<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Custom basemap performance (using many underlying layers) in ArcGIS Online Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-questions/custom-basemap-performance-using-many-underlying/m-p/1123936#M43254</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello -&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My organization is maintaining custom basemap items within an enterprise AGO group -&lt;A href="https://www.esri.com/arcgis-blog/products/arcgis-online/mapping/custom-basemap-gallery/" target="_self"&gt; following the "Move to Basemap" workflow described in this article&lt;/A&gt;. I have some questions about the performance of adding multiple layers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example, having we would have a single "Imagery" basemap option that comprises say 50 or&amp;nbsp; over 100 layers (as moved to the basemap). This allows us to abstract things like image services and public WMS for the user, integrating them into this one option.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are there any performance issues one might expect with having a large number of layers within a single AGO item? Is this a sustainable approach? Is there such thing as having too many? Or a limit that can be added to the underlying basemap?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2021 17:58:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>KeonMonroe</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-12-08T17:58:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Custom basemap performance (using many underlying layers)</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-questions/custom-basemap-performance-using-many-underlying/m-p/1123936#M43254</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello -&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My organization is maintaining custom basemap items within an enterprise AGO group -&lt;A href="https://www.esri.com/arcgis-blog/products/arcgis-online/mapping/custom-basemap-gallery/" target="_self"&gt; following the "Move to Basemap" workflow described in this article&lt;/A&gt;. I have some questions about the performance of adding multiple layers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example, having we would have a single "Imagery" basemap option that comprises say 50 or&amp;nbsp; over 100 layers (as moved to the basemap). This allows us to abstract things like image services and public WMS for the user, integrating them into this one option.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are there any performance issues one might expect with having a large number of layers within a single AGO item? Is this a sustainable approach? Is there such thing as having too many? Or a limit that can be added to the underlying basemap?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2021 17:58:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-questions/custom-basemap-performance-using-many-underlying/m-p/1123936#M43254</guid>
      <dc:creator>KeonMonroe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-08T17:58:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

