<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ArcGIS Server Bandwidth in ArcGIS Image Server Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-image-server-questions/arcgis-server-bandwidth/m-p/353242#M270</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;All&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; i was thinking the other day about how we are serving out our services and what it takes to update all the data in play, and it got me wondering...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we are serving out two main services: Service 1 only has vector data, Service 2 has that same vector data but also has raster data underneath.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have seen where some users always keep their vector and raster data separate&amp;nbsp;instead of combining them. I was wondering if anyone has looked into if there is any major cost to bandwidth in having them separate vs having them combined? I would imagine that there would be some cost involved as you are reaching out to two separate&amp;nbsp;services all the time.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dave&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2019 18:13:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DaveTenney</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-01-29T18:13:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ArcGIS Server Bandwidth</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-image-server-questions/arcgis-server-bandwidth/m-p/353242#M270</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;All&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; i was thinking the other day about how we are serving out our services and what it takes to update all the data in play, and it got me wondering...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we are serving out two main services: Service 1 only has vector data, Service 2 has that same vector data but also has raster data underneath.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have seen where some users always keep their vector and raster data separate&amp;nbsp;instead of combining them. I was wondering if anyone has looked into if there is any major cost to bandwidth in having them separate vs having them combined? I would imagine that there would be some cost involved as you are reaching out to two separate&amp;nbsp;services all the time.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dave&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2019 18:13:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-image-server-questions/arcgis-server-bandwidth/m-p/353242#M270</guid>
      <dc:creator>DaveTenney</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-29T18:13:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

