<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Geocoding Rematch Workflow Gap in Map Viewer — An Educator's Perspective in ArcGIS Online Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-ideas/geocoding-rematch-workflow-gap-in-map-viewer-an/idi-p/1692324</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;With the retirement of Map Viewer Classic in Q1 2026, a meaningful workflow gap has emerged for those of us teaching geocoding in a browser-based ArcGIS Online environment: there is no longer a streamlined, interactive way to review and rematch unmatched locations comparable to what Classic provided.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Map Viewer Classic offered an intuitive interactive rematch experience — a consolidated view of matched, tied, and unmatched records with candidate scoring, address inspection, and map-based placement, all in one dialog. This was ideal for teaching students the full geocoding quality review process.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The current Map Viewer "Review Locations" workflow requires multiple steps across multiple panes (Layers pane → Show Table → Create Feature → Search → manually delete from review table). For unmatched records, students must:&lt;BR /&gt;- Open the layer table alongside the review table&lt;BR /&gt;- Use "Create feature" to manually place points via search&lt;BR /&gt;- Separately edit and delete the record from the review table&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is a cumbersome multi-step process that fragments what was once a single cohesive workflow, and it lacks the match score visibility and candidate list that made the Classic experience pedagogically valuable.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;**The workaround isn't workable for Web GIS**&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, ArcGIS Pro's Rematch Addresses pane is the functional successor — and it's excellent. But recommending Pro for a workflow that previously lived entirely in the browser defeats the purpose of teaching Web GIS. Not all students have reliable desktop access, and the browser-based environment is increasingly where the industry operates.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please consider restoring a proper interactive geocoding review/rematch experience in Map Viewer — one that surfaces match scores, candidate lists, and allows address correction without requiring users to navigate across multiple panes. This is a foundational GIS skill that deserves a first-class browser-based workflow.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I suspect this is affecting more educators and practitioners than have formally raised it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 18:46:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AndrewBernish__MDOT_</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-03-24T18:46:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Geocoding Rematch Workflow Gap in Map Viewer — An Educator's Perspective</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-ideas/geocoding-rematch-workflow-gap-in-map-viewer-an/idi-p/1692324</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;With the retirement of Map Viewer Classic in Q1 2026, a meaningful workflow gap has emerged for those of us teaching geocoding in a browser-based ArcGIS Online environment: there is no longer a streamlined, interactive way to review and rematch unmatched locations comparable to what Classic provided.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Map Viewer Classic offered an intuitive interactive rematch experience — a consolidated view of matched, tied, and unmatched records with candidate scoring, address inspection, and map-based placement, all in one dialog. This was ideal for teaching students the full geocoding quality review process.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The current Map Viewer "Review Locations" workflow requires multiple steps across multiple panes (Layers pane → Show Table → Create Feature → Search → manually delete from review table). For unmatched records, students must:&lt;BR /&gt;- Open the layer table alongside the review table&lt;BR /&gt;- Use "Create feature" to manually place points via search&lt;BR /&gt;- Separately edit and delete the record from the review table&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is a cumbersome multi-step process that fragments what was once a single cohesive workflow, and it lacks the match score visibility and candidate list that made the Classic experience pedagogically valuable.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;**The workaround isn't workable for Web GIS**&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, ArcGIS Pro's Rematch Addresses pane is the functional successor — and it's excellent. But recommending Pro for a workflow that previously lived entirely in the browser defeats the purpose of teaching Web GIS. Not all students have reliable desktop access, and the browser-based environment is increasingly where the industry operates.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please consider restoring a proper interactive geocoding review/rematch experience in Map Viewer — one that surfaces match scores, candidate lists, and allows address correction without requiring users to navigate across multiple panes. This is a foundational GIS skill that deserves a first-class browser-based workflow.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I suspect this is affecting more educators and practitioners than have formally raised it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 18:46:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-ideas/geocoding-rematch-workflow-gap-in-map-viewer-an/idi-p/1692324</guid>
      <dc:creator>AndrewBernish__MDOT_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-24T18:46:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

