<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Time impedance does not honor default cutoff value correctly in ArcGIS Network Analyst Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-network-analyst-questions/time-impedance-does-not-honor-default-cutoff-value/m-p/102911#M1029</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;You have found a bug!&amp;nbsp; There should a prize or something for you, but all I can give is my gratitude.&amp;nbsp; Strangely, even though this bug has been around since 10.0, it has gone unnoticed until you and one other user both found it this week.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The problem is that the Global Turn Delay Evaluator is being ignored when the route is being calculated.&amp;nbsp; The delay cost is added in when the total cost is given in the results, but during the search, it is not considered.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; We have a bug entered for this and it will be fixed in the next release.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;That means, unfortunately, that you won't be able to use the GTDE in the way you were trying to.&amp;nbsp; You'll need a workaround.&amp;nbsp; How many places do you have unsignalized arterial roadway crossings?&amp;nbsp; If it is not too cumbersome, you could digitize in turn features with turn delay costs.&amp;nbsp; Or you could place additive point barriers with the correct curb approach to ensure that travel in the right direction off of an edge picks up the cost.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Look into these solutions, or ask more questions and I'll help you figure out a way to accomplish your goals without using the GTDE.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Sorry for the inconvenience, but thanks for helping us improve the software.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 18:56:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PatrickStevens</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-14T18:56:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Time impedance does not honor default cutoff value correctly</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-network-analyst-questions/time-impedance-does-not-honor-default-cutoff-value/m-p/102910#M1028</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I've created a network data set to that utilizes hierarchy to assign and global turn delay to assign a severe penalty to crossing unsignalized arterial roadway crossings. The intent was to assign a high value and set the cutoff value well below the threshold. In testing the network, I've determined that cost is accumulating as expected, but network analyst is finding routes with a much higher cost value than I've specified in the analysis settings. I should note that I used the Global Turn Delay calculator to set my turn delay very high for local roadways crossing arterials.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Network analyst will not 'solve' when the cutoff is lower than 150. However, when I use any higher value the time accumulation is well above the threshold (about 5,000) which is the value I assigned to the intersections. Coincidentally, the points are about 150 M apart. I'm wondering if I've set the evaluators incorrectly? Screenshot attached.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 01:03:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-network-analyst-questions/time-impedance-does-not-honor-default-cutoff-value/m-p/102910#M1028</guid>
      <dc:creator>KimVoros1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-14T01:03:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Time impedance does not honor default cutoff value correctly</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-network-analyst-questions/time-impedance-does-not-honor-default-cutoff-value/m-p/102911#M1029</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;You have found a bug!&amp;nbsp; There should a prize or something for you, but all I can give is my gratitude.&amp;nbsp; Strangely, even though this bug has been around since 10.0, it has gone unnoticed until you and one other user both found it this week.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The problem is that the Global Turn Delay Evaluator is being ignored when the route is being calculated.&amp;nbsp; The delay cost is added in when the total cost is given in the results, but during the search, it is not considered.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; We have a bug entered for this and it will be fixed in the next release.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;That means, unfortunately, that you won't be able to use the GTDE in the way you were trying to.&amp;nbsp; You'll need a workaround.&amp;nbsp; How many places do you have unsignalized arterial roadway crossings?&amp;nbsp; If it is not too cumbersome, you could digitize in turn features with turn delay costs.&amp;nbsp; Or you could place additive point barriers with the correct curb approach to ensure that travel in the right direction off of an edge picks up the cost.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Look into these solutions, or ask more questions and I'll help you figure out a way to accomplish your goals without using the GTDE.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Sorry for the inconvenience, but thanks for helping us improve the software.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 18:56:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-network-analyst-questions/time-impedance-does-not-honor-default-cutoff-value/m-p/102911#M1029</guid>
      <dc:creator>PatrickStevens</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-14T18:56:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

