<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: AGO Premium Feature Data Store in ArcGIS Online Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-questions/ago-premium-feature-data-store/m-p/1353926#M56100</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Any update on how this has worked out?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2023 02:44:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MarkChilcott</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-11-28T02:44:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>AGO Premium Feature Data Store</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-questions/ago-premium-feature-data-store/m-p/1092925#M41921</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We recently learned that Esri introduced rate-limiting for AGO in September 2020.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;As i understand it, rate-limiting is a new development in AGO.&amp;nbsp; It subsequently has impacted a few of our high traffic critical applications in undesirable ways including slow performance and 429 errors invoked when demand is high.&amp;nbsp; We have always operated on (what has become) the standard feature data store since 2014 without issue until summer 2021 with our wildfire application and data layers (2021 was/is a particularly active fire season for us).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We find ourselves in a situation where just a handful of our AGO applications and maybe a dozen associated hosted feature layers require the performance of the high cost M4 tier that allows for higher traffic and mitigates the 429 errors we were seeing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We're hopeful that as Esri tunes the rate-limiting and premium tiers that more flexible options become available.&amp;nbsp; Possible options:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;cost relative to actual usage instead of a flat monthly fee for Premium Tiers&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;enable AGO org to specify content that needs Premium Tier performance&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;and enable AGO org to specify date ranges for when Premium Tier usage is required&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;better documentation and transparency regarding rate-limiting and performance needs.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'd love to hear from other AGO Organizations who may have similar concerns - what works for you with the new rate-limiting and premium feature data stores and what doesn't?&amp;nbsp; Have you opted for a Premium Tier feature datastore?&amp;nbsp; Some info is available here (search page for Premium Feature Data Store as there is no direct link to the section):&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://doc.arcgis.com/en/arcgis-online/reference/faq.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://doc.arcgis.com/en/arcgis-online/reference/faq.htm&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2021 22:11:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-questions/ago-premium-feature-data-store/m-p/1092925#M41921</guid>
      <dc:creator>MegHoole</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-08-26T22:11:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AGO Premium Feature Data Store</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-questions/ago-premium-feature-data-store/m-p/1353926#M56100</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Any update on how this has worked out?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2023 02:44:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-questions/ago-premium-feature-data-store/m-p/1353926#M56100</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarkChilcott</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-28T02:44:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

