<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Peculiar behaviour while conducting a location-allocation exercise in ArcGIS Network Analyst Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-network-analyst-questions/peculiar-behaviour-while-conducting-a-location/m-p/330016#M3157</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This exercise is the precursor to a much larger project but I thought I'd start with a more manageable dataset and build from their.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have a roughly 16 mile square with potentially 900 facilities and 990 demand points.&amp;nbsp; I am using the location-allocation tool in NA with Problem Type: Maximize Coverage; Facilities to Choose: 18, Impedance Cutoff: 1800, Impedence Transformation: Power and Impedance Power: 1.&amp;nbsp; The result I am getting is fairly sensible except for the unexpected clustering of two or three 'Chosen' facilities within each other's catchment.&amp;nbsp; I am also getting demand counts with a huge range (from 8 to 97 in the case of 20 chosen facilities and 8 to 156 in my 18 facility option.&amp;nbsp; I've had the data set tried on a different computer and it works as expected but when I do it on my machine (running XP proff. ArcGIS10 svpk 2) I get this weird behaviour. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Has anybody else had this experience?&amp;nbsp; Any suggestions as to what I should do totroubleshoot/fix it?&amp;nbsp; Any advice greatly appreciated!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MarkShymanski</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-01-24T12:23:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Peculiar behaviour while conducting a location-allocation exercise</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-network-analyst-questions/peculiar-behaviour-while-conducting-a-location/m-p/330016#M3157</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This exercise is the precursor to a much larger project but I thought I'd start with a more manageable dataset and build from their.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have a roughly 16 mile square with potentially 900 facilities and 990 demand points.&amp;nbsp; I am using the location-allocation tool in NA with Problem Type: Maximize Coverage; Facilities to Choose: 18, Impedance Cutoff: 1800, Impedence Transformation: Power and Impedance Power: 1.&amp;nbsp; The result I am getting is fairly sensible except for the unexpected clustering of two or three 'Chosen' facilities within each other's catchment.&amp;nbsp; I am also getting demand counts with a huge range (from 8 to 97 in the case of 20 chosen facilities and 8 to 156 in my 18 facility option.&amp;nbsp; I've had the data set tried on a different computer and it works as expected but when I do it on my machine (running XP proff. ArcGIS10 svpk 2) I get this weird behaviour. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Has anybody else had this experience?&amp;nbsp; Any suggestions as to what I should do totroubleshoot/fix it?&amp;nbsp; Any advice greatly appreciated!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-network-analyst-questions/peculiar-behaviour-while-conducting-a-location/m-p/330016#M3157</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarkShymanski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-24T12:23:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Peculiar behaviour while conducting a location-allocation exercise</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-network-analyst-questions/peculiar-behaviour-while-conducting-a-location/m-p/330017#M3158</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Do note that that Location-Allocation is not trying to balance all choosen facilities with the same amount of demand, so each facility can have a wide range of demand points assigned to it.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;However, you should not get two different solutions on the same data/problem on two different machines.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If you are geting different behavior then it could be a difference in the underlying network dataset (restrictions, impedance, etc)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;or the locations are not correct. By that I mean you may have loaded the locations using "network locations" instead of geometry when in fact the network locations have become stale. You could create a new Location-Allocation layer on your problem layer, re-load the locations making sure to check on the Use Geometry and not the Use Network Location Fields and re-solve.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If this does not solve the issue, then perhaps you can post a screen-shot of what you are getting.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Jay Sandhu&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:41:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-network-analyst-questions/peculiar-behaviour-while-conducting-a-location/m-p/330017#M3158</guid>
      <dc:creator>JaySandhu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-24T15:41:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Peculiar behaviour while conducting a location-allocation exercise</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-network-analyst-questions/peculiar-behaviour-while-conducting-a-location/m-p/330018#M3159</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thank you Jay for the reply.&amp;nbsp; After much consultation with ESRI's excellant tech support it was determined that a re install of the software was required.&amp;nbsp; Once that was done everything worked as planned.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:01:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-network-analyst-questions/peculiar-behaviour-while-conducting-a-location/m-p/330018#M3159</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarkShymanski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-30T14:01:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

