<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Is it possibile to increase quality / resolution of ArcGIS cached / dynamic Map Services? in ArcGIS Online Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-questions/is-it-possibile-to-increase-quality-resolution-of/m-p/633270#M31557</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maybe this question is too generic, but it is something that has been bugging me since I started working with web mapping. The output of ArcGIS Map Services, whether dynamic or cached, is consistently worse compared to what you see on the&amp;nbsp;'authoring'&amp;nbsp;side (ArcMap and especially ArcGIS Pro).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am already using all the best practices such as setting antialiasing to best/force and PNG32 as format, but the result is always blurrier&amp;nbsp;than expected, to the point that (small) labels that are perfectly visible on the map/project, when cached or displayed with a service are almost un-readable.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While I am sure that this has something to do with the rendering engine and its limitations, I also feel that&amp;nbsp;we might see some improvements if we could change the default DPI value which is 96, when quality is paramount over bandwidth/size. The&amp;nbsp;thing is that I cannot find a reliable workflow or even a setting anywhere to serve high resolution services when needed. I managed to create a 192 dpi tile package by setting scales manually, only to find out that when displayed/published&amp;nbsp;tiles from a given level are displayed at the wrong scale (e.g L05 at L06), which makes the extra-resolution completely useless.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone have an idea on how to tackle this problem or successfully managed to create high DPI cached / dynamic services (beside using vector tiles) or we are effectively stuck with&amp;nbsp;a "blurry standard"?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2017 10:18:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MarcoLucafo_</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-11-28T10:18:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is it possibile to increase quality / resolution of ArcGIS cached / dynamic Map Services?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-questions/is-it-possibile-to-increase-quality-resolution-of/m-p/633270#M31557</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maybe this question is too generic, but it is something that has been bugging me since I started working with web mapping. The output of ArcGIS Map Services, whether dynamic or cached, is consistently worse compared to what you see on the&amp;nbsp;'authoring'&amp;nbsp;side (ArcMap and especially ArcGIS Pro).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am already using all the best practices such as setting antialiasing to best/force and PNG32 as format, but the result is always blurrier&amp;nbsp;than expected, to the point that (small) labels that are perfectly visible on the map/project, when cached or displayed with a service are almost un-readable.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While I am sure that this has something to do with the rendering engine and its limitations, I also feel that&amp;nbsp;we might see some improvements if we could change the default DPI value which is 96, when quality is paramount over bandwidth/size. The&amp;nbsp;thing is that I cannot find a reliable workflow or even a setting anywhere to serve high resolution services when needed. I managed to create a 192 dpi tile package by setting scales manually, only to find out that when displayed/published&amp;nbsp;tiles from a given level are displayed at the wrong scale (e.g L05 at L06), which makes the extra-resolution completely useless.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone have an idea on how to tackle this problem or successfully managed to create high DPI cached / dynamic services (beside using vector tiles) or we are effectively stuck with&amp;nbsp;a "blurry standard"?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2017 10:18:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-questions/is-it-possibile-to-increase-quality-resolution-of/m-p/633270#M31557</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarcoLucafo_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-28T10:18:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

