<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Traverse Tool to Use Azimuth Types in ArcGIS Parcel Fabric Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idi-p/1056338</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi There,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P data-unlink="true"&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Currently different Azimuth types (Grid, Rhumb Line, Forward/Mean/Reverse Geodetic) for COGO lines are supported when using the &lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/help/editing/create-polyline-features.htm#ESRI_SECTION1_22AE3F65C5E347DA9CE2D629B78541F1" target="_self"&gt;Two-Point&lt;/A&gt; line tool. From the testing I have completed so far, these direction types seem to be working quite well and make a huge difference when entering lines from survey plats that show mean geodetic bearings. I think it would be great if these Azimuth types could be supported when using the&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/help/editing/enter-a-traverse.htm" target="_self"&gt;Traverse tool&lt;/A&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P data-unlink="true"&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P data-unlink="true"&gt;Mike Z&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P data-unlink="true"&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1207"&gt;@TimHodson&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P data-unlink="true"&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/3062"&gt;@AmirBar-Maor&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2021 18:22:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MikeZummo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-05-10T18:22:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Traverse Tool to Use Azimuth Types</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idi-p/1056338</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi There,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P data-unlink="true"&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Currently different Azimuth types (Grid, Rhumb Line, Forward/Mean/Reverse Geodetic) for COGO lines are supported when using the &lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/help/editing/create-polyline-features.htm#ESRI_SECTION1_22AE3F65C5E347DA9CE2D629B78541F1" target="_self"&gt;Two-Point&lt;/A&gt; line tool. From the testing I have completed so far, these direction types seem to be working quite well and make a huge difference when entering lines from survey plats that show mean geodetic bearings. I think it would be great if these Azimuth types could be supported when using the&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/help/editing/enter-a-traverse.htm" target="_self"&gt;Traverse tool&lt;/A&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P data-unlink="true"&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P data-unlink="true"&gt;Mike Z&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P data-unlink="true"&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1207"&gt;@TimHodson&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P data-unlink="true"&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/3062"&gt;@AmirBar-Maor&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2021 18:22:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idi-p/1056338</guid>
      <dc:creator>MikeZummo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-10T18:22:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Traverse Tool to Use Azimuth Types</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idc-p/1057720#M204</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I agree, adding this functionality to the Traverse Tool would drastically decrease data entry times and minimize errors with hand entering numerous line courses.&amp;nbsp; Thanks&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/311041"&gt;@MikeZummo&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2021 17:40:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idc-p/1057720#M204</guid>
      <dc:creator>joshuaforeman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-13T17:40:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Traverse Tool to Use Azimuth Types</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idc-p/1058411#M210</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/425092"&gt;@joshuaforeman&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So far the only organization we know of that uses true mean bearing is BLM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We would like to know if anyone else is using it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you also work for/with BLM?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Amir&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2021 07:26:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idc-p/1058411#M210</guid>
      <dc:creator>AmirBar-Maor</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-17T07:26:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Traverse Tool to Use Azimuth Types</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idc-p/1059495#M214</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I strongly endorse this idea as well.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2021 16:35:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idc-p/1059495#M214</guid>
      <dc:creator>LucasBeauchamp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-19T16:35:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Traverse Tool to Use Azimuth Types</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idc-p/1059518#M215</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I 100% need this tool.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2021 16:54:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idc-p/1059518#M215</guid>
      <dc:creator>JeffSwann</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-19T16:54:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Traverse Tool to Use Azimuth Types</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idc-p/1059689#M216</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The tool would be of great use to many in the GCDB/cadNSDI world! Thank you &lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/311041"&gt;@MikeZummo&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2021 20:58:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idc-p/1059689#M216</guid>
      <dc:creator>MonteKing</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-19T20:58:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Traverse Tool to Use Azimuth Types</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idc-p/1059806#M217</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Would anyone use it outside of CadNSDI (PLSS - US Public Land Survey System)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/311041"&gt;@MikeZummo&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When you are entering a 'true mean bearing' direction, do you also have the turning points? meaning - do you have the point and coordinates at the line extremities that you would need to snap to?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/12933"&gt;@nancyvonmeyer&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;what is your take on the use of true mean bearing on BLM plats?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are they really observed using theodolites in the 21 century? or inversed from GNSS?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2021 07:23:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idc-p/1059806#M217</guid>
      <dc:creator>AmirBar-Maor</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-20T07:23:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Traverse Tool to Use Azimuth Types</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idc-p/1059953#M218</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/3062"&gt;@AmirBar-Maor&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am not sure anyone outside of PLSS world would utilize the tool except the BLM does still execute surveys in M&amp;amp;B states reporting bearings as true so there is a slim chance folks in M&amp;amp;B states would use it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We typically use geodetic (GNSS inverse) but many surveys are not GNSS friendly so we still use conventional total stations utilizing astronomic/true bearings from celestial observations(Polaris or Sun). The geodetic vs astronomic/true is minimal difference for the most part therefore they are typically interchanged.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For an interesting read if not already done so see Jerry Wahl's paper on PLSS datum at the below link&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.cadastral.com/cad-datm.htm" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cadastral.com/cad-datm.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2021 14:40:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idc-p/1059953#M218</guid>
      <dc:creator>MonteKing</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-20T14:40:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Traverse Tool to Use Azimuth Types</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idc-p/1060302#M219</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/485847"&gt;@MonteKing&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the input.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So far we know that anyone that maintains PLSS would be using it (BLM, state custodians, BIA, USFS) but we were trying to understand if there is anyone else.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Local governments in the US usually survey the physical section corners using high accuracy GNSS and have never expressed interest in other direction types.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, all customers need to be able to enter historic information that uses the old survey technics before the total station era.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for sharing Jerry's Wahl paper. IMHO it would be great if every PLSS monument was surveyed using survey-grade GNSS and its coordinates, epoch, and accuracy published for the next generations. Some PLSS custodians are more progressive and some are more traditional. Some accept surveys from other agencies and some only trust their own surveyors.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maybe such a discussion is better suited for this group:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/t5/plss-editing/gh-p/plss-editing" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.esri.com/t5/plss-editing/gh-p/plss-editing&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2021 07:39:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idc-p/1060302#M219</guid>
      <dc:creator>AmirBar-Maor</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-21T07:39:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Traverse Tool to Use Azimuth Types</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idc-p/1060990#M220</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I support Mike Zummo, the traverse tool needs to include azimuth types.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2021 15:26:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idc-p/1060990#M220</guid>
      <dc:creator>Cal_Norton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-24T15:26:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Traverse Tool to Use Azimuth Types - Status changed to: In Product Plan</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idc-p/1346605#M660</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Will be implemented with ArcGIS pro 3.3&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2023 11:05:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idc-p/1346605#M660</guid>
      <dc:creator>AmirBar-Maor</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-07T11:05:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Traverse Tool to Use Azimuth Types - Status changed to: In Product Plan</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idc-p/1346718#M680</link>
      <description>Thank you!&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you!&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you!&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you!&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you!&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you!&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you!&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you!&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2023 15:47:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idc-p/1346718#M680</guid>
      <dc:creator>MikeZummo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-07T15:47:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Traverse Tool to Use Azimuth Types</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idc-p/1346753#M682</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Fantastic news. Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2023 16:47:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idc-p/1346753#M682</guid>
      <dc:creator>LucasBeauchamp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-07T16:47:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Traverse Tool to Use Azimuth Types - Status changed to: In Product Plan</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idc-p/1346762#M683</link>
      <description>Amir,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This will greatly benefit our work. Thank you so much for making this a reality!&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2023 17:00:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idc-p/1346762#M683</guid>
      <dc:creator>joshuaforeman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-07T17:00:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Traverse Tool to Use Azimuth Types</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idc-p/1347086#M689</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Kudos to the entire parcel fabric team&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2023 12:23:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idc-p/1347086#M689</guid>
      <dc:creator>AmirBar-Maor</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-08T12:23:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Traverse Tool to Use Azimuth Types</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idc-p/1365107#M781</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/3062"&gt;@AmirBar-Maor&lt;/a&gt;this is fantastic news! I see the LS adjustment tool now supports azimuth type as well with 3.2. Though there may not be a ton of use for this outside of PLSS editing environment (though it appears there is from above), PLSS management is an important piece of managing the cadastral framework. Many of us associated/partnered with BLM appreciate this addition very much!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Happy holidays!!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2023 23:23:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idc-p/1365107#M781</guid>
      <dc:creator>Hedstrom_Jeff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-29T23:23:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Traverse Tool to Use Azimuth Types</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idc-p/1365279#M782</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks all for the enthusiastic reactions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IMHO, the support for the geodetic directions is needed for old survey documents. How old? before GNSS&amp;nbsp; in which theodolites were used to establish them. However, it puzzles me to see surveyors use geodetic GNSS receivers, perform highly accurate static measurements to extract coordinates, and then convert those measurements (inverse) to geodetic "measurement". IMHO it just adds unnecessary complexity and you lose important metadata about the original measurements. With the move to dynamic reference frames (datum) perhaps this should be looked into... such historic document could fit nicely&amp;nbsp;next to the theodolite in the display cabinet &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2024 09:26:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idc-p/1365279#M782</guid>
      <dc:creator>AmirBar-Maor</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-01-02T09:26:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Traverse Tool to Use Azimuth Types - Status changed to: Implemented</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idc-p/1394724#M825</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Implemented in ArcGIS Pro 3.3&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 16:00:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idc-p/1394724#M825</guid>
      <dc:creator>AmirBar-Maor</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-03-12T16:00:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Traverse Tool to Use Azimuth Types</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idc-p/1394753#M834</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Excellent. Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 16:36:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idc-p/1394753#M834</guid>
      <dc:creator>LucasBeauchamp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-03-12T16:36:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Traverse Tool to Use Azimuth Types</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idc-p/1394911#M837</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Amir,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Again, much appreciated!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We can't wait to use this tool to digitize 30+ pages of bearings and distances (20+ miles of shoreline) geodetically.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This 2019 Plat and Field notes are a great example.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/&lt;A href="https://sdms.ak.blm.gov/scanned_images_temp/TWP_U0080N0190E_03122024123434.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://sdms.ak.blm.gov/scanned_images_temp/TWP_U0080N0190E_03122024123434.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 20:41:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/traverse-tool-to-use-azimuth-types/idc-p/1394911#M837</guid>
      <dc:creator>joshuaforeman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-03-12T20:41:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

