro Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-could-maintain-layer-field-order-and/idi-p/927573</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;ArcGIS Pro 2.4.3 changes the field order when I "Share as Web Layer" and "Overwrite Web Layer" to an ArcGIS Enterprise 10.7.1 hosted feature layer.&amp;nbsp; Mostly, the end result are date fields ordered at the tail end of the field list with the field aliases stripped off.&amp;nbsp; This is truly annoying and causes duplicate work to monkey around with the pop-up field order and aliases.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As a general expectation, I want the entire ArcGIS web service publishing results to respect all of the configurations I make in the:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;source geodatabase field definitions, order, metadata, etc.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;ArcGIS Pro map and layers&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;publishing configuration - e.g. if I set the time zone and daylight savings time, don't make me reset it every time I overwrite the service.&amp;nbsp; I believe I've had an idea about this kind of thing before.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Where's the link to that satisfaction survey?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;tim&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2020 16:42:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TimMinter</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-04-15T16:42:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ArcGIS Pro could maintain layer field order and alias when sharing web layer with time zone specified</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-could-maintain-layer-field-order-and/idi-p/927573</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;ArcGIS Pro 2.4.3 changes the field order when I "Share as Web Layer" and "Overwrite Web Layer" to an ArcGIS Enterprise 10.7.1 hosted feature layer.&amp;nbsp; Mostly, the end result are date fields ordered at the tail end of the field list with the field aliases stripped off.&amp;nbsp; This is truly annoying and causes duplicate work to monkey around with the pop-up field order and aliases.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As a general expectation, I want the entire ArcGIS web service publishing results to respect all of the configurations I make in the:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;source geodatabase field definitions, order, metadata, etc.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;ArcGIS Pro map and layers&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;publishing configuration - e.g. if I set the time zone and daylight savings time, don't make me reset it every time I overwrite the service.&amp;nbsp; I believe I've had an idea about this kind of thing before.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Where's the link to that satisfaction survey?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;tim&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2020 16:42:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-could-maintain-layer-field-order-and/idi-p/927573</guid>
      <dc:creator>TimMinter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-15T16:42:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcGIS Pro could maintain layer field order and alias when sharing web layer with time zone specified</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-could-maintain-layer-field-order-and/idc-p/927574#M1894</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Like&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/ideas/3580-respect-mxd-fields-order-in-mapservice-and-featureservice-rest-description"&gt;Respect MXD field's order in MapService and FeatureService REST description&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;which appears to have been implemented in ArcGIS 10.8.&amp;nbsp; I checked with ArcMap 10.8 (to an ArcGIS Online hosted feature service).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The data source field order was changed in the layer so that Date_Field3 is before Field2 which is before Field1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="image-1 jive-image" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/488984_pastedImage_2.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is what I see in ArcGIS Online:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="image-2 jive-image" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/488985_pastedImage_3.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The shape_area, shape_length and objectID fields are still ordered last:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="image-3 jive-image" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/488986_pastedImage_4.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In ArcGIS Pro 2.5, I see the layer order respected in the hosted feature service:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="jive-image image-4" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/488987_pastedImage_5.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I checked with aliases too and those come through as expected:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="image-5 jive-image" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/488988_pastedImage_6.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2020 20:19:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-could-maintain-layer-field-order-and/idc-p/927574#M1894</guid>
      <dc:creator>KoryKramer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-16T20:19:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcGIS Pro could maintain layer field order and alias when sharing web layer with time zone specified</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-could-maintain-layer-field-order-and/idc-p/927575#M1895</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Kory,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How do we reset this idea to "not offered"?&amp;nbsp; &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Clue in bold italics...&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;ArcGIS Pro 2.4.3 changes the field order when I "Share as Web Layer" and "Overwrite Web Layer" to an ArcGIS Enterprise 10.7.1 hosted feature layer.&amp;nbsp; &lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Mostly, the end result are date fields ordered at the tail end of the field list with the field aliases stripped off.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&amp;nbsp; This is truly annoying and causes duplicate work to monkey around with the pop-up field order and aliases.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I upgraded to ArcGIS Pro 2.5, immediately smacked my head on this (&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://support.esri.com/en/bugs/nimbus/QlVHLTAwMDEyOTAzMQ==" title="https://support.esri.com/en/bugs/nimbus/QlVHLTAwMDEyOTAzMQ=="&gt;BUG-000129031: In ArcGIS Pro 2.5, publishing a hosted feature layer..&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;), used "language" out loud, and observed that ArcGIS Pro 2.5 continues to change field order for me when I don't want it to, and refuses to change field order for me when I do want it to (&lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/ideas/1362"&gt;ArcGIS should allow the ability to permanently reorder fields in a table&lt;/A&gt;).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How to reproduce:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;make a file geodatabase feature class&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;add a date column somewhere in the front of the column list&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;share as web layer &amp;gt; Feature Layer &amp;gt; copy source data to AGE&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;specify the time zone and daylight savings time&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;publish to ArcGIS Enterprise 10.7.1.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Ta-dah, ArcGIS Pro mangles the field order, alias, and column name.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I notice that the Convert Time Zone GP tool offers the same results, so that's probably a clue for whoever didn't get the design principle message that ArcGIS does not change field order.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;tim&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2020 20:22:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-could-maintain-layer-field-order-and/idc-p/927575#M1895</guid>
      <dc:creator>TimMinter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-22T20:22:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcGIS Pro could maintain layer field order and alias when sharing web layer with time zone specified</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-could-maintain-layer-field-order-and/idc-p/927576#M1896</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Tim,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In my comment above I noted that the fix is in ArcGIS 10.8.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your steps indicate you are publishing to ArcGIS Enterprise 10.7.1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Below I published from ArcGIS Pro 2.5 to ArcGIS Enterprise 10.8.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is that what you expect to see?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="image-1 jive-image" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/489568_pastedImage_1.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2020 21:07:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-could-maintain-layer-field-order-and/idc-p/927576#M1896</guid>
      <dc:creator>KoryKramer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-22T21:07:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcGIS Pro could maintain layer field order and alias when sharing web layer with time zone specified</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-could-maintain-layer-field-order-and/idc-p/927577#M1897</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Kory,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Well, bummer.&amp;nbsp; Nope, my idea remains quite valid in my opinion.&amp;nbsp; I found an ArcGIS Enterprise 8 environment that I could test with.&amp;nbsp; Getting into a little computer science here...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;hypothesis:&amp;nbsp; Kory is right and Tim is wrong&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;test:&amp;nbsp; using WA-DNR's county boundaries (&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://geo.wa.gov/datasets/wadnr::wa-county-boundaries" title="https://geo.wa.gov/datasets/wadnr::wa-county-boundaries"&gt;WA County Boundaries&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;) as the source feature class, import it to an ArcGIS Pro 2.5&amp;nbsp; file geodatabase, then share as web layer to an ArcGIS Enterprise 8 deployment.&amp;nbsp; Check the position and name of the date column before and after.&amp;nbsp; If the position and name of the date column has changed, then the hypothesis is disproven.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;results:&amp;nbsp; hypothesis is disproven&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="image-1 jive-image" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/489729_pastedImage_3.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="image-2 jive-image" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/489730_pastedImage_4.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="image-3 jive-image" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/489731_pastedImage_5.png" /&gt;&lt;IMG class="jive-image image-4" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/489732_pastedImage_6.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="image-5 jive-image" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/489733_pastedImage_7.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="image-6 jive-image" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/489737_pastedImage_8.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="image-7 jive-image" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/489738_pastedImage_9.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="jive-image image-8" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/489739_pastedImage_10.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2020 16:27:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-could-maintain-layer-field-order-and/idc-p/927577#M1897</guid>
      <dc:creator>TimMinter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-23T16:27:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcGIS Pro could maintain layer field order and alias when sharing web layer with time zone specified</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-could-maintain-layer-field-order-and/idc-p/927578#M1898</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is the edit_date an editor tracking field?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2020 16:31:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-could-maintain-layer-field-order-and/idc-p/927578#M1898</guid>
      <dc:creator>KoryKramer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-23T16:31:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcGIS Pro could maintain layer field order and alias when sharing web layer with time zone specified</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-could-maintain-layer-field-order-and/idc-p/927579#M1899</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not in context of the ArcGIS Pro "Enable Editor Tracking" or ArcGIS Enterprise "Keep track of who created and last edited features" capabilities.&amp;nbsp; The field could have been named "TimTestDate" and my hypothesis is that it would have been shoved to the back of the list and renamed "timtestdate".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The same thing happens when using the Convert Time Zone GP tool, so I hypothesize that the "share as web layer" function calls the GP tool, uses its code, or is similar in some other way.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2020 17:09:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-could-maintain-layer-field-order-and/idc-p/927579#M1899</guid>
      <dc:creator>TimMinter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-23T17:09:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcGIS Pro could maintain layer field order and alias when sharing web layer with time zone specified</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-could-maintain-layer-field-order-and/idc-p/927580#M1900</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Interesting!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So I DO see what you see when I follow the steps that you provided.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is the difference in the testing that we were doing independently: since the idea was about changing field order, I had been &lt;STRONG&gt;changing the field order of the layer in Pro before sharing&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&amp;nbsp; And even when the Time Zone was set in my tests, &lt;STRONG&gt;I never saw it result in sending the date field to the end of the table&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since I was finally able to reproduce what you see, given that I knew what I had tested previously, I decided to change the field order of the layer in Pro before sharing.&amp;nbsp; When I do that, even with the Time Zone set (in this specific instance, I didn't check the Daylight savings box), the field order of the layer and the alias are maintained.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="image-1 jive-image" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/489821_pastedImage_1.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then, even if I just use the Reset Field Order command to revert the layer's field order back to the database order:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="image-3 jive-image" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/489823_pastedImage_3.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;publishing the layer still maintains the expected field order and does not alter the alias.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="image-2 jive-image" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/489822_pastedImage_2.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To demonstrate the repro steps you've outlined, if I remove the layer, and add the feature class back to the map and &lt;STRONG&gt;do nothing to the layer order,&lt;/STRONG&gt; publishing results in the date field being moved to the end of the table with a different alias.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="jive-image image-4" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/489824_pastedImage_4.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Given that, if you want to keep this as an idea open to voting by the community, a more descriptive title might be, "Maintain layer field order when sharing web layer with time zone specified"&amp;nbsp; Seems like a very niche case for an idea, though.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you agree, I could update the title and change the status back to (thoroughly) Reviewed.&amp;nbsp; Or if you'd prefer to update the title, you can do that and then ping me to reset the status.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2020 22:21:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-could-maintain-layer-field-order-and/idc-p/927580#M1900</guid>
      <dc:creator>KoryKramer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-23T22:21:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcGIS Pro could maintain layer field order and alias when sharing web layer with time zone specified</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-could-maintain-layer-field-order-and/idc-p/927581#M1901</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/migrated-users/45316"&gt;Kory Kramer&lt;/A&gt;‌&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I agree.&amp;nbsp; Please change the title to "ArcGIS Pro could m&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;aintain layer field order and alias when sharing web layer with time zone specified" if it has any chance of fitting and reset the status.&amp;nbsp; I don't think it's a niche idea.&amp;nbsp; I also think it fits squarely within the "Esri could provide an integrated, consistent, and reasonably good quality ArcGIS Platform" idea.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;Thanks,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;tim&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2020 22:58:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-could-maintain-layer-field-order-and/idc-p/927581#M1901</guid>
      <dc:creator>TimMinter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-28T22:58:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcGIS Pro could maintain layer field order and alias when sharing web layer with time zone specified</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-could-maintain-layer-field-order-and/idc-p/1006412#M14463</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Korey and Tim,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I ran into this issue today and will follow your steps to reorder Fields in Pro and republish.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What I am doing is joining a table to a feature class to create a target schema with empty join fields then publishing to Pro 10.8.1.&amp;nbsp; I am using the fields aliases from the hosted layer to match to the field aliases after converting Excel to Table and updating the hosted layer with the records from the table.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I understand correctly, simply reordering the fields in Pro will do some magic and they will publish correctly?&amp;nbsp; Is this a documented bug that can be fixed in Pro?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2020 22:13:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-could-maintain-layer-field-order-and/idc-p/1006412#M14463</guid>
      <dc:creator>RichardHughes2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-02T22:13:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

