<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea esri forum search - results quality in ArcGIS Online Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-ideas/esri-forum-search-results-quality/idi-p/1068725</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I can't put my finger on it but the search results quantity and quality seems reduced on this new forum platform, even with filtering, from the previous gen. Anyone else feel this? I am very glad the Esri folks jump in and discuss with us and we have a great forum with a vast user community. Just wondering if somehow the autocomplete intelligence can be 'boosted' a bit, kind of "Googleified" so to speak. @Anonymous User I know it will be in good hands with you. I wish I could be of more help! It is just a general feeling like it seems things used to be more targeted somehow in terms of results.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2021 02:17:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>KevinMacLeodCAI</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-06-16T02:17:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>esri forum search - results quality</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-ideas/esri-forum-search-results-quality/idi-p/1068725</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I can't put my finger on it but the search results quantity and quality seems reduced on this new forum platform, even with filtering, from the previous gen. Anyone else feel this? I am very glad the Esri folks jump in and discuss with us and we have a great forum with a vast user community. Just wondering if somehow the autocomplete intelligence can be 'boosted' a bit, kind of "Googleified" so to speak. @Anonymous User I know it will be in good hands with you. I wish I could be of more help! It is just a general feeling like it seems things used to be more targeted somehow in terms of results.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2021 02:17:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-ideas/esri-forum-search-results-quality/idi-p/1068725</guid>
      <dc:creator>KevinMacLeodCAI</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-16T02:17:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

