<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Add better error message for importing feature class into feature dataset with same name in Geodatabase in ArcGIS Pro Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/add-better-error-message-for-importing-feature/idi-p/975250</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;Currently if you attempt to import a new feature class into a feature dataset within a geodatabase that has the same name as the feature class you are importing anywhere in that entire geodatabase you get a very generic error message (Error 000210 - Failed to Convert). &amp;nbsp;It you attempt to use the Feature Class to Feature Class to bring it in, you get a different error (Error 000594 - falls outside of geomtry). &amp;nbsp;Both of these point you in the wrong direction in attempting to find the true problem. &amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So the request here is to add a better and more meaningful error message, something like "target already exists". &amp;nbsp;From what I&amp;nbsp;have heard from others this is a common problem and many have spent many hours troubleshooting when a simply a better error message could have prevented this. &amp;nbsp;

&lt;!-- content transformation source ID: 08730000000brxl --&gt;

&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 17:18:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>EricDaniel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-10-07T17:18:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Add better error message for importing feature class into feature dataset with same name in Geodatabase</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/add-better-error-message-for-importing-feature/idi-p/975250</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;Currently if you attempt to import a new feature class into a feature dataset within a geodatabase that has the same name as the feature class you are importing anywhere in that entire geodatabase you get a very generic error message (Error 000210 - Failed to Convert). &amp;nbsp;It you attempt to use the Feature Class to Feature Class to bring it in, you get a different error (Error 000594 - falls outside of geomtry). &amp;nbsp;Both of these point you in the wrong direction in attempting to find the true problem. &amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So the request here is to add a better and more meaningful error message, something like "target already exists". &amp;nbsp;From what I&amp;nbsp;have heard from others this is a common problem and many have spent many hours troubleshooting when a simply a better error message could have prevented this. &amp;nbsp;

&lt;!-- content transformation source ID: 08730000000brxl --&gt;

&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 17:18:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/add-better-error-message-for-importing-feature/idi-p/975250</guid>
      <dc:creator>EricDaniel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-07T17:18:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Add better error message for importing feature class into feature dataset with same name in Geodatabase</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/add-better-error-message-for-importing-feature/idc-p/975251#M10417</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;In general ESRI provides very meaningless error messages. This is another prime example. It requires SWAG to figure the answer. (Scientific Wild Ass Guess)

&lt;!-- content transformation source ID: 00aE00000029Lc9 --&gt;

&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 19:42:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/add-better-error-message-for-importing-feature/idc-p/975251#M10417</guid>
      <dc:creator>ScottStevens1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-22T19:42:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Add better error message for importing feature class into feature dataset with same name in Geodatabase</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/add-better-error-message-for-importing-feature/idc-p/975252#M10418</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;In addition to giving more meaningful error messages, particulary in this case when the solution is very basic, can we change this behavior for feature classes in feature datasets? &amp;nbsp;Is there a reason that feature classes in separate feature datasets are not allowed to have the same name?

&lt;!-- content transformation source ID: 00aE00000030OFx --&gt;

&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2013 19:21:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/add-better-error-message-for-importing-feature/idc-p/975252#M10418</guid>
      <dc:creator>ClaireBrill</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-17T19:21:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Add better error message for importing feature class into feature dataset with same name in Geodatabase</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/add-better-error-message-for-importing-feature/idc-p/975253#M10419</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;I agree about esri's penchant for useless error messages and also say THANK YOU for explaining what I finally came to figure out on my own!&amp;nbsp;

&lt;!-- content transformation source ID: 00aE00000031Ks1 --&gt;

&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2013 21:35:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/add-better-error-message-for-importing-feature/idc-p/975253#M10419</guid>
      <dc:creator>AnnAler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-20T21:35:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Add better error message for importing feature class into feature dataset with same name in Geodatabase</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/add-better-error-message-for-importing-feature/idc-p/975254#M10420</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;I completely agre with this - the error messages are completely unhelpful for such a simple problem. &amp;nbsp;I am surprised this item has not been voted higher.

&lt;!-- content transformation source ID: 00aE0000009EVFg --&gt;

&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2014 12:47:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/add-better-error-message-for-importing-feature/idc-p/975254#M10420</guid>
      <dc:creator>BernieConnors</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-09T12:47:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Add better error message for importing feature class into feature dataset with same name in Geodatabase</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/add-better-error-message-for-importing-feature/idc-p/975255#M10421</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;Completely agree, I was just trying to do the same thing (import to a feature class) and got the same error message (Error 000594) for a completely different reason (my dataset was locates in a full personal geodatabase). I only fiugred out the solution because I have had this error before, but it took me all morning to figure it out! Please fix!

&lt;!-- content transformation source ID: 00aE0000009rLg6 --&gt;

&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2015 15:15:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/add-better-error-message-for-importing-feature/idc-p/975255#M10421</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jocelynvan_den_Akker</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-26T15:15:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Add better error message for importing feature class into feature dataset with same name in Geodatabase</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/add-better-error-message-for-importing-feature/idc-p/975256#M10422</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;Totally agree. Better error messages.&amp;nbsp; That this problem persists 4 years after the initial post proves it.&amp;nbsp; Error 000210: cannot create output still is vague and misleading.&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;

&lt;!-- content transformation source ID: 00aE000000BZdle --&gt;

&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2015 18:33:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/add-better-error-message-for-importing-feature/idc-p/975256#M10422</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ann123</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-07T18:33:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Add better error message for importing feature class into feature dataset with same name in Geodatabase</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/add-better-error-message-for-importing-feature/idc-p/975257#M10423</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is a typical problem using ESRI software.&amp;nbsp; It requires hours of my time and often unnecessary time spent by ESRI support staff.&amp;nbsp; In my experience, with proper error trapping, a meaningful error can be provided in almost all cases.&amp;nbsp; I suggest allocating more resources to returning useful error messages.&amp;nbsp; This would probably result in overall savings for ESRI.&amp;nbsp; It certainly would if you include lost time by developers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2018 20:55:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/add-better-error-message-for-importing-feature/idc-p/975257#M10423</guid>
      <dc:creator>CraigPennington</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-11T20:55:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Add better error message for importing feature class into feature dataset with same name in Geodatabase - Status changed to: Closed</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/add-better-error-message-for-importing-feature/idc-p/1526226#M31713</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Afternoon all, thank you for your comments.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the current version of ArcGIS Pro (3.3.1) Importing a feature class to a feature dataset of the same name returns:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ERROR 002852: Output Feature Class: &amp;lt;class_name&amp;gt; exists within geodatabase as &amp;lt;path to feature dataset&amp;gt;. A&amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;object type&amp;gt; name can only exist once within a geodatabase, including within all feature datasets.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 23:53:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/add-better-error-message-for-importing-feature/idc-p/1526226#M31713</guid>
      <dc:creator>SSWoodward</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-22T23:53:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

