<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Support More Robust Symbology Hatching in ArcGIS Online Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-ideas/support-more-robust-symbology-hatching/idi-p/932988</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;For map (feature) services hosted on ArcGIS Online, only hollow- and solid-fill polygon symbology is effectively supported.&amp;nbsp; Feature services can be published that use polygon hatching symbols, but the hatching will always be black--no color is supported.&amp;nbsp; Similarly, when modifying the symbology of polygons in ArcGIS Online, only hollow- and solid-fill symbols are available.&amp;nbsp; It would be very nice to support a more robust set of polygon symbology.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 19:56:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Phil_Hartger</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-11-28T19:56:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Support More Robust Symbology Hatching</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-ideas/support-more-robust-symbology-hatching/idi-p/932988</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;For map (feature) services hosted on ArcGIS Online, only hollow- and solid-fill polygon symbology is effectively supported.&amp;nbsp; Feature services can be published that use polygon hatching symbols, but the hatching will always be black--no color is supported.&amp;nbsp; Similarly, when modifying the symbology of polygons in ArcGIS Online, only hollow- and solid-fill symbols are available.&amp;nbsp; It would be very nice to support a more robust set of polygon symbology.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 19:56:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-ideas/support-more-robust-symbology-hatching/idi-p/932988</guid>
      <dc:creator>Phil_Hartger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-11-28T19:56:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Support More Robust Symbology Hatching</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-ideas/support-more-robust-symbology-hatching/idc-p/932989#M1635</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;This idea is linked to :&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/ideas/8285" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.esri.com/ideas/8285&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Possible solution is proposed here :&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://github.com/Chaussette/esri.symbol.FillPattern" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://github.com/Chaussette/esri.symbol.FillPattern&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;DIV id="stcpDiv" style=""&gt;&lt;A href="https://github.com/Chaussette/esri.symbol.FillPattern#sthash.ha6vIjkp.dpuf" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://github.com/Chaussette/esri.symbol.FillPattern#sthash.ha6vIjkp.dpuf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV id="stcpDiv" style=""&gt;&lt;A href="https://github.com/Chaussette/esri.symbol.FillPattern#sthash.ha6vIjkp.dpuf" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://github.com/Chaussette/esri.symbol.FillPattern#sthash.ha6vIjkp.dpuf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;

&lt;!-- content transformation source ID: 00aE0000006F9Vl --&gt;

&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2021 08:07:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-ideas/support-more-robust-symbology-hatching/idc-p/932989#M1635</guid>
      <dc:creator>SimonUyttendaele</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-22T08:07:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Support More Robust Symbology Hatching</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-ideas/support-more-robust-symbology-hatching/idc-p/932990#M1636</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;ESRI wants people to use ArcGIS&amp;nbsp; for their maps so why don't they support all the general gallery symbology that are available in ArcMap, ArcGIS Pro software for your ArcGIS&amp;nbsp; maps.. Very frustrated that we can't use different kinds of polygon symbols in our city maps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2018 20:37:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-ideas/support-more-robust-symbology-hatching/idc-p/932990#M1636</guid>
      <dc:creator>DaneGarvin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-22T20:37:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Support More Robust Symbology Hatching</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-ideas/support-more-robust-symbology-hatching/idc-p/932991#M1637</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I totally agree. We are seeing people with Desktop experience using ArcGIS Online more and they feel limited in what they can do with symbology.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2019 21:15:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-ideas/support-more-robust-symbology-hatching/idc-p/932991#M1637</guid>
      <dc:creator>MichaelTrust</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-22T21:15:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Support More Robust Symbology Hatching</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-ideas/support-more-robust-symbology-hatching/idc-p/932992#M1638</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I just published a hosted service in AGO with simple polygon cross hatching. Just learned AGO won't display it. Up vote.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:53:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-ideas/support-more-robust-symbology-hatching/idc-p/932992#M1638</guid>
      <dc:creator>ColeAndrews</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T14:53:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Support More Robust Symbology Hatching</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-ideas/support-more-robust-symbology-hatching/idc-p/932993#M1639</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I see this item's status is "Reviewed," but it is 7 years old and this functionality is still not in AGOL. Is this a planned enhancement in the near future?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 21:42:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-ideas/support-more-robust-symbology-hatching/idc-p/932993#M1639</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarvinDavis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-02T21:42:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Support More Robust Symbology Hatching</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-ideas/support-more-robust-symbology-hatching/idc-p/932994#M1640</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let's go ESRI, this enhancement is way past due. The users need and deserve this functionality. Is this a planned enhancement in the near future?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2019 14:07:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-ideas/support-more-robust-symbology-hatching/idc-p/932994#M1640</guid>
      <dc:creator>BryanShoaf1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-04T14:07:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Support More Robust Symbology Hatching</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-ideas/support-more-robust-symbology-hatching/idc-p/932995#M1641</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Definitely needed. It's very frustrating to do a load of styling work in Pro, only to upload it and discover some of your symbology doesn't work properly in AGOL. If Pro and AGOL are to be truly complimentary, they need to at least be able to make the content look the same in both.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2019 14:19:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-ideas/support-more-robust-symbology-hatching/idc-p/932995#M1641</guid>
      <dc:creator>AndreaR</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-04T14:19:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Support More Robust Symbology Hatching</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-ideas/support-more-robust-symbology-hatching/idc-p/932996#M1642</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since I'm&amp;nbsp;someone with next-to-zero knowledge of JavaScript, how feasible is it to implement this "possible" solution?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2019 15:26:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-ideas/support-more-robust-symbology-hatching/idc-p/932996#M1642</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarvinDavis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-05T15:26:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Support More Robust Symbology Hatching</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-ideas/support-more-robust-symbology-hatching/idc-p/932997#M1643</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is exactly my issue.&amp;nbsp; I am moving to using ArcGIS Online for virtually everything.&amp;nbsp; I will still use Pro for editing on my end but have to create web apps for most users.&amp;nbsp; ArcGIS Server allowed me to do almost anything with symbology and now that I am using Hosted Feature Layers/Views it is extremely limited what I can do.&amp;nbsp; I can't even figure out a good way to symbolize railroads.&amp;nbsp; Really?, who symbolizes railroads with a simple line symbol?&amp;nbsp; You have to be able to tell the difference between railroads and regular roads.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2020 16:24:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-ideas/support-more-robust-symbology-hatching/idc-p/932997#M1643</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoshWhite</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-12T16:24:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Support More Robust Symbology Hatching</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-ideas/support-more-robust-symbology-hatching/idc-p/932998#M1644</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's funny we can do 3D in this environment but can't do some of the simplest symbology in a 2D map.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2020 16:25:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-ideas/support-more-robust-symbology-hatching/idc-p/932998#M1644</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoshWhite</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-12T16:25:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Support More Robust Symbology Hatching</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-ideas/support-more-robust-symbology-hatching/idc-p/1006062#M7525</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Come on ESRI!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is so overdue! Polygon and Line symbology options are verging on pathetic with respect to current day standards and capabilities in other software. It's practically impossible to make a decent looking map with more than 1 polygon layer that overlaps.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Step up or users will find alternatives.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2020 00:25:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-ideas/support-more-robust-symbology-hatching/idc-p/1006062#M7525</guid>
      <dc:creator>JamieSheehan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-02T00:25:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Support More Robust Symbology Hatching</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-ideas/support-more-robust-symbology-hatching/idc-p/1175011#M8971</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is there any update to this idea? With almost 200 kudos, what will it take to move this to &lt;EM&gt;Under Consideration&lt;/EM&gt;?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At the bottom of &lt;A href="https://www.esri.com/arcgis-blog/products/arcgis-pro/mapping/hatched-fills-and-how-to-sneak-them-into-arcgis-online/" target="_self"&gt;this blog post&lt;/A&gt; there is a reference to supporting hatches natively in AGOL coming Fall of 2021...I don't think this happened.&amp;nbsp; The overhead of having to publish to ArcGIS Enterprise to maintain basic cartography seems excessive.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2022 13:10:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-ideas/support-more-robust-symbology-hatching/idc-p/1175011#M8971</guid>
      <dc:creator>Matt-Huser</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-05-18T13:10:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Support More Robust Symbology Hatching</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-ideas/support-more-robust-symbology-hatching/idc-p/1181262#M9016</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Good News, I'm testing the June 2022 ArcGIS Online update via the Early Adopter Program and they have added support for crosshatching and dot fills!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2022 20:45:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-ideas/support-more-robust-symbology-hatching/idc-p/1181262#M9016</guid>
      <dc:creator>Matt-Huser</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-08T20:45:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Support More Robust Symbology Hatching - Status changed to: Implemented</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-ideas/support-more-robust-symbology-hatching/idc-p/1239491#M9598</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for submitting this Idea! We introduced options for more robust hatch fill symbology in our June and November 2022 releases. If you have further feedback on hatch fill symbology in ArcGIS Online Map Viewer, please feel free to reply here or create a new Idea with those specifics - I will be happy to pass it along to our internal teams.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.esri.com/arcgis-blog/products/arcgis-online/announcements/whats-new-arcgis-online-june-2022/" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.esri.com/arcgis-blog/products/arcgis-online/announcements/whats-new-arcgis-online-june-2022/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.esri.com/arcgis-blog/products/arcgis-online/mapping/whats-new-in-map-viewer-november-2022/" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.esri.com/arcgis-blog/products/arcgis-online/mapping/whats-new-in-map-viewer-november-2022/&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Sarah&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ArcGIS Online Advocacy Lead&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2022 01:08:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-ideas/support-more-robust-symbology-hatching/idc-p/1239491#M9598</guid>
      <dc:creator>sarah_maisel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-09T01:08:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

