<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea World Imagery basemap - higher DPI for exports in ArcGIS Living Atlas Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-living-atlas-ideas/world-imagery-basemap-higher-dpi-for-exports/idi-p/958702</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We use aerial imagery basemaps quite often in ArcMap and would love to take advantage of ESRI's World Imagery service layer but we can't due to poor quality. &amp;nbsp;I've learned that when we export, even if we're telling the export a to be a PNG at 300 DPI, the ESRI service layer is at 96 DPI. &amp;nbsp;This makes it unusable for us as we export to print a large majority of our materials. &amp;nbsp;I understand the desire to have a 96 DPI service layer for desktop &amp;amp; web viewing only but ESRI should offer an additional service that is at a higher DPI for customers who export for printing. &amp;nbsp;Can this please be considered? &amp;nbsp;I'll gladly share examples and do anything I can to help.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Buck&lt;/P&gt;&lt;!--   content transformation source ID: 087E0000000fxVA   --&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 16:47:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>BuckDwyer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-05-16T16:47:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>World Imagery basemap - higher DPI for exports</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-living-atlas-ideas/world-imagery-basemap-higher-dpi-for-exports/idi-p/958702</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We use aerial imagery basemaps quite often in ArcMap and would love to take advantage of ESRI's World Imagery service layer but we can't due to poor quality. &amp;nbsp;I've learned that when we export, even if we're telling the export a to be a PNG at 300 DPI, the ESRI service layer is at 96 DPI. &amp;nbsp;This makes it unusable for us as we export to print a large majority of our materials. &amp;nbsp;I understand the desire to have a 96 DPI service layer for desktop &amp;amp; web viewing only but ESRI should offer an additional service that is at a higher DPI for customers who export for printing. &amp;nbsp;Can this please be considered? &amp;nbsp;I'll gladly share examples and do anything I can to help.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Buck&lt;/P&gt;&lt;!--   content transformation source ID: 087E0000000fxVA   --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 16:47:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-living-atlas-ideas/world-imagery-basemap-higher-dpi-for-exports/idi-p/958702</guid>
      <dc:creator>BuckDwyer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-16T16:47:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sharper basemaps</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-living-atlas-ideas/world-imagery-basemap-higher-dpi-for-exports/idc-p/1534789#M66</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;For a long time I have been struggling with blurry basemaps when making map figures in ArcGIS Pro. Even at close up scales of 1:10k, the aerial/satellite imagery that otherwise looks sharp in a map window is exported grainy and blurry from the layout window. I thought this issue was only related to Esri basemaps, but it's the same when using Google's imagery.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Creating sharp and clear map graphics should be a priority for a GIS software, and right now this is very hard to do with cloud based basemaps in ArcPro.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In comparison QGIS does this easily in a few clicks. The first image shows how QGIS exports Google's satellite basemap at 1:15k scale. The second image is the best I can do with ArcPro, and this is after optimizing all the export and display settings.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="savannah_15k_300dpi_QGIS.jpg" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/114224iD569B8E70CBDA314/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="savannah_15k_300dpi_QGIS.jpg" alt="savannah_15k_300dpi_QGIS.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Savannah_15k_300dpi_100Quality_ArcPro_AntAliasingBest_HardwareAntAliasing_DX12.jpg" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/114225i60BDF6E440E9E5F0/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Savannah_15k_300dpi_100Quality_ArcPro_AntAliasingBest_HardwareAntAliasing_DX12.jpg" alt="Savannah_15k_300dpi_100Quality_ArcPro_AntAliasingBest_HardwareAntAliasing_DX12.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I find the quality of the ArcMap graphic unacceptable, and scientific journals would reject the quality of this imagery in their publications.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please please Esri, add the ability to export sharp basempas from your software products and save your customer base a lot of time tinkering around with map production. We will be so grateful!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2024 01:44:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-living-atlas-ideas/world-imagery-basemap-higher-dpi-for-exports/idc-p/1534789#M66</guid>
      <dc:creator>JochenSchubert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-04T01:44:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

