<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Location Allocation with Weights and Capacity in ArcGIS Network Analyst Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-network-analyst-questions/location-allocation-with-weights-and-capacity/m-p/281708#M2771</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a problem, which is to perform a location allocation activity for facilities, each with a Weight (attractiveness compared to the others) and a maximum Capacity to consider.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The only types of problems that consider weights are those of market share (Maximize and Target).&lt;BR /&gt;The capacity is instead respected only in Maximize the coverage capacity.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How to perform an activity that takes into account both constraints?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gianni&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:21:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>GianniContino</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-09-10T10:21:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Location Allocation with Weights and Capacity</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-network-analyst-questions/location-allocation-with-weights-and-capacity/m-p/281708#M2771</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a problem, which is to perform a location allocation activity for facilities, each with a Weight (attractiveness compared to the others) and a maximum Capacity to consider.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The only types of problems that consider weights are those of market share (Maximize and Target).&lt;BR /&gt;The capacity is instead respected only in Maximize the coverage capacity.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How to perform an activity that takes into account both constraints?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gianni&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:21:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-network-analyst-questions/location-allocation-with-weights-and-capacity/m-p/281708#M2771</guid>
      <dc:creator>GianniContino</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-10T10:21:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Location Allocation with Weights and Capacity</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-network-analyst-questions/location-allocation-with-weights-and-capacity/m-p/281709#M2772</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;As you noted, Location-Allocation does not provide a model that takes both capacity and attractiveness into account. Usually attractiveness is in used in retail industry where the retail establishment usually do not have a capacity of customers they want to deal with. Can you describe your use case? How should these two properties impact the location decision?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jay Sandhu&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2020 19:26:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-network-analyst-questions/location-allocation-with-weights-and-capacity/m-p/281709#M2772</guid>
      <dc:creator>JaySandhu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-02T19:26:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

