<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Show Table Performance in ArcGIS Online Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-questions/show-table-performance/m-p/496804#M25050</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi.&amp;nbsp; We are experimenting with filters to provide a query-like capability for our users.&amp;nbsp; Our data can be quite large (e.g. statewide routes) and I'm curious if the performance I'm seeing in the "Show Table" feature is expected.&amp;nbsp; In our testing, we are using a feature class of lines deployed through an internally hosted map service that consists of about 77000 features.&amp;nbsp; Our filters generally return between 30 and 80 features.&amp;nbsp; When we show the table for the filtered features, we are unable to select a feature through the table to zoom to it.&amp;nbsp; I mean, it looks selected, but the table always shows "x features, 0 selected."&amp;nbsp; I know the function works because smaller feature classes seem to perform pretty well.&amp;nbsp; But, it's like the show table function is trying to manage all 77000 features instead of the 30-80 we've selected.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can anyone shed any light on this?&amp;nbsp; And any tips/tricks are welcome.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Mary Ellen&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2014 13:22:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MaryEllen_Perko</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-08-27T13:22:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Show Table Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-questions/show-table-performance/m-p/496804#M25050</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi.&amp;nbsp; We are experimenting with filters to provide a query-like capability for our users.&amp;nbsp; Our data can be quite large (e.g. statewide routes) and I'm curious if the performance I'm seeing in the "Show Table" feature is expected.&amp;nbsp; In our testing, we are using a feature class of lines deployed through an internally hosted map service that consists of about 77000 features.&amp;nbsp; Our filters generally return between 30 and 80 features.&amp;nbsp; When we show the table for the filtered features, we are unable to select a feature through the table to zoom to it.&amp;nbsp; I mean, it looks selected, but the table always shows "x features, 0 selected."&amp;nbsp; I know the function works because smaller feature classes seem to perform pretty well.&amp;nbsp; But, it's like the show table function is trying to manage all 77000 features instead of the 30-80 we've selected.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can anyone shed any light on this?&amp;nbsp; And any tips/tricks are welcome.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Mary Ellen&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2014 13:22:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-questions/show-table-performance/m-p/496804#M25050</guid>
      <dc:creator>MaryEllen_Perko</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-27T13:22:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

