<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Fixed Width Font for Attribute Table in ArcGIS Pro Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/fixed-width-font-for-attribute-table/idi-p/1021534</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I would love the option to make certain fields in the &lt;STRONG&gt;Attribute Table&lt;/STRONG&gt; display in a fixed-width font. To give one example, we have a table with document "numbers" in it, which are assigned by the County Recorder's Office:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="jCarlson_0-1611933634505.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/4894iFB86E3345BB2B2AB/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="jCarlson_0-1611933634505.png" alt="jCarlson_0-1611933634505.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In recent times, the County has moved to a standard 12-character string. These usually consist of numbers, but not always. Older documents often follow very different formats, as in the "73-1308" item pictured above. In &lt;EM&gt;very&lt;/EM&gt; old documents, the format may be "Book 23 Pages 68-70".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Because of the variability in the field's contents, I can't simply enforce a 12-character value with attribute rules or regular expressions. Grabbing values that do not follow the standard 12-character format for manual review returns a lot of false flags. Because of this, I'll often review the documents "Name" column manually to check for typos.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's not a huge use of time, so I don't care that I have to do it manually. What I care about is that the presence of letters in some of the names makes them appear to be of unequal length, when in fact they are not.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here's a sample in Excel. Look how much nicer it is with fixed-width!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="jCarlson_1-1611934363384.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/4895i3405699A7098928A/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="jCarlson_1-1611934363384.png" alt="jCarlson_1-1611934363384.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We've got some other departments that work with various permits, inspections, etc., and have run into a similar issue. It's minor, as issues go, but as I can't force other county departments to enforce data standards on what they give us, I'd at least like other ways to view the table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In Pro, we currently have the &lt;STRONG&gt;Numeric Format&lt;/STRONG&gt; option in the &lt;STRONG&gt;Fields&lt;/STRONG&gt; view, which I absolutely love. Perhaps that could turn into something like &lt;STRONG&gt;Field Format&lt;/STRONG&gt;? Based on the datatype, the dialog that displays could prompt for other things? (At the risk of violating the one-idea rule, I'd love to see more formatting options for datetime fields, too...)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 16:02:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jcarlson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-01-29T16:02:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Fixed Width Font for Attribute Table</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/fixed-width-font-for-attribute-table/idi-p/1021534</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I would love the option to make certain fields in the &lt;STRONG&gt;Attribute Table&lt;/STRONG&gt; display in a fixed-width font. To give one example, we have a table with document "numbers" in it, which are assigned by the County Recorder's Office:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="jCarlson_0-1611933634505.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/4894iFB86E3345BB2B2AB/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="jCarlson_0-1611933634505.png" alt="jCarlson_0-1611933634505.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In recent times, the County has moved to a standard 12-character string. These usually consist of numbers, but not always. Older documents often follow very different formats, as in the "73-1308" item pictured above. In &lt;EM&gt;very&lt;/EM&gt; old documents, the format may be "Book 23 Pages 68-70".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Because of the variability in the field's contents, I can't simply enforce a 12-character value with attribute rules or regular expressions. Grabbing values that do not follow the standard 12-character format for manual review returns a lot of false flags. Because of this, I'll often review the documents "Name" column manually to check for typos.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's not a huge use of time, so I don't care that I have to do it manually. What I care about is that the presence of letters in some of the names makes them appear to be of unequal length, when in fact they are not.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here's a sample in Excel. Look how much nicer it is with fixed-width!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="jCarlson_1-1611934363384.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/4895i3405699A7098928A/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="jCarlson_1-1611934363384.png" alt="jCarlson_1-1611934363384.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We've got some other departments that work with various permits, inspections, etc., and have run into a similar issue. It's minor, as issues go, but as I can't force other county departments to enforce data standards on what they give us, I'd at least like other ways to view the table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In Pro, we currently have the &lt;STRONG&gt;Numeric Format&lt;/STRONG&gt; option in the &lt;STRONG&gt;Fields&lt;/STRONG&gt; view, which I absolutely love. Perhaps that could turn into something like &lt;STRONG&gt;Field Format&lt;/STRONG&gt;? Based on the datatype, the dialog that displays could prompt for other things? (At the risk of violating the one-idea rule, I'd love to see more formatting options for datetime fields, too...)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 16:02:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/fixed-width-font-for-attribute-table/idi-p/1021534</guid>
      <dc:creator>jcarlson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-29T16:02:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

