<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Licensing for Relationship Class Use-case Scenarios in ArcGIS Online Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-questions/licensing-for-relationship-class-use-case/m-p/1130596#M43618</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, but also hoping to find &lt;EM&gt;explicit confirmation&lt;/EM&gt; through help documentation I possibly overlooked or through someone who has experience navigating the limitations of different Desktop license levels where relationship classes are concerned. I would rather not add more standard level licenses than necessary to our account, especially if a solution is available through Online feature services, but I am&amp;nbsp;pessimistic about my prospects for Desktop software.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 21:47:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JesseClark</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-01-04T21:47:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Licensing for Relationship Class Use-case Scenarios</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-questions/licensing-for-relationship-class-use-case/m-p/1130479#M43606</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi GIS Community,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My organization relies on basic level desktop licenses for our work, but I am interested in upgrading one license to standard level to take advantage of relationship classes. I found documentation for&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;EM&gt;ArcMap&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;that suggests the rest of my GIS team using basic level desktop licenses will be unable to edit any feature classes participating in a relationship class. Is this true for ArcGIS Pro users as well? I am aware that relationship classes are supported by ArcGIS Online and mobile geodatabases. If I connected online feature services through a relationship class, would anyone on my GIS team&amp;nbsp;using basic level desktop licenses be able to edit those feature services in ArcGIS Pro? What about editing those feature services live or in a offline scenario via mobile geodatabase in the Field Collector app for iOS - what kind of desktop licensing or Online user types are required for this kind of workflow? Thanks for any guidance you can provide.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 18:48:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-questions/licensing-for-relationship-class-use-case/m-p/1130479#M43606</guid>
      <dc:creator>JesseClark</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-01-04T18:48:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Licensing for Relationship Class Use-case Scenarios</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-questions/licensing-for-relationship-class-use-case/m-p/1130576#M43613</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This may help:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/get-started/license-levels.htm" target="_blank"&gt;https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/get-started/license-levels.htm&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 21:01:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-questions/licensing-for-relationship-class-use-case/m-p/1130576#M43613</guid>
      <dc:creator>ABishop</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-01-04T21:01:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Licensing for Relationship Class Use-case Scenarios</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-questions/licensing-for-relationship-class-use-case/m-p/1130581#M43614</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Amanda. I reviewed that particular help page before posting, but I found the discussion and functionality tables too general to answer my specific questions.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 21:22:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-questions/licensing-for-relationship-class-use-case/m-p/1130581#M43614</guid>
      <dc:creator>JesseClark</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-01-04T21:22:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Licensing for Relationship Class Use-case Scenarios</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-questions/licensing-for-relationship-class-use-case/m-p/1130583#M43615</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I think the gist is that a basic license only provides you the access to view and analyze the data, not to edit it.... which is what I thought you were asking?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 21:26:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-questions/licensing-for-relationship-class-use-case/m-p/1130583#M43615</guid>
      <dc:creator>ABishop</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-01-04T21:26:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Licensing for Relationship Class Use-case Scenarios</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-questions/licensing-for-relationship-class-use-case/m-p/1130596#M43618</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, but also hoping to find &lt;EM&gt;explicit confirmation&lt;/EM&gt; through help documentation I possibly overlooked or through someone who has experience navigating the limitations of different Desktop license levels where relationship classes are concerned. I would rather not add more standard level licenses than necessary to our account, especially if a solution is available through Online feature services, but I am&amp;nbsp;pessimistic about my prospects for Desktop software.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 21:47:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-questions/licensing-for-relationship-class-use-case/m-p/1130596#M43618</guid>
      <dc:creator>JesseClark</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-01-04T21:47:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Licensing for Relationship Class Use-case Scenarios</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-questions/licensing-for-relationship-class-use-case/m-p/1130597#M43619</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;With Pro, the licensing on desktop is same as in ArcGIS Online.&amp;nbsp; I don't think the functionality differs.&amp;nbsp; Might be worth it to call your ESRI business representative or licensing manager to ask specifics.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 21:48:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-questions/licensing-for-relationship-class-use-case/m-p/1130597#M43619</guid>
      <dc:creator>ABishop</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-01-04T21:48:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

