<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic The algorithm (Gram-Schmidt) produces much better high-resolution clarity in ArcGIS Image Server Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-image-server-questions/the-algorithm-gram-schmidt-produces-much-better/m-p/426871#M552</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size:3;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family:Times New Roman;"&gt;Hi, colleagues&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;The pan-sharpening algorithm of Gram-Schmidt &lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri;"&gt;within Mosaic Dataset model 10.1 pro&lt;/SPAN&gt;duces much better high-resolution clarity on color image against many other popular algorithms. As an example, for GeoEye-1, when zoom-in up to 1:500 (its full resolution roughly at 1:1800), it still can exhibit good &lt;BR /&gt;clarity, which shows much clearer features (i.e., features not split at all). &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It looks really &lt;SPAN style="font-family:Times New Roman;"&gt;p&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size:3;"&gt;owerful and amazing&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size:3;"&gt;. Personally, it will challenge the use of 20 ~ 30-cm resolution airphotos in practice.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-family: Times New Roman;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size:3;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;+++++++++++++++++&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-family: Times New Roman;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size:3;"&gt;PS., &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-size: 3; font-family: Calibri;"&gt;On our practices, the pan-sharpening algorithm of Gram-Schmidt still makes unacceptable color recovery (not in nature) at most cases, so that it is really hard for Mosaic Dataset model to ???automatically??? adjust unbalanced colors among massive tiles, &lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri;"&gt;including the use of combination with the best algorithm ???Edge Detection???&lt;/SPAN&gt;. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-size: 3; font-family: Calibri;"&gt;Secondly, as a well-known issue, users have been also looking forward to more flexible capability&amp;nbsp; &lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-size: 3; font-family: Calibri;"&gt;'inside' Mosaic Dataset model &lt;/SPAN&gt;to &lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-size: 3; font-family: Calibri;"&gt;???directly??? &lt;/SPAN&gt;deal with GCP (Ground Control Points) such as surveying, GIS references, and raster imagery references for spatial improvement.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Finally, as an operational issue, users are eager to have an efficient ArcTool to automatically ???Export??? processed images from Mosaic Dataset ???as batch???, which is individually named on ???field' name of feature class.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 03:19:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>larryzhang</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-02-04T03:19:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>The algorithm (Gram-Schmidt) produces much better high-resolution clarity</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-image-server-questions/the-algorithm-gram-schmidt-produces-much-better/m-p/426871#M552</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size:3;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family:Times New Roman;"&gt;Hi, colleagues&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;The pan-sharpening algorithm of Gram-Schmidt &lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri;"&gt;within Mosaic Dataset model 10.1 pro&lt;/SPAN&gt;duces much better high-resolution clarity on color image against many other popular algorithms. As an example, for GeoEye-1, when zoom-in up to 1:500 (its full resolution roughly at 1:1800), it still can exhibit good &lt;BR /&gt;clarity, which shows much clearer features (i.e., features not split at all). &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It looks really &lt;SPAN style="font-family:Times New Roman;"&gt;p&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size:3;"&gt;owerful and amazing&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size:3;"&gt;. Personally, it will challenge the use of 20 ~ 30-cm resolution airphotos in practice.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-family: Times New Roman;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size:3;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;+++++++++++++++++&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-family: Times New Roman;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size:3;"&gt;PS., &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-size: 3; font-family: Calibri;"&gt;On our practices, the pan-sharpening algorithm of Gram-Schmidt still makes unacceptable color recovery (not in nature) at most cases, so that it is really hard for Mosaic Dataset model to ???automatically??? adjust unbalanced colors among massive tiles, &lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri;"&gt;including the use of combination with the best algorithm ???Edge Detection???&lt;/SPAN&gt;. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-size: 3; font-family: Calibri;"&gt;Secondly, as a well-known issue, users have been also looking forward to more flexible capability&amp;nbsp; &lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-size: 3; font-family: Calibri;"&gt;'inside' Mosaic Dataset model &lt;/SPAN&gt;to &lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-size: 3; font-family: Calibri;"&gt;???directly??? &lt;/SPAN&gt;deal with GCP (Ground Control Points) such as surveying, GIS references, and raster imagery references for spatial improvement.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Finally, as an operational issue, users are eager to have an efficient ArcTool to automatically ???Export??? processed images from Mosaic Dataset ???as batch???, which is individually named on ???field' name of feature class.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 03:19:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-image-server-questions/the-algorithm-gram-schmidt-produces-much-better/m-p/426871#M552</guid>
      <dc:creator>larryzhang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-04T03:19:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

