<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Searching Hub content by Map - please add back! in ArcGIS Hub Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-hub-ideas/searching-hub-content-by-map-please-add-back/idi-p/1045325</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We just implemented a new Hub site that will act as our Open Data Portal, and I was devastated to learn this capability &lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-hub-questions/why-did-hub-get-rid-of-map-based-search/m-p/1045180#M4298" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;was intentionally removed&lt;/A&gt;. I literally cannot believe ESRI did this. At least add searching by a map as a option, rather than remove it outright! We have some products that are gridded due to size (i.e. contours). If someone searches our site for "contours", the results are 400 items. You can try it yourself at&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://data.cityofsalem.net/" target="_self" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;data.cityofsalem.net&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;. The user experience is horrible. The user has zero idea which item is relevant&amp;nbsp;to them. Only knowing where the layer exists in geographic space can help identify which are applicable. The ability for a end user to filter results by a AOI or extents or a map is a critical need. Using the "near" keyword is not enough and certainly not prominent enough (it also doesn't work). I had a contractor two weeks ago not able to find the contours they needed on our Hub site because they couldn't&amp;nbsp;determine which layers applied. Keyword search is not enough!!!!!!!!!!!!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 01:20:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>COSPNWGuy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-04-09T01:20:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Searching Hub content by Map - please add back!</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-hub-ideas/searching-hub-content-by-map-please-add-back/idi-p/1045325</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We just implemented a new Hub site that will act as our Open Data Portal, and I was devastated to learn this capability &lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-hub-questions/why-did-hub-get-rid-of-map-based-search/m-p/1045180#M4298" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;was intentionally removed&lt;/A&gt;. I literally cannot believe ESRI did this. At least add searching by a map as a option, rather than remove it outright! We have some products that are gridded due to size (i.e. contours). If someone searches our site for "contours", the results are 400 items. You can try it yourself at&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://data.cityofsalem.net/" target="_self" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;data.cityofsalem.net&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;. The user experience is horrible. The user has zero idea which item is relevant&amp;nbsp;to them. Only knowing where the layer exists in geographic space can help identify which are applicable. The ability for a end user to filter results by a AOI or extents or a map is a critical need. Using the "near" keyword is not enough and certainly not prominent enough (it also doesn't work). I had a contractor two weeks ago not able to find the contours they needed on our Hub site because they couldn't&amp;nbsp;determine which layers applied. Keyword search is not enough!!!!!!!!!!!!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 01:20:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-hub-ideas/searching-hub-content-by-map-please-add-back/idi-p/1045325</guid>
      <dc:creator>COSPNWGuy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-09T01:20:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Searching Hub content by Map - please add back! - Status changed to: Implemented</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-hub-ideas/searching-hub-content-by-map-please-add-back/idc-p/1466736#M567</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/196743"&gt;@COSPNWGuy&lt;/a&gt;thank you for submitting this Hub Idea.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm happy to say that today we've released an inline map layout for the Hub site search catalog experience. You can learn more about the enhancement and other future map-based search enhancements in this blog post: &lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-hub-blog/browse-and-search-hub-content-geographically/ba-p/1431607" target="_self"&gt;https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-hub-blog/browse-and-search-hub-content-geographically/ba-p/1431607&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2024 17:27:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-hub-ideas/searching-hub-content-by-map-please-add-back/idc-p/1466736#M567</guid>
      <dc:creator>ThomasHervey1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-14T17:27:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

