<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Generate Indoor Network Features thoroughness compared to previous methods in ArcGIS Indoors Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-indoors-questions/generate-indoor-network-features-thoroughness/m-p/1656668#M1172</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've been preparing to publish an indoor dataset to ArcGIS Enterprise. To do so I need to recreate the indoor network (due to the VBScript deprecation). I've tried the new "Generate Indoor Network Features" tool, but the output pathways it produces does not match the completeness of the Generate Pathways -&amp;gt; Generate Floor Transitions -&amp;gt; Thin Pathways trifecta. I've tried adjusting the input parameters, but it still fails to include a number of units to the network. Any thoughts why this could be the case, or things I could try? For now, I will just use the older method, but looking to the future I obviously would like to update to the new tool.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 14:47:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>KevinDyke</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-10-09T14:47:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Generate Indoor Network Features thoroughness compared to previous methods</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-indoors-questions/generate-indoor-network-features-thoroughness/m-p/1656668#M1172</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've been preparing to publish an indoor dataset to ArcGIS Enterprise. To do so I need to recreate the indoor network (due to the VBScript deprecation). I've tried the new "Generate Indoor Network Features" tool, but the output pathways it produces does not match the completeness of the Generate Pathways -&amp;gt; Generate Floor Transitions -&amp;gt; Thin Pathways trifecta. I've tried adjusting the input parameters, but it still fails to include a number of units to the network. Any thoughts why this could be the case, or things I could try? For now, I will just use the older method, but looking to the future I obviously would like to update to the new tool.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 14:47:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-indoors-questions/generate-indoor-network-features-thoroughness/m-p/1656668#M1172</guid>
      <dc:creator>KevinDyke</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-10-09T14:47:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Generate Indoor Network Features thoroughness compared to previous methods</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-indoors-questions/generate-indoor-network-features-thoroughness/m-p/1668284#M1175</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I tried the new tool again and it was much more comprehensive, so I'll chalk my previous results up to my own data funkiness.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 19:05:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-indoors-questions/generate-indoor-network-features-thoroughness/m-p/1668284#M1175</guid>
      <dc:creator>KevinDyke</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-11-24T19:05:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

