topic Re: Publishing Geocoded Points to AGOL in ArcGIS Online Questions

Publishing Geocoded Points to AGOL

JoeBorgione — Thu, 13 Aug 2020 14:17:54 GMT

ArcGIS Pro 2.5.1

I've geocoded a number of tables into point feature classes; nothing new for me. However, when I publish the results to AGOL, I get one of several errors when I perform the Analyze step. Sometimes I have to make the locator name field visible, other times, it's the place name field, and some other times it's street name field. I don't remember what locators I used, but it just seems odd, if not silly to me that these fields need to be turned on in order to publish.

Re: Publishing Geocoded Points to AGOL

JonahLay — Thu, 13 Aug 2020 14:39:01 GMT

Hi Joe,

I'm assuming that you are sharing a web feature layer? What errors do you get when you click on Analyze?

Jonah

Re: Publishing Geocoded Points to AGOL

JoeBorgione — Thu, 13 Aug 2020 15:24:14 GMT

Yes, I'm publishing to a web feature layer. As mentioned, the errors vary based on the fields I've turned off in the geocoded results feature class class. Here's one:

00212: Display field must be visible—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation ; it's no big deal to make it visible, more of an irritation;.I try to keep my feature layers to a minimum with respect to fields as I never know who is going to be looking at the data.

Re: Publishing Geocoded Points to AGOL

JoeBorgione — Thu, 13 Aug 2020 15:31:11 GMT

Here is another with the geocoded points fields in the backgorund:

Re: Publishing Geocoded Points to AGOL

JonahLay — Thu, 13 Aug 2020 17:09:17 GMT

A field that is selected as the Display field must be visible. Analyzer 00212 appears if the field ("StName" in your case), previously set as the Display field, is not visible.

If you navigate to your Layer Properties -> Display, and set a different Display field, the analyzer should not appear.

Hope it helps,

Jonah

Re: Publishing Geocoded Points to AGOL

JoeBorgione — Thu, 13 Aug 2020 17:53:53 GMT

Ahhh... I see. Okay. That explains the randomness of it. Thanks for the explanation!