<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Using parameterized network attributes with Navteq data in ArcGIS Network Analyst Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-network-analyst-questions/using-parameterized-network-attributes-with-navteq/m-p/400633#M3819</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Alan:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks for your reply.&amp;nbsp; I agree with all that you said, and in fact we were confident that we did not need to worry about multiple obstructions along a long Navteq link because, as you mentioned, there is no way to leave the segment and the most restrictive overpass would suffice as a height restriction.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The problem is:&amp;nbsp; sometimes an oversize vehicle has as its' destination, a structure midway along a long segment i.e. bridge reconstruction of the third of five bridges; perhaps a crane needs to travel to the site for construction work ... it is not going all the way to the next exit point.&amp;nbsp; So, we are looking for a way to get the OSOW vehicle to the site.&amp;nbsp; Without splitting the segment, we will not be able to do so.&amp;nbsp; I do agree that if we split, we need to account for all other Navteq attributes.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Bob&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 19:42:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RobertLindquist</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-12-09T19:42:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Using parameterized network attributes with Navteq data</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-network-analyst-questions/using-parameterized-network-attributes-with-navteq/m-p/400632#M3818</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have built a statewide network from Navteq streets and need to use parametrized attributes to route oversize vehicles.&amp;nbsp; The problem is:&amp;nbsp; often a Navteq feature is very long.&amp;nbsp; There may be several overpasses on a single roadway feature.&amp;nbsp; I need to split the Navteq feature in order to assign a height parameter for each overpass.&amp;nbsp; When I do this and then create the network dataset, I am unable to route across any segment that has been split ... no route is found.&amp;nbsp; Prior to splitting the Navteq features, routes are successfully found.&amp;nbsp; I am using the "Street Data Processing Tools" for Navteq data, toolbox in ArcGIS 10 to create the network dataset.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;When I split the Navteq features, I retain the same LINKID (I have duplicate LINKIDs).&amp;nbsp; Not sure if this is an issue or not.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:58:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-network-analyst-questions/using-parameterized-network-attributes-with-navteq/m-p/400632#M3818</guid>
      <dc:creator>RobertLindquist</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-06T17:58:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using parameterized network attributes with Navteq data</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-network-analyst-questions/using-parameterized-network-attributes-with-navteq/m-p/400633#M3819</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Alan:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks for your reply.&amp;nbsp; I agree with all that you said, and in fact we were confident that we did not need to worry about multiple obstructions along a long Navteq link because, as you mentioned, there is no way to leave the segment and the most restrictive overpass would suffice as a height restriction.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The problem is:&amp;nbsp; sometimes an oversize vehicle has as its' destination, a structure midway along a long segment i.e. bridge reconstruction of the third of five bridges; perhaps a crane needs to travel to the site for construction work ... it is not going all the way to the next exit point.&amp;nbsp; So, we are looking for a way to get the OSOW vehicle to the site.&amp;nbsp; Without splitting the segment, we will not be able to do so.&amp;nbsp; I do agree that if we split, we need to account for all other Navteq attributes.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Bob&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 19:42:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-network-analyst-questions/using-parameterized-network-attributes-with-navteq/m-p/400633#M3819</guid>
      <dc:creator>RobertLindquist</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-09T19:42:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

